Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

LT and the 2010 Draft

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • LT and the 2010 Draft

    We all know the importance of having a LT in this league. With that, I think most of us are hoping that we select one with our first pick in the upcoming draft.
    IMO there are 4 LT candidates who are no brainers if they happen to be available at 23 (I'm well aware that most have no chance of making it there):

    Russell Okung
    Brian Bulaga
    Trent Williams
    Anthony Davis

    Knowing that all of these guys have little chance of making it to 23, I would include 3 other guys I might consider at 23 who could (possibly) be a LT:

    Bruce Campbell
    Mike Iupati
    Charles Brown

    IMO, Any other LT prospect would be a reach at 23.

    My question for discussion is: Do we automatically take one of these guys if they are there at 23 or do we try to fill another position if we feel someone else provides better value.

    My Opinion: Of the guys I think may be available at 23, there are a few guys I would probably take before I would take one of 3 "next tier" guys. They include:

    Ryan Mathews
    Sergio Kindle
    Brandon Graham
    Earl Thomas
    Devin McCourty

    What do you thnk?
    Fred's Slacks is a Winner!

  • #2
    I completely agree with you; I am not sure the next three on your list are good values at 23.

    I think we should go BPA; although if one of the top 4 make it to us we select them.
    TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: LT and the 2010 Draft

      Originally posted by Fred's Slacks
      We all know the importance of having a LT in this league. With that, I think most of us are hoping that we select one with our first pick in the upcoming draft.
      IMO there are 4 LT candidates who are no brainers if they happen to be available at 23 (I'm well aware that most have no chance of making it there):

      Russell Okung
      Brian Bulaga
      Trent Williams
      Anthony Davis

      Knowing that all of these guys have little chance of making it to 23, I would include 3 other guys I might consider at 23 who could (possibly) be a LT:

      Bruce Campbell
      Mike Iupati
      Charles Brown

      IMO, Any other LT prospect would be a reach at 23.

      My question for discussion is: Do we automatically take one of these guys if they are there at 23 or do we try to fill another position if we feel someone else provides better value.

      My Opinion: Of the guys I think may be available at 23, there are a few guys I would probably take before I would take one of 3 "next tier" guys. They include:

      Ryan Mathews
      Sergio Kindle
      Brandon Graham
      Earl Thomas
      Devin McCourty

      What do you thnk?

      not sure I'd take McCourty quite that high.......but of the others

      Kindle would be a great fit
      Graham exciting
      Matthews and Grant a great 1-2 punch
      Thomas a nice fit
      TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

      Comment


      • #4
        I suspect that Brandon Graham is the guy most likely to be available that TT covets. He has pointed out in the past that Clifton was a 2nd round pick, so it's not a given you need to use a 1st to replace him.

        Graham is more a football player than elite athlete. Contrast that to a guy like Campbell who is just the opposite. If TT stays at pick 23, I'll be surprised if the Pick is an OT.
        I can't run no more with that lawless crowd
        While the killers in high places say their prayers out loud
        But they've summoned, they've summoned up a thundercloud
        They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: LT and the 2010 Draft

          Originally posted by Bretsky
          not sure I'd take McCourty quite that high.......but of the others

          Kindle would be a great fit
          Graham exciting
          Matthews and Grant a great 1-2 punch
          Thomas a nice fit
          Yeah, McCourty has just entered my radar lately for a possibility at 23 and I've really started to like him. Usually when I just start to like a prospect I over value him at first. That may be the case here but right now, I like him.
          Fred's Slacks is a Winner!

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: LT and the 2010 Draft

            Originally posted by Fred's Slacks
            Originally posted by Bretsky
            not sure I'd take McCourty quite that high.......but of the others

            Kindle would be a great fit
            Graham exciting
            Matthews and Grant a great 1-2 punch
            Thomas a nice fit
            Yeah, McCourty has just entered my radar lately for a possibility at 23 and I've really started to like him. Usually when I just start to like a prospect I over value him at first. That may be the case here but right now, I like him.

            I've watched highlights of him lately on NFL Network and IMO he is impressive. He'll be a very good player and I think he's climbing into round one. If I was making a mock draft today I think I'd have the Vikings picking him.
            TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

            Comment


            • #7
              At first I thought we had to take a LT in the 1st round but after signing Clifton and Taushcer and having Lang backing up both tackle spots I believe we should draft BPA and get a O-line help later in the draft.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Brandon494
                At first I thought we had to take a LT in the 1st round but after signing Clifton and Taushcer and having Lang backing up both tackle spots I believe we should draft BPA and get a O-line help later in the draft.
                agreed

                we are no longer in a "have to" situation with that first pick after resigning the two tackles

                but i would still like to see one taken in the second or third

                BPA in the first

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: LT and the 2010 Draft

                  Originally posted by Fred's Slacks
                  We all know the importance of having a LT in this league. With that, I think most of us are hoping that we select one with our first pick in the upcoming draft.
                  IMO there are 4 LT candidates who are no brainers if they happen to be available at 23 (I'm well aware that most have no chance of making it there):

                  Russell Okung
                  Brian Bulaga
                  Trent Williams
                  Anthony Davis

                  Knowing that all of these guys have little chance of making it to 23, I would include 3 other guys I might consider at 23 who could (possibly) be a LT:

                  Bruce Campbell
                  Mike Iupati
                  Charles Brown

                  IMO, Any other LT prospect would be a reach at 23.

                  My question for discussion is: Do we automatically take one of these guys if they are there at 23 or do we try to fill another position if we feel someone else provides better value.

                  My Opinion: Of the guys I think may be available at 23, there are a few guys I would probably take before I would take one of 3 "next tier" guys. They include:

                  Ryan Mathews
                  Sergio Kindle
                  Brandon Graham
                  Earl Thomas
                  Devin McCourty

                  What do you thnk?
                  I think it's a good crop of LT's in this draft, (thank God), some mocks even have Bulaga dropping to 23. One guy that intrigues me is Jared Veldheer, I know he's Division II but the guy won't have to contribute right away, he could be a stud LT for years to come: http://nfl.fanhouse.com/2010/02/27/d...intriguing-pl/
                  I don't think he'll last past the 1st round.
                  I also like:
                  Taylor Mays
                  Joe Hayden
                  Golden Tate
                  Kyle Wilson
                  Jerry Hughes
                  Thanks Ted!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: LT and the 2010 Draft

                    Originally posted by packrulz
                    I think it's a good crop of LT's in this draft, (thank God), some mocks even have Bulaga dropping to 23. One guy that intrigues me is Jared Veldheer, I know he's Division II but the guy won't have to contribute right away, he could be a stud LT for years to come: http://nfl.fanhouse.com/2010/02/27/d...intriguing-pl/
                    I don't think he'll last past the 1st round.
                    I also like:
                    Taylor Mays
                    Joe Hayden
                    Golden Tate
                    Kyle Wilson
                    Jerry Hughes
                    I shuddered a little watching that video of him power cleaning 425. Terrible form, he's going to end up like Harrell. He possesses a lot of power to get the weight up like that though. Very intriguing player. Can't see us taking him at 23 but if we traded back a little he might be a nice find.
                    Fred's Slacks is a Winner!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Bold teams need a LT:

                      1 St. Louis
                      2 Detroit

                      3 Tampa Bay
                      4 Washington
                      5 Kansas City
                      6 Seattle

                      7 Cleveland
                      8 Oakland
                      9 Buffalo

                      10 Jacksonville
                      11 Denver
                      12 Miami
                      13 San Francisco
                      14 Seattle
                      15 N.Y. Giants
                      16 Tennessee
                      17 San Francisco
                      18 Pittsburgh
                      19 Atlanta
                      20 Houston
                      21 Cincinnati
                      22 New England
                      23 Green Bay
                      24 Philadelphia
                      25 Baltimore
                      26 Arizona
                      27 Dallas
                      28 San Diego
                      29 N.Y. Jets
                      30 Minnesota
                      31 Indianapolis
                      32 New Orleans

                      Does it look to anyone else like LT might be an important position? Anyway, the good thing here is that if one of the "big 4" slip past Seattle at 14, we may have a shot. If Detroit doesn't take Okung, then that may open the door as all other takles then slide a bit.
                      Fred's Slacks is a Winner!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: LT and the 2010 Draft

                        Originally posted by Fred's Slacks
                        Originally posted by packrulz
                        I think it's a good crop of LT's in this draft, (thank God), some mocks even have Bulaga dropping to 23. One guy that intrigues me is Jared Veldheer, I know he's Division II but the guy won't have to contribute right away, he could be a stud LT for years to come: http://nfl.fanhouse.com/2010/02/27/d...intriguing-pl/
                        I don't think he'll last past the 1st round.
                        I also like:
                        Taylor Mays
                        Joe Hayden
                        Golden Tate
                        Kyle Wilson
                        Jerry Hughes
                        I shuddered a little watching that video of him power cleaning 425. Terrible form, he's going to end up like Harrell. He possesses a lot of power to get the weight up like that though. Very intriguing player. Can't see us taking him at 23 but if we traded back a little he might be a nice find.
                        Someone please coach this guy before he destroys himself. When he cocked his left leg out to the side I thought it was all over.

                        Strong brute though.
                        C.H.U.D.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Interesting look at who does and doesn't need tackles. It could help us in the 1st round (letting a premier guy slip) and it could help us in the 2nd round, letting a really good prospect slip.


                          It appears we may be in a good value spot for tackles.



                          There's a guy named Rodger Saffold, projected in the 2nd that looks pretty good. Maybe with all of those teams before us not needing OL, we could land a quality 2nd round tackle. Jared Veldheer looks like a high upside tackle too. He could be had 2nd or later.
                          Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Joemailman
                            I suspect that Brandon Graham is the guy most likely to be available that TT covets. He has pointed out in the past that Clifton was a 2nd round pick, so it's not a given you need to use a 1st to replace him.

                            Graham is more a football player than elite athlete. Contrast that to a guy like Campbell who is just the opposite. If TT stays at pick 23, I'll be surprised if the Pick is an OT.
                            Everyone here knows my opinion on LT's (if they bother reading what I type), but that being said I think you are dead on. Graham is exactly what the doctor ordered and could very well slip to us. Like Mathews last year, many have said he is the best pass rusher in this draft. We happen to have a need at OLB (and pass rush).

                            The OT's that slip are considered projects of sorts. I recently read an article that said the measurables (not production mind you) on this years OT class are off the charts. Something like NINE of them match up to the big 4 from last year. TT may move up in the second or make some other type of trade to get one of them, but another pass rushing OLB will make our entire D look pretty scary.
                            The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Since the Packers signed Clifton they are not as desperate for 2010 to find a starting caliber LT in the draft. If they needed to do that, last year was the year for that. I see some decent prospects but nothing that would leave me to believe that a player at 23 could come in and do as well as an aging Clifton.

                              This was a bad year in terms of free agent left tackles, Clifton was the best one out there.

                              I think if the Packers are smart they go with a best player available approach in the first round, and then look to upgrade the depth at left tackle in the second or third round. In reality they have no back up for Clifton, and I bet dollar to donuts that Clifton doesn't start all 16 regular season games, and someone that has a bit more talent than a 7th round pick would be a better fit for Rodgers blind side.

                              TJ Lang should be groomed to be the next right tackle for the Packers. I think he could become a pro bowler there, I think he could be a decent left tackle, but I think he could really turn some heads as a right tackle. The Packers need to get there offensive line organized, because Lang will suffer in his development if the Packers ask him to learn and play four out of five positions. This approach by the Packers has actually slowed the growing process of Spitz, Colledge, and Barbre. I really hope the have Lang concentrate on one position, and one position only.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X