Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How to Beat the Packers (the "I'm Bitter" Thread)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Smidgeon
    9) The unnecessary roughness call on Collins. The runner wasn't down yet.
    But the whistle had clearly blown so the play was over. The panda's forward progress was stopped. Collins should have just let it go but he didn't.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Cleft Crusty
      Originally posted by mmmdk

      McCarthy is a great teacher but a lousy OC - he could still be HC but step down as playcaller. I'd try that but it won't happen.
      What the hell are you talking about? Did you watch the game? The playcalling was outstanding. The Packers moved the ball efficiently and controlled the clock. They should have scored up to 20 more points. McCarthy can't catch perfectly thrown bombs. He can't not grab a small piece of uniform on a TD pass. He can't prevent helmet to helmet contact on a great sack. He can't hold onto the ball for a receiver. He can't prevent offensive interference from being called defensive interference. Etc. etc. Whom do you want to call plays? What evidence do you have that they would be better?
      +1

      Except MM is terrible when it comes to challenges! Someone should hide that red hankerchief away from him on game day!

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Pugger
        Originally posted by Cleft Crusty
        Originally posted by mmmdk

        McCarthy is a great teacher but a lousy OC - he could still be HC but step down as playcaller. I'd try that but it won't happen.
        What the hell are you talking about? Did you watch the game? The playcalling was outstanding. The Packers moved the ball efficiently and controlled the clock. They should have scored up to 20 more points. McCarthy can't catch perfectly thrown bombs. He can't not grab a small piece of uniform on a TD pass. He can't prevent helmet to helmet contact on a great sack. He can't hold onto the ball for a receiver. He can't prevent offensive interference from being called defensive interference. Etc. etc. Whom do you want to call plays? What evidence do you have that they would be better?
        +1

        Except MM is terrible when it comes to challenges! Someone should hide that red hankerchief away from him on game day!
        -1 but not on red flag
        PackerRats Thompson D. Yahoo Fantasy Football Champ 2019,
        PackerRats Thompson D. Yahoo Fantasy Football Champ 2018,
        PackerRats Pick'Em 2016-17 Champ + Packers year Survival Football Champ 2017,
        Rats Yahoo Fantasy Football Champ 2013,
        Ratz Survival Football Champ 2012,
        PackerRats1 Yahoo Fantasy Football Champ 2006.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by mmmdk
          Originally posted by Cleft Crusty
          Originally posted by mmmdk

          McCarthy is a great teacher but a lousy OC - he could still be HC but step down as playcaller. I'd try that but it won't happen.
          What the hell are you talking about? Did you watch the game? The playcalling was outstanding. The Packers moved the ball efficiently and controlled the clock. They should have scored up to 20 more points. McCarthy can't catch perfectly thrown bombs. He can't not grab a small piece of uniform on a TD pass. He can't prevent helmet to helmet contact on a great sack. He can't hold onto the ball for a receiver. He can't prevent offensive interference from being called defensive interference. Etc. etc. Whom do you want to call plays? What evidence do you have that they would be better?
          McCarthy is a lousy headcoach hence he's a lousy OC and 18 penalties is way too much and he throws the red flag blindly.

          McCarthy did ok, even great on two drives but even a blind squirrel finds a nut. But McCarthy is more than just a playcaller, he's HC, he's the backbone of the team. And that shows - badly.

          I've got all his games from his GB tenure & I even followed him in NO (where he showed promise). I know little of his time in SF. He's still not the answer in GB (gut feeling).

          There's no evidence that a new OC would do better; this isn't scientific Mr. Cleft Clumsy. You called out "playcaller" in my post and took it out of context. And that, my clowny friend, was due to you taking this eerily personal on behalf of McCarthy - so be it.
          I sense "the big slide" in your posting, or rather, your-jack-in-box appearances. An advice; when you attack a post then read it all or did you even read the post entirely?...that's as dumb as your attack was but it illustrates it clearly.

          Mike II had the same problem with too many hats as does Mike III...Mike I wanted all the hats in GB, got them in Seattle and he actually nearly did it.
          It won't work! Mike without too many hats might work or the lousiness continues - lousy as in not winning a super bowl.

          NB - Dang, and Mike III isn't even wearing that many hats compared to the other Mikes.
          I don't agree with you at all. I agree with Cleft that the playcalling was excellent. Moving the ball on the Bears wasn't the problem. As far as the penalties, you know they address them in practice. What else is MM suppose to do? It's about discipline from the players to stop fucking it up. It's Shawn Slocum that needs his head on a platter, not MM.
          www.ccso228@twitter.com

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by imscott72
            Stop blaming the officials. Sure there were some poor calls, but teams make their own luck on the field. If the FG doesn't get blocked the game is tied, if JJ doesn't fumble a good chance we win, if our tackles didn't have to hold everybody to block we don't have all those penalties. Lots of things that were in our control that we fucked up.
            Yes, lets stop acting like queen fans. The fellas played like crap and still had a chance to win it but we didn't deserve to win. We'll meet up with those stinkin' bares later on. They played about as well as they can and only won because of our ineptitude. Let's regroup and take out our frustrations on the loins on Sunday.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by imscott72
              Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
              Originally posted by imscott72
              Our tackles are a big problem. Every team is going to see on film now that we have a serious weakness on the OL at the tackle position. It's time to move Clifton to backup. I'm not quite ready to replace Tausch, but it's getting damn close. Get Bulaga in there now.
              I think Tauscher has been even worse than Clifton this year. I'm thinking we may have to get Bulaga ready to start at RT. Sad to see.
              They've both been bad definitely. I'd like to see more Lang at RT. Why they don't start Bulaga is beyond me.
              I'd rather have our tackles hold Peppers rather than have that creap injure Rodgers. Do you truly think Lang and Bulaga would have fared any better against a guy like Peppers?? This is only one game. We'll see those clowns again later on. By then Bulaga and Lang might be ready for a guy like that but they aren't now.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by mmmdk
                Originally posted by Cleft Crusty
                Originally posted by mmmdk

                McCarthy is a great teacher but a lousy OC - he could still be HC but step down as playcaller. I'd try that but it won't happen.
                What the hell are you talking about? Did you watch the game? The playcalling was outstanding. The Packers moved the ball efficiently and controlled the clock. They should have scored up to 20 more points. McCarthy can't catch perfectly thrown bombs. He can't not grab a small piece of uniform on a TD pass. He can't prevent helmet to helmet contact on a great sack. He can't hold onto the ball for a receiver. He can't prevent offensive interference from being called defensive interference. Etc. etc. Whom do you want to call plays? What evidence do you have that they would be better?
                McCarthy is a lousy headcoach hence he's a lousy OC and 18 penalties is way too much and he throws the red flag blindly.

                McCarthy did ok, even great on two drives but even a blind squirrel finds a nut. But McCarthy is more than just a playcaller, he's HC, he's the backbone of the team. And that shows - badly.

                I've got all his games from his GB tenure & I even followed him in NO (where he showed promise). I know little of his time in SF. He's still not the answer in GB (gut feeling).

                There's no evidence that a new OC would do better; this isn't scientific Mr. Cleft Clumsy. You called out "playcaller" in my post and took it out of context. And that, my clowny friend, was due to you taking this eerily personal on behalf of McCarthy - so be it.
                I sense "the big slide" in your posting, or rather, your-jack-in-box appearances. An advice; when you attack a post then read it all or did you even read the post entirely?...that's as dumb as your attack was but it illustrates it clearly.

                Mike II had the same problem with too many hats as does Mike III...Mike I wanted all the hats in GB, got them in Seattle and he actually nearly did it.
                It won't work! Mike without too many hats might work or the lousiness continues - lousy as in not winning a super bowl.

                NB - Dang, and Mike III isn't even wearing that many hats compared to the other Mikes.
                Let's walk through your points. First, I couldn't care less about supporting McCarthy. I can let you know all the things I think are flawed with this guy, but playcalling, coordinating the offense and coaching QBs are not among them.

                I'm sorry I can't put your logic together: "McCarthy is a great teacher but a lousy OC - he could still be HC but step down as playcaller. I'd try that but it won't happen. McCarthy is a lousy headcoach hence he's a lousy OC..."

                And just How many hats is McCarthy wearing (You contrdadict yourself here as well)? He is not the GM and he has a former head coach completely in charge of the defense. In essence, he really only has to worry about the offense. Is that too much for him? Certainly not based on fact. He's had three and half high output offensive seasons, following a year and a half total roster overhaul. What game are you watching?

                You say as HC he is the backbone of the team and it's showing badly. OK, compared to what? Four seasons, 1-2 in two playoff appearances. He's easily in the upper quarter of NFL coaches based on wins/losses and playoff appearances. What is your criteria?

                Gut feeling. OK, go ahead and have this, but it's meaningless. Clefty has lots of gut feelings, but it's mostly indigestion from too much kielbasa and limburger cheese.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Pugger
                  Originally posted by imscott72
                  Stop blaming the officials. Sure there were some poor calls, but teams make their own luck on the field. If the FG doesn't get blocked the game is tied, if JJ doesn't fumble a good chance we win, if our tackles didn't have to hold everybody to block we don't have all those penalties. Lots of things that were in our control that we fucked up.
                  Yes, lets stop acting like queen fans. The fellas played like crap and still had a chance to win it but we didn't deserve to win. We'll meet up with those stinkin' bares later on. They played about as well as they can and only won because of our ineptitude. Let's regroup and take out our frustrations on the loins on Sunday.
                  heh, heh Pugger, send me those fans names and I'll personnally ridicule them.

                  Look, anyone can find calls they didn't like or thought should have been called. The part that tells you there is a problem is that this has become the norm for MMs teams. That is where the problem lies unless you think the players are all bad and I don't think that is the case.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Pugger
                    Originally posted by imscott72
                    Stop blaming the officials. Sure there were some poor calls, but teams make their own luck on the field. If the FG doesn't get blocked the game is tied, if JJ doesn't fumble a good chance we win, if our tackles didn't have to hold everybody to block we don't have all those penalties. Lots of things that were in our control that we fucked up.
                    Yes, lets stop acting like queen fans. The fellas played like crap and still had a chance to win it but we didn't deserve to win. We'll meet up with those stinkin' bares later on. They played about as well as they can and only won because of our ineptitude. Let's regroup and take out our frustrations on the loins on Sunday.
                    The issue is the lopsidedness of the calls. The Bears were doing the exact same thing as the Packers but no flags were flying. THis game should ahve been more like the BALT/GB game last year with 10+ penalties called on both teams.

                    I DVRed so many plays it drove me nuts. The punt return by Hester, D Martin gets grabbed inside his jersey on the shoulder pads misses the tackle by 4 feet and the refs don't throw a flag. (Grunden was giving Hester the love on the super slow-mo replay and in the bottom right hand side of the screen Martins jersey is extended about 8 inches) Briggs launches himself helmet first into Nelson's upper chest and helmet and no call. Clay Mathews gets held and then flung down by the back of his helmet.

                    I can justify most of the calls on the Packers. I just can't justify the non-calls on the Bears.
                    But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.

                    -Tim Harmston

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Home cookin......and I think Blago was involved somehow......or the Mayor.
                      C.H.U.D.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by ThunderDan
                        The issue is the lopsidedness of the calls. The Bears were doing the exact same thing as the Packers but no flags were flying. THis game should ahve been more like the BALT/GB game last year with 10+ penalties called on both teams.

                        I DVRed so many plays it drove me nuts. The punt return by Hester, D Martin gets grabbed inside his jersey on the shoulder pads misses the tackle by 4 feet and the refs don't throw a flag. (Grunden was giving Hester the love on the super slow-mo replay and in the bottom right hand side of the screen Martins jersey is extended about 8 inches) Briggs launches himself helmet first into Nelson's upper chest and helmet and no call. Clay Mathews gets held and then flung down by the back of his helmet.

                        I can justify most of the calls on the Packers. I just can't justify the non-calls on the Bears.
                        Exactly.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by ThunderDan
                          Originally posted by Pugger
                          Originally posted by imscott72
                          Stop blaming the officials. Sure there were some poor calls, but teams make their own luck on the field. If the FG doesn't get blocked the game is tied, if JJ doesn't fumble a good chance we win, if our tackles didn't have to hold everybody to block we don't have all those penalties. Lots of things that were in our control that we fucked up.
                          Yes, lets stop acting like queen fans. The fellas played like crap and still had a chance to win it but we didn't deserve to win. We'll meet up with those stinkin' bares later on. They played about as well as they can and only won because of our ineptitude. Let's regroup and take out our frustrations on the loins on Sunday.
                          The issue is the lopsidedness of the calls. The Bears were doing the exact same thing as the Packers but no flags were flying. THis game should ahve been more like the BALT/GB game last year with 10+ penalties called on both teams.

                          I DVRed so many plays it drove me nuts. The punt return by Hester, D Martin gets grabbed inside his jersey on the shoulder pads misses the tackle by 4 feet and the refs don't throw a flag. (Grunden was giving Hester the love on the super slow-mo replay and in the bottom right hand side of the screen Martins jersey is extended about 8 inches) Briggs launches himself helmet first into Nelson's upper chest and helmet and no call. Clay Mathews gets held and then flung down by the back of his helmet.

                          I can justify most of the calls on the Packers. I just can't justify the non-calls on the Bears.
                          I completely disagree with this whole premis.

                          Sometimes the calls fall your way, and sometimes they don't. Last night they didn't. We lost. Based on the way we played, we deserved to lose.

                          Yeah, there were missed calls, but overall, the Bears played a much more disciplined game than we did.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by retailguy
                            Originally posted by ThunderDan
                            Originally posted by Pugger
                            Originally posted by imscott72
                            Stop blaming the officials. Sure there were some poor calls, but teams make their own luck on the field. If the FG doesn't get blocked the game is tied, if JJ doesn't fumble a good chance we win, if our tackles didn't have to hold everybody to block we don't have all those penalties. Lots of things that were in our control that we fucked up.
                            Yes, lets stop acting like queen fans. The fellas played like crap and still had a chance to win it but we didn't deserve to win. We'll meet up with those stinkin' bares later on. They played about as well as they can and only won because of our ineptitude. Let's regroup and take out our frustrations on the loins on Sunday.
                            The issue is the lopsidedness of the calls. The Bears were doing the exact same thing as the Packers but no flags were flying. THis game should ahve been more like the BALT/GB game last year with 10+ penalties called on both teams.

                            I DVRed so many plays it drove me nuts. The punt return by Hester, D Martin gets grabbed inside his jersey on the shoulder pads misses the tackle by 4 feet and the refs don't throw a flag. (Grunden was giving Hester the love on the super slow-mo replay and in the bottom right hand side of the screen Martins jersey is extended about 8 inches) Briggs launches himself helmet first into Nelson's upper chest and helmet and no call. Clay Mathews gets held and then flung down by the back of his helmet.

                            I can justify most of the calls on the Packers. I just can't justify the non-calls on the Bears.
                            I completely disagree with this whole premis.

                            Sometimes the calls fall your way, and sometimes they don't. Last night they didn't. We lost. Based on the way we played, we deserved to lose.

                            Yeah, there were missed calls, but overall, the Bears played a much more disciplined game than we did.
                            So when a DL jumps on your QB's head well after the play is over right by the ref and there is no call you don't think there is an issue? Zombo goes head to chin and gets called.

                            Nelson gets "crowned" by Briggs with everyone watching and no call? Collins dump Hester on the ground and gets called.

                            Mathews gets thrown to the turf by the back of his helmet? Tauscher gets called on a hold on Peppers for wrapping him up around the head.

                            These are all player safety issues. All of them should have been called.

                            We played sloppy and poorly but should have won. If we had played well also (cleaned up ST and penalties) we win by 17 or more points.
                            But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.

                            -Tim Harmston

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by ThunderDan
                              Originally posted by retailguy
                              Originally posted by ThunderDan
                              Originally posted by Pugger
                              Originally posted by imscott72
                              Stop blaming the officials. Sure there were some poor calls, but teams make their own luck on the field. If the FG doesn't get blocked the game is tied, if JJ doesn't fumble a good chance we win, if our tackles didn't have to hold everybody to block we don't have all those penalties. Lots of things that were in our control that we fucked up.
                              Yes, lets stop acting like queen fans. The fellas played like crap and still had a chance to win it but we didn't deserve to win. We'll meet up with those stinkin' bares later on. They played about as well as they can and only won because of our ineptitude. Let's regroup and take out our frustrations on the loins on Sunday.
                              The issue is the lopsidedness of the calls. The Bears were doing the exact same thing as the Packers but no flags were flying. THis game should ahve been more like the BALT/GB game last year with 10+ penalties called on both teams.

                              I DVRed so many plays it drove me nuts. The punt return by Hester, D Martin gets grabbed inside his jersey on the shoulder pads misses the tackle by 4 feet and the refs don't throw a flag. (Grunden was giving Hester the love on the super slow-mo replay and in the bottom right hand side of the screen Martins jersey is extended about 8 inches) Briggs launches himself helmet first into Nelson's upper chest and helmet and no call. Clay Mathews gets held and then flung down by the back of his helmet.

                              I can justify most of the calls on the Packers. I just can't justify the non-calls on the Bears.
                              I completely disagree with this whole premis.

                              Sometimes the calls fall your way, and sometimes they don't. Last night they didn't. We lost. Based on the way we played, we deserved to lose.

                              Yeah, there were missed calls, but overall, the Bears played a much more disciplined game than we did.
                              So when a DL jumps on your QB's head well after the play is over right by the ref and there is no call you don't think there is an issue? Zombo goes head to chin and gets called.

                              Nelson gets "crowned" by Briggs with everyone watching and no call? Collins dump Hester on the ground and gets called.

                              Mathews gets thrown to the turf by the back of his helmet? Tauscher gets called on a hold on Peppers for wrapping him up around the head.

                              These are all player safety issues. All of them should have been called.

                              We played sloppy and poorly but should have won. If we had played well also (cleaned up ST and penalties) we win by 17 or more points.
                              I'd respect this analysis a whole lot more if we analyzed every game from this angle. But we don't. Things don't get called in every game. There were probably more calls that the Packers could have been penalized for that weren't. But when we win? No one wants to look at what calls were missed. But there are ALWAYS calls that are missed.

                              Player safety issues? Really? That's what you're concerned about? I'm concerned because we lost, and that we looked like crap while doing it.

                              "IF" we did things differently, we might have won by more than 17 points. BUT WE DIDN'T. So, I'm not talking about "if". I'm talking about what I saw last night.

                              I saw our team play the most undisiciplined game of football that I've seen in a while. I saw a lesser talented opponent capitalize on those mistakes, and play a more disciplined game of football last night than we did, and walk away with a victory they shouldn't have had. But they have it. Fair and square by the rules defined by the NFL.

                              None of the rest of this stuff matters to me.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by ThunderDan
                                The issue is the lopsidedness of the calls. The Bears were doing the exact same thing as the Packers but no flags were flying. THis game should ahve been more like the BALT/GB game last year with 10+ penalties called on both teams.

                                I DVRed so many plays it drove me nuts. The punt return by Hester, D Martin gets grabbed inside his jersey on the shoulder pads misses the tackle by 4 feet and the refs don't throw a flag. (Grunden was giving Hester the love on the super slow-mo replay and in the bottom right hand side of the screen Martins jersey is extended about 8 inches) Briggs launches himself helmet first into Nelson's upper chest and helmet and no call. Clay Mathews gets held and then flung down by the back of his helmet.

                                I can justify most of the calls on the Packers. I just can't justify the non-calls on the Bears.
                                The Packers had many non-calls too. It probably shouldn't have been 17 penalties to 3, but it was lopsided more because of the Packers play than because of the refs.

                                I do think they got the short end of the stick, I just think they deserved most of their penalties and I don't think anything excuses the loss.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X