Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Favre Indecision

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: Favre Indecision

    Originally posted by MadtownPacker
    Is Fremont, OH a cold place? Just curious cuz thats where he is from.

    Guess TT just needs to sweeten the pot and Woodson will forget all about Chucky. Then Favre can say "I like Polar Bear" and announce he is coming back after the Pack trades down and loads up on picks.
    Yup! One brings the other and Favre and one year could change real fast if the Packers do re-bound.

    Now in that statement I'm in my world not TT's. I really believe that the signs do point to Ted wanting Favre gone ASAP and it's just that way and noone will ever admit where it came from.

    Scott Campbell said a few days ago.Maybe in 20 year's Ted Thompson writes a tell all book but he'd have to write better than he speaks.Got it !

    Maybe Brett will pen it for him?
    ** Since 2006 3 X Pro Pickem' Champion; 4 X Runner-Up and 3 X 3rd place.
    ** To download Jesus Loves Me ring tones, you'll need a cell phone mame
    ** If God doesn't fish, play poker or pull for " the Packers ", exactly what does HE do with his buds?
    ** Rather than love, money or fame - give me TRUTH: Henry D. Thoreau

    Comment


    • #17
      Harvey you say that Rodgers does not look ready? How do you know? Explain yourself please.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by ChubbyHubby
        Harvey you say that Rodgers does not look ready? How do you know? Explain yourself please.
        Well, I have no facts to back me up, but I felt it would be good for him to sit behind Favre for a couple of years--like Hasselbeck, Brunell, and Brooks. Then again, I've never been a big fan of his. He didn't exactly do much in preseason or his short stint in the regular season last year. Until he shows me something in the preseason, I won't believe he's ready. If the Packers thought Rodgers was ready, I would think this whole offseason would go differently. I don't think they'd be as patient with Favre. They still feel Favre gives them the best option to win--despite his 29 picks last year.
        "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: Favre Indecision

          Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
          I've stuck up for Brett, and I don't think his waivering has anything more to do with him not knowing if he wants to return to a bad team. However, I can't help but feel that his indecision is hurting the Packers chances at getting Charles Woodson. Woodson has to know that this team has little chance at the playoffs without Favre. With Favre, they could rebound if with their resignings and signing of Pickett and Manuel, they get their injured guys back, and they have a good draft.
          Thats exactly what I was saying in the Woodson thread. You can't blame him for not wanting to come here when Tampa appears to have the MUCH better team with a lot less drama. Even if Brett does come back, how is the JWalk situation going to work out between those 2? Too many unknowns. Not a situation a free agent really wants to walk into. You have to put yourself in their shoes too. Not too mention the bonus of temps in the 60's-70's in the winter vs zeros..
          www.ccso228@twitter.com

          Comment


          • #20
            No doubt. That's why they need to overspend a little to get FAs right now. They don't have to get a bunch, but a guy like Woodson could really help this defense become a legitimately good defense. They are in position to frontload the contract without hurting their future cap much.
            "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
              Originally posted by ChubbyHubby
              Harvey you say that Rodgers does not look ready? How do you know? Explain yourself please.
              Well, I have no facts to back me up, but I felt it would be good for him to sit behind Favre for a couple of years--like Hasselbeck, Brunell, and Brooks. Then again, I've never been a big fan of his. He didn't exactly do much in preseason or his short stint in the regular season last year. Until he shows me something in the preseason, I won't believe he's ready. If the Packers thought Rodgers was ready, I would think this whole offseason would go differently. I don't think they'd be as patient with Favre. They still feel Favre gives them the best option to win--despite his 29 picks last year.
              Thanks Havey for the explanation.

              If Favre does come back many assume that it will be just for this year and he'll hang it up. I agree that Rodgers didn't impress me either last year. With M3 QB camp this year and Rodgers participation should help him improve greatly. Rodgers have to come into this year as though he will be the starter. Unlike the mentioned QB's that sat while Favre was QB wil not happen with Rodgers. I remember like it was yesterday that "the Majik man" got injured on a sack and the Back up at the time Brett Favre came in... Everyone was mis pronouncing his name wrong. He was wild in that first game, Throwing balls WAY out of bounds, very sloppy however they did win that game and as they say "THE REST IS HISTORY...." Who would have thought after that first game replacing the Majik Man during that game Favre would be entering his 15th season accoplishing 3 MVP's having won SuperBowl. Is Aarron Rodgers the Next Brett Favre? NO but he is our next QB.

              Comment

              Working...
              X