Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

So is this woman being charged for defamation?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • So is this woman being charged for defamation?



    She should get criminal charges against her. She besmirched Sharpe's reputation, and that is huge in the field he is in, with what appears to be lies. She could have wrecked his career, she should be in jail.
    Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

  • #2
    it wouldn't bother me if this trial dragged on longer. I would rather not have to see Shannon Sharpe on a weekly basis!

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Little Whiskey
      it wouldn't bother me if this trial dragged on longer. I would rather not have to see Shannon Sharpe on a weekly basis!
      lol I kind of agree based on his performance but what pisses me off is Rothlisberger gets DESTROYED in the public forum and had NO criminal charges against him. This woman LIES about a guy in the public arena possibly almost getting him fired, with no consequences.
      Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

      Comment


      • #4
        I admire Shannon Sharpe's position in this issue/mattter.

        He no less has created a problem for himself. The problem with his temporary resignation or stepping aside fr. his media job, until his name is cleared. Is that this might drag out for months to over a year and where will he be inspite of his innoscence until proven otherwise?

        It has to severely suck to be him. Who ever claimed that life is easy?
        ** Since 2006 3 X Pro Pickem' Champion; 4 X Runner-Up and 3 X 3rd place.
        ** To download Jesus Loves Me ring tones, you'll need a cell phone mame
        ** If God doesn't fish, play poker or pull for " the Packers ", exactly what does HE do with his buds?
        ** Rather than love, money or fame - give me TRUTH: Henry D. Thoreau

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: So is this woman being charged for defamation?

          Originally posted by Tony Oday
          http://network.yardbarker.com/all_sports/article_external/woman_withdraws_charges_sharpe_case_dismissed/3239440

          She should get criminal charges against her. She besmirched Sharpe's reputation, and that is huge in the field he is in, with what appears to be lies. She could have wrecked his career, she should be in jail.
          I doubt Sharpe will pursue it. He would just rather the story go away.
          I can't run no more
          With that lawless crowd
          While the killers in high places
          Say their prayers out loud
          But they've summoned, they've summoned up
          A thundercloud
          They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Tony Oday
            Originally posted by Little Whiskey
            it wouldn't bother me if this trial dragged on longer. I would rather not have to see Shannon Sharpe on a weekly basis!
            lol I kind of agree based on his performance but what pisses me off is Rothlisberger gets DESTROYED in the public forum and had NO criminal charges against him. This woman LIES about a guy in the public arena possibly almost getting him fired, with no consequences.
            Yeah, Goodell should suspend her for a full 6 games. No reduction of sentence for good time.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by hoosier
              Originally posted by Tony Oday
              Originally posted by Little Whiskey
              it wouldn't bother me if this trial dragged on longer. I would rather not have to see Shannon Sharpe on a weekly basis!
              lol I kind of agree based on his performance but what pisses me off is Rothlisberger gets DESTROYED in the public forum and had NO criminal charges against him. This woman LIES about a guy in the public arena possibly almost getting him fired, with no consequences.
              Yeah, Goodell should suspend her for a full 6 games. No reduction of sentence for good time.
              How about this angle?

              Make her PLAY 6 games.

              Comment


              • #8
                It just pisses me off the double standard here
                Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Just because Roethlisberger didn't have charges filed does not mean nothing happened and he didn't deserve the public scrutiny.
                  "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Tony Oday
                    It just pisses me off the double standard here
                    What are you talking about? You think that because Big Ben didn't go to trial that he didn't do anything wrong? And Sharpe's accuser, what if she is delusional or something? Why do assume that you know enough about the whole thing to be able to say what the legal remedy should be?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by hoosier
                      Originally posted by Tony Oday
                      It just pisses me off the double standard here
                      What are you talking about? You think that because Big Ben didn't go to trial that he didn't do anything wrong? And Sharpe's accuser, what if she is delusional or something? Why do assume that you know enough about the whole thing to be able to say what the legal remedy should be?
                      I am not saying double standard with Big Ben and Sharpe, What I am saying is if a guy did this he would be roasted on a spit and the girl would not have had to take a leave from work.
                      Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Tony Oday
                        Originally posted by hoosier
                        Originally posted by Tony Oday
                        It just pisses me off the double standard here
                        What are you talking about? You think that because Big Ben didn't go to trial that he didn't do anything wrong? And Sharpe's accuser, what if she is delusional or something? Why do assume that you know enough about the whole thing to be able to say what the legal remedy should be?
                        I am not saying double standard with Big Ben and Sharpe, What I am saying is if a guy did this he would be roasted on a spit and the girl would not have had to take a leave from work.
                        That's because violent crime by men toward women is so much more pervasive in this society. Women have a much harder time forcing themselves on men against their will--and men have a much harder time admitting it when it does happen.
                        "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Tony Oday
                          Originally posted by hoosier
                          Originally posted by Tony Oday
                          It just pisses me off the double standard here
                          What are you talking about? You think that because Big Ben didn't go to trial that he didn't do anything wrong? And Sharpe's accuser, what if she is delusional or something? Why do assume that you know enough about the whole thing to be able to say what the legal remedy should be?
                          I am not saying double standard with Big Ben and Sharpe, What I am saying is if a guy did this he would be roasted on a spit and the girl would not have had to take a leave from work.
                          I see. I misunderstood where the second side of the "double standard" was. But I still don't get why you think there is a double standard. It is not too late for the accuser to get charged with some kind of obstruction charge, and Sharpe could certainly sue her for slander if it can be proved that she was making her story up. But slander and rape are not comparable crimes so why should the ways of dealing with them and the consequences be the same?

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by hoosier
                            Sharpe could certainly sue her for slander if it can be proved that she was making her story up
                            that would be effective
                            "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X