LT - Brian Westbrook Released

[Brandon494]

Chester Taylor wasn't as good in his prime, but is aging well. He's as good as either of these two as a pass catcher and blocker and is also a solid runner. It's a good year if you want a veteran backup RB.


I know the odds are probably slim that we go RB, but there is a superstar out there that could fall to us at 24. Ryan Matthews from Fresno State. He's fast, a strong runner, breaks tackles, good size, very good pass catcher, very good pass protector, very hard worker. I know the draft is a crapshoot, but I feel very confident that Matthews will be a probowler.

It's one of those things, you want an OL, pass rusher or secondary player but when you end up with a dud at a position of need, you end up looking back and saying, "man, we could have one of the best RB's in the NFL had we just drafted this guy instead of that guy".

Not saying we should take him over a star at another position, but I think he's a great player. You'd have to consider him.

I like Ryan Matthews a lot but don't know about using our 1st round pick on a RB unless its C.J. Also you said he was a very good pass catcher but he only had 19 career catches and was often taken out of the game on passing downs. Also read he didn't do too much blocking college and does not hold a block well. Other than that this guy will prob have a rookie season similiar to Forte's rookie season for the Bears.

http://www.mockingthedraft.com/2010/...draft-scouting- Here is where I found the info on him if you want to check out his scouting report.

[ND72]

John Clayton made mention of don't be surprised if LT ends up in Green Bay. He also mentioned don't be surprised if Rolle from the Cards ends up in Green Bay either. Both of them think very highly of Aaron Rodgers, and he mentioned that Rolle said he never wants to have to play against Rodgers ever again.

John Clayton seems to be pretty close on some of these thoughts.

[pbmax]

Grass might help Westbrook's legs and his head, but it will not make either faster. And breakaway speed is the thing Grant is missing.

Westbrook could catch the ball far better (probably LT too) than Grant, but I am not sure that would be enough.

[Bossman641]

I'd look into Westbrook as a 3rd down back. No thanks to LT though. He's done.

[packerbacker1234]

I'd look into Westbrook as a 3rd down back. No thanks to LT though. He's done.

LT is done? He still showed some flashes last year. Defenses still were putting 8 and 9 in the box at times to stop him. Sproles didn't do much better, which again can point to OL issues. Last year was his first without 1,000 yards, and thats only because he did the smart thing and rested his injuries, isntead of playing through them like he always has. If anything, LT has the most left.

Westbrook has never played a complete 16 game season, as he gets hurt every year. Last year he played 8 games, and didn't even get over 300 yards. He has had two 1,000 yard rushing seasons, and both came in the 4 year stretch he had... that ended 3 seasons ago... where he was really putting up big passing numbers.

As of late, LT has been just as effective as Westbrook in the passing game averaging around 8 yards per catch. He also ran home 12 TD's last year, to westbrooks 1. Last year was only LT's 2nd season in his career he did not start a full season. The other? 2004. Westbrook is done, if you ask me. He is hurt every year, is never reliable, and miss half of last season, his worst injury yet. LT, meanwhile, played it safe last season to preserve his body with his injury, and was still, generally, effective. His carries were serverly cut, which lead, most likely, to his fall in production. He has always been an elusive power back, that got better the more you ran him. This season, he only ran the ball 50% of the time the chargers did run it, and still put up almost 800 yards and 12 td's. he also had the longest run of the year on the team, a 36 yarder.

LT has more left, and is way less prone to injury and thus more reliable, than westbrook. Meanwhile, westbrook is coming off his 8th straight season of being injured, with this season being his most serious injury ever.

Not sure how anyone wants Westbrook over LT. The only reason can be speed, but I treat him like Will Blackmon. Great at what he does, 100% unreliable to be around. LT still has something left as #2 and a third down back. Westbrook will be lucky if he has 2 or 3 games left before he goes down again. That is, if he can even really recover from his injury.

I go like this: If Grant has to miss a game who do I trust more - LT or Westbrook at this point in their careers? Have to go with LT. Chances are Westbrook is already on IR.

[packrulz]

I think LT is worth a look, the NFL is being cautious now with concussions, so Westbrook is prone to them. TT might consider it since he'll only cost cash and no draft picks, the Packers got cash.

[Bossman641]

I'd look into Westbrook as a 3rd down back. No thanks to LT though. He's done.

LT is done? He still showed some flashes last year. Defenses still were putting 8 and 9 in the box at times to stop him. Sproles didn't do much better, which again can point to OL issues. Last year was his first without 1,000 yards, and thats only because he did the smart thing and rested his injuries, isntead of playing through them like he always has. If anything, LT has the most left.

Westbrook has never played a complete 16 game season, as he gets hurt every year. Last year he played 8 games, and didn't even get over 300 yards. He has had two 1,000 yard rushing seasons, and both came in the 4 year stretch he had... that ended 3 seasons ago... where he was really putting up big passing numbers.

As of late, LT has been just as effective as Westbrook in the passing game averaging around 8 yards per catch. He also ran home 12 TD's last year, to westbrooks 1. Last year was only LT's 2nd season in his career he did not start a full season. The other? 2004. Westbrook is done, if you ask me. He is hurt every year, is never reliable, and miss half of last season, his worst injury yet. LT, meanwhile, played it safe last season to preserve his body with his injury, and was still, generally, effective. His carries were serverly cut, which lead, most likely, to his fall in production. He has always been an elusive power back, that got better the more you ran him. This season, he only ran the ball 50% of the time the chargers did run it, and still put up almost 800 yards and 12 td's. he also had the longest run of the year on the team, a 36 yarder.

LT has more left, and is way less prone to injury and thus more reliable, than westbrook. Meanwhile, westbrook is coming off his 8th straight season of being injured, with this season being his most serious injury ever.

Not sure how anyone wants Westbrook over LT. The only reason can be speed, but I treat him like Will Blackmon. Great at what he does, 100% unreliable to be around. LT still has something left as #2 and a third down back. Westbrook will be lucky if he has 2 or 3 games left before he goes down again. That is, if he can even really recover from his injury.

I go like this: If Grant has to miss a game who do I trust more - LT or Westbrook at this point in their careers? Have to go with LT. Chances are Westbrook is already on IR.

LT has also averaged 3.6 and 3.3 ypc over the past 2 seasons. He also still thinks that he is a #1 back and should be paid as such. I have a hard time imagining he would be happy comin to GB to be a backup.

Westbrook's injuries certainly scare me, and I don't know how he would feel about accepting a backup role, but his skillset better fits what this offense is missing.

[3irty1]

Either one would be a great signing and just what this team needs. I think I'd prefer Westbrook slightly as his injuries are usually the result of touching the ball on every single snap over the course of a 16 game season. Splitting the load with Grant will keep him fresh. LT should at least be able to be this seasons Ahman Green but LT is much less removed from being an elite back.

[pbmax]

I'd look into Westbrook as a 3rd down back. No thanks to LT though. He's done.

LT is done? He still showed some flashes last year. Defenses still were putting 8 and 9 in the box at times to stop him. Sproles didn't do much better, which again can point to OL issues. Last year was his first without 1,000 yards, and thats only because he did the smart thing and rested his injuries, isntead of playing through them like he always has. If anything, LT has the most left.

Given San Diego's passing attack, there is no way LT or Sproles faced 8 or nine in a box except in short yardage. Rivers and his receivers were what made that offense go, and people were scared to death of Vincent Jackson and Gates, not LT.

[ND72]

The one thing about LT is the fact he has never liked Norv Turner since he got there. LT's numbers have gone down almost every year since Turner's start in SD. I think a new start somewhere could be exactly what LT needs. I don't think he's done at all. One good point I remember hearing on NFL Live during the season was that SD's O-Line is built to pass protect, exactly what Turner wants, and are not a good run blocking OL. Something to consider as well.

[pbmax]

The one thing about LT is the fact he has never liked Norv Turner since he got there. LT's numbers have gone down almost every year since Turner's start in SD. I think a new start somewhere could be exactly what LT needs. I don't think he's done at all. One good point I remember hearing on NFL Live during the season was that SD's O-Line is built to pass protect, exactly what Turner wants, and are not a good run blocking OL. Something to consider as well.

An odd thing to be sure, as Turner has always liked running the ball despite his rep as Mr. Passing Coordinator.

[mission]

The one thing about LT is the fact he has never liked Norv Turner since he got there. LT's numbers have gone down almost every year since Turner's start in SD. I think a new start somewhere could be exactly what LT needs. I don't think he's done at all. One good point I remember hearing on NFL Live during the season was that SD's O-Line is built to pass protect, exactly what Turner wants, and are not a good run blocking OL. Something to consider as well.

This is my take on it also, ND.

Guys leave a team and want nothing more than to show their old team they can do it. They work harder in the offseason, they're more excited to be around new guys, etc, etc... Now that's not to say this is always going to happen and guys never get old. Just seems like it could be the case here (with all the sproles stuff also)

Obviously it begs one to question a guy's integrity at that point, but I like the whole FSS (fresh start syndrome), as evidenced by my support for non-"Packer People" :P