Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Clifton re-signed

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Wow glad I was wrong, thought he would be a redskin for sure. Still don't think drafting a OT in the first is out of the question with Clifton's injury issues. Bears getting Peppers put the pressure on TT to get this deal done.

    Comment


    • #47
      I don't think the Clifton signing will have any impact on whether TT takes an OT in Round 1. It's doubtful anyone available at #23 was going to start as a rookie at LT anyway.
      I can't run no more
      With that lawless crowd
      While the killers in high places
      Say their prayers out loud
      But they've summoned, they've summoned up
      A thundercloud
      They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by Joemailman
        I don't think the Clifton signing will have any impact on whether TT takes an OT in Round 1. It's doubtful anyone available at #23 was going to start as a rookie at LT anyway.


        BPA all the way.

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by Scott Campbell
          Originally posted by Joemailman
          I don't think the Clifton signing will have any impact on whether TT takes an OT in Round 1. It's doubtful anyone available at #23 was going to start as a rookie at LT anyway.


          BPA all the way.
          +1

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by pbmax
            Originally posted by Gunakor
            We don't need a sack specialist to play opposite CMIII. We just need a guy who will create pressure, demand double teams, and allow guys like CMIII and Cullen Jenkins to make plays. I'm fine with Brad Jones in that role, and I think he'll keep getting better at it if given an opportunity to get with the #1's. I won't be hugely devastated if we don't spend a day one pick on a new OLB. I'm hoping that day one brings us a new OT and a new CB.
            How is someone supposed to draw double teams as a LB if you are not a sack specialist? Teams rarely double team an LB on running plays.
            You create pressure. You don't have to always get the sack, just always be in the QB's face. That's what I meant.
            Chuck Norris doesn't cut his grass, he just stares at it and dares it to grow

            Comment


            • #51
              Really happy to see him here. As a fan, I hate losing players who have spent so much time in the Packers uniform. (Unless of course they're backstabbing divas.)

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by MichiganPackerFan
                Really happy to see him here. As a fan, I hate losing players who have spent so much time in the Packers uniform. (Unless of course they're backstabbing divas.)
                Agreed...Damn Antonio Freeman!!!!
                Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by Tony Oday
                  Originally posted by MichiganPackerFan
                  Really happy to see him here. As a fan, I hate losing players who have spent so much time in the Packers uniform. (Unless of course they're backstabbing divas.)
                  Agreed...Damn Antonio Freeman!!!!
                  I was referring to Dorsey Levens.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X