Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Proving the uselessness of immediately judging a draft

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Proving the uselessness of immediately judging a draft

    It's always fun to read grades and discuss the draft immediately after the fact, but you never know what happens. That's why it's really useless to judge it until at least three years have elapsed.

    CBS Sports' Pete Prisco just reassessed the 2007 draft. It was hard to locate many that he was spot on about.

    His assessment of all 32 teams as written in 2007 is here:

    Green Bay Packers

    Best pick: Justin Harrell. Yes, their first pick. He will be a force in the middle of their line.

    Questionable move: Nebraska running back Brandon Jackson is a need pick, but he runs a little upright.

    Second-day gem: Fifth-round pick David Clowney has blazing speed. If he can improve his route running, he could be a nice addition.

    Overall grade: B
    His reassessment of that draft is here:

    Green Bay Packers

    The Packers took defensive tackle Justin Harrell in the first round. He has started two games in three seasons and missed last season with a back injury. He has been a major flop. Second-round pick Brandon Jackson has been mainly a backup running back. The best picks are third-rounder James Jones, a receiver, fullback Korey Hall, who came in the sixth round, and kicker Mason Crosby, who also came in the sixth. The last two are starters. Fifth-round pick Allen Barbre did start seven games on the offensive line last season. The miss on Harrell is what really sets this grade back. He was taken with the 16th overall pick. Jackson hasn't done enough either.

    Grade: C+
    It's fun to look back at these. Hope our 2010 grades out well in 2013!

  • #2
    I will never forget that pick. I was sitting in a rental car in Waterloo Iowa listening to the draft on ESPN radio. When I heard the pick, I was like "WHO?"

    Today, I wish I was still thinking, "WHO?" but sadly I know exactly who he is....

    Comment


    • #3
      The most frustrating thing to me is that the back wasn't an issue for him in college. And his college injury hasn't recurred since he became a pro. Every report I've read says he's worked as hard as possible to recover. It seems it was more bad luck than anything.

      Comment


      • #4
        "If it weren't for bad luck, I'd have no luck at all. Doom, despair, and agony on me...."

        Comment


        • #5
          Grade is still yet to be determined. Jones, Hall, Jackson and Crosby's careers aren't really defined yet.


          Worst case, it's probably about a D. Best case, it could work into a B. Thompson's worst draft though. He's averaging a star in every draft and 2 or 3 solid starters.

          Over time that adds up. Eventually you have 7 or 8 stars with a lot of good players around them.
          Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

          Comment


          • #6
            The best turnaround ever for a draft grade was the 2005 Vikings draft. It was nearly universally given an A or an A- right after it happened, and was downgraded to an F about three years later. I don't think I've ever seen such a dramatic turnaround.
            </delurk>

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Lurker64
              The best turnaround ever for a draft grade was the 2005 Vikings draft. It was nearly universally given an A or an A- right after it happened, and was downgraded to an F about three years later. I don't think I've ever seen such a dramatic turnaround.
              Had to look it up, but you are totally right:
              Round Pick Player Pos School
              1 7(7) Troy Williamson WR South Carolina
              1 18(18) Erasmus James DE Wisconsin
              2 17(49) Marcus Johnson OG Ole Miss
              3 16(80) Dustin Fox CB Ohio St.
              4 11(112) Ciatrick Fason HB Florida
              6 17(191) C.J. Mosley DT Missouri
              7 5(219) Adrian Ward CB UTEP


              (Does anyone know how to actually post these in a table?)

              At the same time, Green Bay was grabbing Rodgers, Collins and Poppinga.

              However, the Packers 2001-2004 drafts were pretty horrific too. With the exceptions of Scott Wells (2004 7th round gem), Barnett (2003), Kampman (2002), there were NO other players in those four years.

              Comment


              • #8
                It's ALL useless, but we do it anyway because it's entertaining.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by MichiganPackerFan
                  However, the Packers 2001-2004 drafts were pretty horrific too. With the exceptions of Scott Wells (2004 7th round gem), Barnett (2003), Kampman (2002), there were NO other players in those four years.
                  Oh sure, those are some bad drafts. The thing that's notable about the 2005 Vikings draft is not that it failed to yield any notable performers, it's that all of the "experts" missed so badly on evaluating it. The consensus had it as one of, if not the, best draft in 2005 immediately after it happened, and three years later it ended up as one of the worst.

                  It just illustrates the absurdity of grading drafts right after they happen. Around half of all players, no matter how good we think they're going to be, just aren't going to work out in the NFL. Sometimes you just flip seven coins and get seven tails in a row. It happens.
                  </delurk>

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by JustinHarrell
                    Grade is still yet to be determined. Jones, Hall, Jackson and Crosby's careers aren't really defined yet.
                    I think they are pretty well defined. They're OK, decent, decent, ordinary. They haven't blown the wheels off of anything.

                    The only ??? is whether or not Harrell can turn out to play.

                    The draft is a C-Minus IMHO.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      About the 2007 draft, I'm pretty confident in saying that it's Thompson's worst as a Packer GM. But at least he got something out of it. A running back that can be counted on to block on third down, a #3-4 WR with some upside, a backup fullback, a core special teamer, and a half-way decent kicker aren't chopped liver.

                      Not exactly anything that makes you go back and look at that draft and say "that was amazing", but not uniformly bad.

                      As for the Harrell pick, I think at this point, we can get beyond "looking at what round people were drafted in" and just look at contribution to the team. Harrell's impact has been minimal, but the first round that year was littered with guys who didn't quite work out.

                      I mean, watch just look at Reggie Nelson who a lot of people wanted (myself included).
                      </delurk>

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Ouch on that Reggie Nelson video. Ouch.
                        "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

                        KYPack

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Fritz
                          Ouch on that Reggie Nelson video. Ouch.
                          On the plus side, Yakety Sax makes nearly everything funny.
                          </delurk>

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Yes but see if we didn't all grade drafts the day after they occurred, we wouldn't be able to look back 3 years later and say "Damn, we were way off."

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by channtheman
                              Yes but see if we didn't all grade drafts the day after they occurred, we wouldn't be able to look back 3 years later and say "Damn, we were way off."
                              It is a lot of fun to do and even more fun to look back on, except when the results are Harrell-like.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X