Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lynch-for-Hawk rumors intensify in Buffalo

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by The Shadow
    Sometimes when you are close, and the team is already solid - giving up 2 picks is not nec. a poor decision.
    I completely agree.

    Look at how many good players we had to cut this year at the end of preseason. We don't NEED 7-8 more rookies coming in every year...because 7-8 of them will likely just get cut anyway. OK...I'm exaggerating, but you get the point.

    Go ahead and spend a 2nd/3rd if you must to shore up areas of need...because it is harder to fill needs in the draft than it is to trade picks for needs.
    My signature has NUDITY in it...whatcha gonna do?

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by The Leaper
      Originally posted by The Shadow
      Sometimes when you are close, and the team is already solid - giving up 2 picks is not nec. a poor decision.
      I completely agree.

      Look at how many good players we had to cut this year at the end of preseason. We don't NEED 7-8 more rookies coming in every year...because 7-8 of them will likely just get cut anyway. OK...I'm exaggerating, but you get the point.

      Go ahead and spend a 2nd/3rd if you must to shore up areas of need...because it is harder to fill needs in the draft than it is to trade picks for needs.
      sometimes a solid vetran for other young players can be just as huge...Eugene Robinson?!?
      "I would love to have a guy that always gets the key hit, a pitcher that always makes his best pitch and a manager that can always make the right decision. The problem is getting him to put down his beer and come out of the stands and do those things." - Danny Murraugh

      Comment


      • #18
        Makes sense, although I have to believe Ted's going to give Nance a shot at it before he spends anything. I can't say as I blame him. This offense isn't exactly designed around the running back position. We need solid play there, but this team can still win without more than that.

        Comment


        • #19
          Those wanting to keep hawk need to remember he wants to go too.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by gbgary
            Those wanting to keep hawk need to remember he wants to go too.
            He never said he wants to go. The closest thing he said to that is that he'd be open to a trade. Being open to a trade isn't exactly the same as wanting to be traded. IIRC, he did specifically state that he'd like to remain a Packer.
            Chuck Norris doesn't cut his grass, he just stares at it and dares it to grow

            Comment


            • #21
              I have hopes that we'll contend for a Super Bowl this year, and I think trading our best run defending ILB would be detrimental to that goal. Unless it's a superstar RB (Johnson, Peterson), I think LBs are more valuable than RBs. Then again, I do have concerns about our running game. I'm not adverse to trading for Lynch at the right cost, but I doubt it happens--mainly because Buffalo is probably asking too much for Lynch.
              "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

              Comment


              • #22
                I'm in the camp that thinks trading Hawk would be a mistake. We don't have a lot of starter-quality LBs on the roster, and I don't think TT wants to give up a R2 or R3 pick for Lynch.

                Moreover, Ralph Wilson is cheap, Lynch's salary is very friendly, and he can still be productive for the Bills.

                I think M3 will roll with who he has and hope either Nance or Starks can provide a spark if Jackson and Kuhn get stuck in reverse.

                If (heaven forbid) another injury hits the RB's then I could see a deal.

                I think I read that WAS released Larry Johnson...

                Comment


                • #23
                  Unfortunately this will not happen. The current rb grouping is sufficient.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    What to expect from Starks? He's missed so much time in college & now in Green Bay. I don't think Starks will contribute much this season but do tell me otherwise if you know something on Starks!?

                    We need a Samkon Gado year from Nance - Sam did ok for Packers. Yeah, it's the diamond in rough but TT will not pull trigger on saggy vets or send draft picks for scrubs. I have no problem with that as I'm in the "keep Hawk" camp.

                    BJ gotta step up & play ball - not think it - as he hesitates a wee bit much.

                    Packers won SB with Bennett, Hendo & Levens. YOU GOTTA WORK HARD LIKE THESE PROS.
                    PackerRats Thompson D. Yahoo Fantasy Football Champ 2019,
                    PackerRats Thompson D. Yahoo Fantasy Football Champ 2018,
                    PackerRats Pick'Em 2016-17 Champ + Packers year Survival Football Champ 2017,
                    Rats Yahoo Fantasy Football Champ 2013,
                    Ratz Survival Football Champ 2012,
                    PackerRats1 Yahoo Fantasy Football Champ 2006.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by mmmdk
                      Packers won SB with Bennett, Hendo & Levens. YOU GOTTA WORK HARD LIKE THESE PROS.
                      I'd take that backfield over ours in a heartbeat right now. I'd probably take that backfield over ours with a HEALTHY Grant. Those guys could do ALL components of being a RB/FB.

                      That's the problem with TT's backs...they are always alarmingly deficient in at least one category. I'd rather have a guy like Bennett or Levens who might not be great at any one thing, but is fully capable in everything.

                      I'm sorry...but this team is going to struggle to win a title with our current backfield. It is pathetic.
                      My signature has NUDITY in it...whatcha gonna do?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X