Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A poll on Bulaga's role

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Voted BB as a guard. More comfortable if TT took a pure lt prospect.

    Comment


    • #17
      He should be groomed at tackle exclusively. He's got tackle feet, so no reason to turn him into a guard. Left or right side, it doesn't really matter right now, so long as he eventually ends up on the left.
      </delurk>

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by rbaloha
        Voted BB as a guard. More comfortable if TT took a pure lt prospect.
        We drafted Bryan Bulaga not Mike Iupati...

        Not sure where all this guard talk is coming from besides talk about maybe getting him on the field earlier. He's not a guard at all. How could he be? Cracking me up man come on

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by mission
          Originally posted by rbaloha
          Voted BB as a guard. More comfortable if TT took a pure lt prospect.
          We drafted Bryan Bulaga not Mike Iupati...

          Not sure where all this guard talk is coming from besides talk about maybe getting him on the field earlier. He's not a guard at all. How could he be? Cracking me up man come on
          I think people are standing on their heads and mistaking his floor (starting caliber left guard) for his ceiling (pro bowl left tackle).
          </delurk>

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Lurker64
            He should be groomed at tackle exclusively. He's got tackle feet, so no reason to turn him into a guard. Left or right side, it doesn't really matter right now, so long as he eventually ends up on the left.
            We need him on the left side right now. Playing him on the right side, with the attitude that "IF" we need him on the left, he can just switch. I don't like that at all. Not for that position.
            Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by mission
              Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby
              Originally posted by vince
              I agree that LT only is the best case, but I think Bulaga will be a better RT next year, if needed, than Lang. .
              You really don't want a rookie to play. Whatever the configuration, you need good backups at both LT and RT to be ready when the very old guys go down. Best bet is to keep working Bulaga at LT and play him only if and when Clifton gets an owie.
              I agree with the majority that we don't want guys being swapped all over the place but I have hard time believing Buluga is not one of our top 5 best offensive lineman right now.
              I agree that he may be one of our top 5 linemen. But I don't know if playing him at guard would make up our best alignment up front. It's about having the best offensive line, not having the best offensive linemen.
              Chuck Norris doesn't cut his grass, he just stares at it and dares it to grow

              Comment


              • #22
                After the LT/LG fiasco with Colledge (built a body type for LG play then asked to sub at LT), LT for Bulaga. Hopefully Colldge can get back up to snuff at LG.
                sigpic

                Comment


                • #23
                  Get him ready at tackle and if it's clear he should be starting start him at Guard
                  TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Bretsky
                    Get him ready at tackle and if it's clear he should be starting start him at Guard
                    And turn him into the next Daryn Colledge...

                    He's a tackle. He needs practice as a tackle. He needs to learn as a tackle. A tackle is not a guard, so no matter how good an offensive lineman is he should not be coached at 2 entirely different OL positions. If he's a future long term tackle it makes no sense to confuse him by teaching him something entirely different. Even if our interior line suffers this season because of it, it makes absolutely no sense to me.
                    Chuck Norris doesn't cut his grass, he just stares at it and dares it to grow

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X