Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
So is this woman being charged for defamation?
Collapse
X
-
So is this woman being charged for defamation?
Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.Tags: None
-
lol I kind of agree based on his performance but what pisses me off is Rothlisberger gets DESTROYED in the public forum and had NO criminal charges against him. This woman LIES about a guy in the public arena possibly almost getting him fired, with no consequences.Originally posted by Little Whiskeyit wouldn't bother me if this trial dragged on longer. I would rather not have to see Shannon Sharpe on a weekly basis!
Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.
Comment
-
I admire Shannon Sharpe's position in this issue/mattter.
He no less has created a problem for himself. The problem with his temporary resignation or stepping aside fr. his media job, until his name is cleared. Is that this might drag out for months to over a year and where will he be inspite of his innoscence until proven otherwise?
It has to severely suck to be him. Who ever claimed that life is easy?** Since 2006 3 X Pro Pickem' Champion; 4 X Runner-Up and 3 X 3rd place.
** To download Jesus Loves Me ring tones, you'll need a cell phone mame
** If God doesn't fish, play poker or pull for " the Packers ", exactly what does HE do with his buds?
** Rather than love, money or fame - give me TRUTH: Henry D. Thoreau
Comment
-
Re: So is this woman being charged for defamation?
I doubt Sharpe will pursue it. He would just rather the story go away.Originally posted by Tony Odayhttp://network.yardbarker.com/all_sports/article_external/woman_withdraws_charges_sharpe_case_dismissed/3239440
She should get criminal charges against her. She besmirched Sharpe's reputation, and that is huge in the field he is in, with what appears to be lies. She could have wrecked his career, she should be in jail.I can't run no more
With that lawless crowd
While the killers in high places
Say their prayers out loud
But they've summoned, they've summoned up
A thundercloud
They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen
Comment
-
Yeah, Goodell should suspend her for a full 6 games. No reduction of sentence for good time.Originally posted by Tony Odaylol I kind of agree based on his performance but what pisses me off is Rothlisberger gets DESTROYED in the public forum and had NO criminal charges against him. This woman LIES about a guy in the public arena possibly almost getting him fired, with no consequences.Originally posted by Little Whiskeyit wouldn't bother me if this trial dragged on longer. I would rather not have to see Shannon Sharpe on a weekly basis!
Comment
-
How about this angle?Originally posted by hoosierYeah, Goodell should suspend her for a full 6 games. No reduction of sentence for good time.Originally posted by Tony Odaylol I kind of agree based on his performance but what pisses me off is Rothlisberger gets DESTROYED in the public forum and had NO criminal charges against him. This woman LIES about a guy in the public arena possibly almost getting him fired, with no consequences.Originally posted by Little Whiskeyit wouldn't bother me if this trial dragged on longer. I would rather not have to see Shannon Sharpe on a weekly basis!
Make her PLAY 6 games.
Comment
-
It just pisses me off the double standard hereSwede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.
Comment
-
What are you talking about? You think that because Big Ben didn't go to trial that he didn't do anything wrong? And Sharpe's accuser, what if she is delusional or something? Why do assume that you know enough about the whole thing to be able to say what the legal remedy should be?Originally posted by Tony OdayIt just pisses me off the double standard here
Comment
-
I am not saying double standard with Big Ben and Sharpe, What I am saying is if a guy did this he would be roasted on a spit and the girl would not have had to take a leave from work.Originally posted by hoosierWhat are you talking about? You think that because Big Ben didn't go to trial that he didn't do anything wrong? And Sharpe's accuser, what if she is delusional or something? Why do assume that you know enough about the whole thing to be able to say what the legal remedy should be?Originally posted by Tony OdayIt just pisses me off the double standard hereSwede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.
Comment
-
That's because violent crime by men toward women is so much more pervasive in this society. Women have a much harder time forcing themselves on men against their will--and men have a much harder time admitting it when it does happen.Originally posted by Tony OdayI am not saying double standard with Big Ben and Sharpe, What I am saying is if a guy did this he would be roasted on a spit and the girl would not have had to take a leave from work.Originally posted by hoosierWhat are you talking about? You think that because Big Ben didn't go to trial that he didn't do anything wrong? And Sharpe's accuser, what if she is delusional or something? Why do assume that you know enough about the whole thing to be able to say what the legal remedy should be?Originally posted by Tony OdayIt just pisses me off the double standard here"Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings
Comment
-
I see. I misunderstood where the second side of the "double standard" was. But I still don't get why you think there is a double standard. It is not too late for the accuser to get charged with some kind of obstruction charge, and Sharpe could certainly sue her for slander if it can be proved that she was making her story up. But slander and rape are not comparable crimes so why should the ways of dealing with them and the consequences be the same?Originally posted by Tony OdayI am not saying double standard with Big Ben and Sharpe, What I am saying is if a guy did this he would be roasted on a spit and the girl would not have had to take a leave from work.Originally posted by hoosierWhat are you talking about? You think that because Big Ben didn't go to trial that he didn't do anything wrong? And Sharpe's accuser, what if she is delusional or something? Why do assume that you know enough about the whole thing to be able to say what the legal remedy should be?Originally posted by Tony OdayIt just pisses me off the double standard here
Comment
-
that would be effectiveOriginally posted by hoosierSharpe could certainly sue her for slander if it can be proved that she was making her story up"Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
Comment


Comment