Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Interesting article on broken tackles

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by Gunakor
    So we're talking an additional 5 catches for Grant then.
    No.

    I said get 35-40 catches AND be a threat on the edge. Grant neither is nor ever will be a threat on the edge.

    Honestly, I'd prefer more catches than 35-40 from our #1 RB...balance is the key to an unstoppable offense. It isn't relying exclusively on your receivers, no matter how good they are. And short tosses to the RB in the flat are a remarkable way to slow down a pass rush.

    Your receivers have to be decent blockers in the run game...and your runners have to be decent receivers in the pass game.
    My signature has NUDITY in it...whatcha gonna do?

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by The Leaper
      Originally posted by Gunakor
      So we're talking an additional 5 catches for Grant then.
      No.

      I said get 35-40 catches AND be a threat on the edge. Grant neither is nor ever will be a threat on the edge.

      Honestly, I'd prefer more catches than 35-40 from our #1 RB...balance is the key to an unstoppable offense. It isn't relying exclusively on your receivers, no matter how good they are. And short tosses to the RB in the flat are a remarkable way to slow down a pass rush.

      Your receivers have to be decent blockers in the run game...and your runners have to be decent receivers in the pass game.
      Short passes to a TE slow down a pass rush too. Quick slants to a WR completely eliminate pass rush. You don't NEED your RB to catch a lot of passes or make a living on the edge to have a potent and deadly offense. Again, just look at the 2009 Green Bay Packers as evidence. Or just ignore it, but that's the evidence that disproves your theory as being 100% correct, 100% of the time.

      What we have works. It ain't broken. We aren't going to fix something that ain't broken. This is a DEADLY potent offense. We don't need your pass catching RB to make our offense go. Maybe yours, but not ours. Ours is perfectly fine with Ryan Grant as the workhorse back.

      Whatever, I'm done with this one Leap. Believe what you want. I know what I saw last year.
      Chuck Norris doesn't cut his grass, he just stares at it and dares it to grow

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by Gunakor
        Whatever, I'm done with this one Leap. Believe what you want. I know what I saw last year.
        Yep...lots of sacks allowed. Glad those short passes to the TE and slants to the WRs worked.
        My signature has NUDITY in it...whatcha gonna do?

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by The Leaper
          Originally posted by Gunakor
          Whatever, I'm done with this one Leap. Believe what you want. I know what I saw last year.
          Yep...lots of sacks allowed. Glad those short passes to the TE and slants to the WRs worked.
          461 points scored. 28.8 points per game. I'd say whatever they did worked just fine.

          But you'll never see that side of the argument, so just drop it.
          Chuck Norris doesn't cut his grass, he just stares at it and dares it to grow

          Comment


          • #65
            You guys are both right. If Grant doesn't turn into a legit receiver threat out of the backfield, the promising double TE sets will offset just fine. Even "just" Finley will be what we had last year.

            But take a Ryan Grant and inject some Green genes, couple that with the two TEs and you're unstppable.

            You guys are debating a nice problem to have. It's all good if the OL improves on the latter part of last season even further, regardless.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by Tarlam!
              But take a Ryan Grant and inject some Green genes...
              That's Mr. Green Jeans...

              [QUOTE=George Cumby] ...every draft (Ted) would pick a solid, dependable, smart, athletically limited linebacker...the guy who isn't doing drugs, going to strip bars, knocking around his girlfriend or making any plays of game changing significance.

              Comment

              Working...
              X