-
www.ccso228@twitter.com -
3rd rounder and Hawk Lock it upSwede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship. -
If we didn't play the Bills this week this may have happened already. No sense to trade the guy and then have him score a couple TDs on you the following week."When it's third and ten, you can take the milk drinkers and I'll take the whiskey drinkers every time" Max McGeeComment
-
True lol
I hadn't thought of the fact we're playing them this week. You're right, that would change things, and I'm sure MM is confident of us beating the Bills with or without a back. It gives him a chance to see what BJack can do, as well - if he doesn't perform (with a team having a chance to prepare for him).--
Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...Comment
-
That would be one dumb trade.Originally posted by Tony Oday
As I've said before, Lynch hasn't shown he's any better than Jackson. About all he's got on Jackson is a bunch of people who think he's the player they thought he might be when he was drafted instead of the player he is.
Even given our situation, I still wouldn't give them more than a 5th and Bishop."You're all very smart, and I'm very dumb." - PartialComment
-
why toss in the third rounder? If you make that deal, it should be straight up.Originally posted by Tony Oday
Good thing arod is on board - after all, you need your QB/GM to approve these things, as we've learned..."Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - WoodbuckComment
-
I doubt they would take that.Originally posted by SkinBasket"Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - WoodbuckComment
-
Originally posted by mraynrand
It was a stupid hypothetical question.Comment
-
Originally posted by Scott Campbell
lol I was kidding
Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.Comment
-
I don't think he has to be better than B Jack for a trade of this nature to be worthwhile. He just has to be better than Kuhn. I don't think that Jackson can be an every down back and stay healthy through a playoff run. Lynch would give us breathing room if nothing else.Originally posted by SkinBasket
The Bills are weak at linebacker, but have a strong corp of RBs. We need someone that can take some of the weight off B Jack and have a couple superfluous above average middle LBs. There has to be some sort of mutually beneficial arrangement that can be worked out here.Comment
-
Everyone is so high on Chillar, yet he played like crap sunday, so why not offer him since we're doing the rest of the LB's to trade."I would love to have a guy that always gets the key hit, a pitcher that always makes his best pitch and a manager that can always make the right decision. The problem is getting him to put down his beer and come out of the stands and do those things." - Danny MurraughComment
-
so was I.Originally posted by Tony OdayOriginally posted by Scott Campbell
lol I was kidding"Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - WoodbuckComment
-
I would give serious consideration to offering up a 3rd for the guy. What are you really losing? A Jason Spitz? A Morgan Burnett? An Antonio Freeman? Or a Donnell Washington? By contrast, if Lynch can get his head right he could make the Packer's passing attack that much more potent, and their ability to grind out the clock all the more effective. In a year when most of the important parts seem to be in place for a deep playoff run I would be very tempted to take the gamble.Comment
-
This trade will NEVER, EVER, EVER happen. No go. This isnt TT's style....we all know it....next!Comment
-
I meant the question the reporter asked Rodgers.Originally posted by Tony OdayOriginally posted by Scott Campbell
lol I was kiddingComment
Tweet
Comment