Vote for which player we should draft for the Packers.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Packerats 2010 Mock Draft runoff vote:
Collapse
X
-
Anthony Davis. Defensive backs are third in my version of the Packers' needs. Since I don't know enough about their physical gifts to call one a clear BPA, I am going need. He may not start, he may not even play RT initially, but the Pack need another tackle, especially a Left Tackle candidate.
Second on the list is a pass rusher. Third is DB.Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
-
I like both really, I don't think you could go wrong with either one, but I think protecting ARod's blindside is paramount, and Davis is a bulldozer in the running game too, so I went with Davis in this situation, to be the future left tackle.Thanks Ted!
Comment
-
I would rather have Kyle Wilson and Roger Saffold than Anthony Davis and maybe Kareem Jackson.I can't run no more
With that lawless crowd
While the killers in high places
Say their prayers out loud
But they've summoned, they've summoned up
A thundercloud
They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen
Comment
-
+1Originally posted by JustinHarrellDavis is a habitual underachiever and overweight player. Wilson.
This guy hasn't even been paid yet, you think he will change his ways after he gets money? NO way. I want a football player, not a fat SOB who can't even who up to his pro day. Thats why I picked Wilson. Woodson is 34 and Harris is 35 coming off a ACL injury and won't be ready by the start of the season. The only CB that is proven outside of those two is Tramon Williams. Not only will he add talent that we need at the CB position but he will also greatly help on special teams in the return game. Really want to waste our 1st rounder on a guy who will sit on the bench his first year when we have a chance to go deep in the playoffs? No thanks, we can find a tackle prospect later in the draft.
Comment
-
I'll overlook a lot of things if a guy can play football. . .
An extremely slow receiver (boldin) yep, I'll take him
A tiny safety (Sanders) yep, I'll take him
A small, not too fast, small school reciever (Driver) yep. . .
If they can play football, I'll overlook just about anything
A guy who doesn't care enough about football to stay in shape? I wouldn't do it, not in a loaded draft with several other great players who are committed to being a pro. Let the Raiders take him. He'll fit right in with Jamarcus Russell, the uber talented, can't miss QB who wasn't in good shape, but was physically gifted at the all important position. You can't teach physical talent. You can get a guy in shape, right?
I disagree. You can't teach work ethic and attitude. Either you have it or you don't. A guy can get bigger, faster, stronger. If he's a slug, there is nothing you can do, no amount of money. Nothing. He's a slug. Maybe he'll turn it around, but I'm not going to bet a 23rd pick on a guy whos been nothing but a slug to this point.Formerly known as JustinHarrell.
Comment
-
There would be others I'd probably take over Davis as well so this is a fairly easy callTERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER
Comment
-
neitherSwede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.
Comment
-
Can we draft an O line Coach?Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.
Comment

Comment