4 man rush, they are not getting enough pressure. I know Bush was playing significant minutes, Martin had to come in for Burnett and Al and Atari are still not on the roster, but 4 man pressure was not getting it done.
They had three sacks, but other times Hill simply had too long. When they blitzed, there was a good chance they would get burned on screens or other short routes. Or a QB scramble.
In the second half, I did see them with a 4 man rush, two LBs in the short middle of the field and the short passing game was less effective due to coverage and quick tackles. If I had to guess, I would think they were playing 4 across coverage short with three in the back out of a nickel. I also assume the Lions were scheming them out of this alignment as I did not see it consistently at the end. But I am not sure they can rely on this alignment since it relies on 4 man pressure and the offense cooperating.
As of now, we have seen a lot of shaky coverage when blitzing. That either needs to change or the Packers need to get home with 4.
They had three sacks, but other times Hill simply had too long. When they blitzed, there was a good chance they would get burned on screens or other short routes. Or a QB scramble.
In the second half, I did see them with a 4 man rush, two LBs in the short middle of the field and the short passing game was less effective due to coverage and quick tackles. If I had to guess, I would think they were playing 4 across coverage short with three in the back out of a nickel. I also assume the Lions were scheming them out of this alignment as I did not see it consistently at the end. But I am not sure they can rely on this alignment since it relies on 4 man pressure and the offense cooperating.
As of now, we have seen a lot of shaky coverage when blitzing. That either needs to change or the Packers need to get home with 4.

Comment