Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Maybe we don't need to trade for a RB

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Man, I hope this kid turns out to be good AND stays healthy.
    "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

    Comment


    • #17
      From watching those highlights the biggest thing that stood out to me was his balance. I'll go on the record and say Starks will be the starting RB by week 10.

      Comment


      • #18
        For comparison purposes - Brandon Jackson college highlights:



        Maybe it's just the video quality, but to me Starks looks a little more impressive and more like a complete back.
        "My problems with him are his vision and tendency to dance instead of pounding a hole." - Harvey Wallbangers

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by superfan
          For comparison purposes - Brandon Jackson college highlights:



          Maybe it's just the video quality, but to me Starks looks a little more impressive and more like a complete back.
          looks a lot more boring than starks

          Comment


          • #20
            How much more waiting for this guy?
            C.H.U.D.

            Comment


            • #21
              he definitely has a very long stride.

              One thing I notice is that he does tend to bounce around looking for a hole. I hope that doesn't translate to the sort of indecisiveness we've seen with BJack - which leads to him getting hit behind the LOS.
              --
              Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Guiness
                he definitely has a very long stride.

                One thing I notice is that he does tend to bounce around looking for a hole. I hope that doesn't translate to the sort of indecisiveness we've seen with BJack - which leads to him getting hit behind the LOS.
                I was thinking the opposite. He's pretty decisive. He jukes in the open field, but he looks like he takes it up in there hard, cuts, and hits the jets.
                "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

                Comment


                • #23
                  IMO Starks looks too slow. Grant has deceptive speed and is a homerun threat.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by mission
                    From what I gathered, he's been healthy. Just a numbers victim.
                    What numbers? Do we have 3-4 Pro Bowl backs on the roster? We ain't got a starting RB at this point. If he was healthy and good enough, he'd be playing. It will be a stretch for this kid to contribute this year IMO.

                    The notion that this kid is going to drop out of the sky and start putting up 125 yard games in week 10 seems crazy to me.
                    My signature has NUDITY in it...whatcha gonna do?

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by The Leaper
                      Originally posted by mission
                      From what I gathered, he's been healthy. Just a numbers victim.
                      What numbers? Do we have 3-4 Pro Bowl backs on the roster? We ain't got a starting RB at this point. If he was healthy and good enough, he'd be playing. It will be a stretch for this kid to contribute this year IMO.

                      The notion that this kid is going to drop out of the sky and start putting up 125 yard games in week 10 seems crazy to me.
                      The numbers that decided we needed 4 TEs and 3 FBs... because, you know, that's so common.

                      We had Ryan Grant who has had such a looooong history of injuries...

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by The Leaper
                        Originally posted by mission
                        From what I gathered, he's been healthy. Just a numbers victim.
                        What numbers? Do we have 3-4 Pro Bowl backs on the roster? We ain't got a starting RB at this point. If he was healthy and good enough, he'd be playing. It will be a stretch for this kid to contribute this year IMO.

                        The notion that this kid is going to drop out of the sky and start putting up 125 yard games in week 10 seems crazy to me.
                        In the words of TT, "We're good there"
                        LOL That should be everyones sig this year.
                        Baah

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Look at all the Viking fans whooping it up over our injuries.

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X