Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ferguson at it again

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Willard

    Potential bias in the reporting is one reason I love to read several different reviews of the practices including those by my fellow Packerrats! Different observers offer different takes on the action. Selective (or subjective) reporting can influence a fan's opinion on any of these guys. Maybe our own sideline reporters can quantify Fergy's success rate: times thrown to, # of potential catches, # of catches, # of drops, # of give-ups, # of fighting for it, etc....
    couldn't agree more with this...I think it was on the JS board that "aaron rodgers looked horrible, didn't have a clue" at yesterday's practice....Rodgers threw like 3 incomplete passes the entire afternoon, and I thought looked really sharp. Of course the guy who wrote that has been a Rodgers basher from the start.
    "I would love to have a guy that always gets the key hit, a pitcher that always makes his best pitch and a manager that can always make the right decision. The problem is getting him to put down his beer and come out of the stands and do those things." - Danny Murraugh

    Comment


    • #32
      Re: Ferguson at it again

      Originally posted by MadtownPacker
      Nah, dont get rid of him. Just make him return KOs and be the gunner on STs. If he cant find his spine doing that then give him the boot.

      Fergy counts 2.8 mil against the cap if he makes the team, 1.4 mil if Tt cuts him. At that kind of money, he has to at least be one of the top 3 WR's to justify a roster spot. You can't justify that kind of money for a special teams guy.
      I can't run no more
      With that lawless crowd
      While the killers in high places
      Say their prayers out loud
      But they've summoned, they've summoned up
      A thundercloud
      They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

      Comment


      • #33
        They have plenty of cap room, and the longer you can wait to cut a guy, the less cap space it ends up eating up. If we cut him now, it's going to hurt us on the cap next year. If we wait a year, it will hurt us on later years but with a lesser penalty. If he's one of the five best wideouts on the roster, he'll be on the team--unless they can find somebody that they think is better that gets cut on another team.
        "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

        Comment


        • #34
          I think we're going to see some real surprises when it comes to final cuts this year. I'm guessing TT isn't acquiring a bunch of draft picks and young FAs every year so that they can get beat out by "never-were's" and "never-will-be's" on a rebuilding team, especially for 10-times the cap charge. IMO, Ferguson fits in that category.
          Click the stop button in IE or hit ESC to stop the moving avatars.- Zool

          Comment


          • #35
            Fergy is nothing more than a #4.
            TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Lare
              I think we're going to see some real surprises when it comes to final cuts this year. I'm guessing TT isn't acquiring a bunch of draft picks and young FAs every year so that they can get beat out by "never-were's" and "never-will-be's" on a rebuilding team, especially for 10-times the cap charge. IMO, Ferguson fits in that category.
              This is an excellent point!

              Comment

              Working...
              X