OFFICIAL FAVRE SEXT SCANDAL ROCKS SPORTS WORLD

[woodbuck27]

Woody is now lecturing the owner. There is no doubt in my mind he means well, but it is audacious of him non-the-less.

What are cliffnotes?

Cliffs (ehemals Cliffs Notes, die ursprünglich Cliff's Notes und oft fälschlicherweise, CliffNotes) sind eine Reihe von Studenten Studie Führer zur Verfügung allem in den Vereinigten Staaten. Die Führungen vorzustellen und zu erläutern literarischen und anderen Werken in Form von Flugblättern oder online. Kritiker der Studie Führer behaupten, sie lassen Studenten Bypass Lesen der Literatur zugeordnet. Im Gegensatz dazu behauptet das Unternehmen, das Lesen des Originals zu fördern, und nicht den Blick Studienführer als Ersatz für die Lesung.

Cliffs wurde von einem einheimischen Nebraska benannt Cliff Hillegass im Jahr 1958 begonnen. Er wurde in Nebraska Book Co. of Lincoln, Nebraska, wenn er Jack Cole, der Mitinhaber von Coles, ein Buch Toronto Geschäft traf arbeiten. Coles war auch der Herausgeber einer Reihe von kanadischen Studie Führer genannt Coles Notes. Jack Cole boten die amerikanischen Rechte an Hillegass.

Hillegass und seine Frau Catherine, begann das Geschäft in ihrem Keller bei 511 Eastridge Drive, mit sechzehn William Shakespeare Titel. Cliffs, gibt es heute in Hunderten von Werken. Der Begriff Cliffs hat nun in modernen Sprachgebrauch kommen, wie ein Substantiv für Notizen ähnlicher Art auf den ursprünglichen CliffsNotes Bücher.

Yes I agree. Marlene Dietrich was ... HOT!

GO PACKERS!!

[retailguy]

this thread blows.

[3irty1]

this thread blows.

Yeah because Scotts gone.

[Airin' Rodgers]

this thread blows.

Agreed.

Woodbuck, how is it unfair? I am acknowledging that he had a great 3rd quarter, and start of the fourth quarter. Why can you not acknowledge that he had an atrocious first half, and threw the game-clinching interception

He was 14/34. Well under 50 percent

[vince]

http://www.timesonline.com/sports/sports_details/article/1424/2010/october/10/monday-madden-after-ben-fiasco-nfl-has-to-suspend-favre.html

After Ben fiasco, NFL has to suspend Favre
By: Mark Madden

When NFL commissioner Roger Goodell suspended Ben Roethlisberger despite no charges filed or evidence existing, he painted himself into a corner. With Roethlisberger punished thusly, how can Goodell not penalize everyone who has tangibly broken the NFL’s personal conduct policy?

Goodell has already given free passes to some lesser lights.

But now Goodell faces a huge PR dilemma. Brett Favre stands accused of sexually harassing a fellow New York Jets employee in 2008, leaving a comprehensive trail of video and audio evidence.

The conventional media did its level best to ignore the story, but gonzo website Deadspin.com continued the TMZ-ing of sports by posting damning voice mails, Facebook entries and extremely risqué texts allegedly sent by Favre to Jenn Sterger (now with Versus, then with the Jets’ in-house TV network).

Roethlisberger missed four games based on he-said, she-said. This goes way beyond. There seems little doubt that it’s Favre on the voice mails. The caller has a Mississippi area code; Favre resides in Mississippi. A watch seen in the pornographic “sexts” sent to Sterger matches one often worn by Favre.

Two massage therapists who worked for the Jets during Favre’s tenure are also said to be targets of unwanted and unsolicited sexual advances from Favre.

Sterger is cooperating with the NFL’s investigation. If her evidence is seen as compelling, Favre will be questioned.

But is Goodell willing to suspend a legend? If not, where does that leave the personal conduct policy?

Goodell is a dictator. A dictator is just a con man with power. Goodell doesn’t need to justify. But lots of people are watching very closely, not least of all Mrs. Favre. Brett has probably already called Kobe Bryant’s jeweler.

As a snarky new-age radio host, I see nothing wrong with l’affaire Favre being reported. I saw nothing wrong with Roethlisberger’s troubles being documented, either, though I felt some aspects of what happened were unfair. Deadspin.com has been castigated for taking Favre to task. But Deadspin.com’s reporting has been exemplary, ahead of the curve and has reduced the rest of the media to riding its coattails or scrambling to catch up.

As a forthcoming biography of Mickey Mantle points out, sportswriters stopped ignoring the malfeasance of athletes after the New York Yankees brawled at the Copacabana night club in 1957. Babe Ruth played in the right era.

As for Sterger, you can’t hate Favre for trying. But Favre comes off as begging, and only a moron would scatter so much proof. It’s like Favre wanted to get caught. Forget the conduct policy; Favre looks like a geek.

If Goodell chooses to not suspend Favre, it’s favoritism. The smoking guns are too plentiful.

If Goodell does suspend Favre, Favre’s legacy is tainted. His record-setting consecutive starts streak would end. It wouldn’t be shocking to see Favre quit in a fit of petulance. He’s always exhibited entitlement, and might perversely feel betrayed by the NFL. Favre thinks he does football a favor by playing.

The thought of Randy Moss having maneuvered himself into playing catch with Tarvaris Jackson is more than a bit amusing.

As for the TMZ-ing of sports, one thing seems certain: It won’t stop. Those who cover sports old-school style are likely to fail in the attempt.

No sympathy for Favre. He’s a married man, a grandfather. With his stature comes a certain responsibility — not to the fans, media or football, but to himself and his family. Don’t be a dirty old man.

What Roethlisberger did was ill-advised.

What Favre did was against the law, against NFL rules, against New York Jets policy and just plain dumb.

[Little Whiskey]

this thread blows.

Yeah because Scotts gone.

where did scott go? did he get the boot?

[woodbuck27]

this thread blows.

Agreed.

Woodbuck, how is it unfair? I am acknowledging that he had a great 3rd quarter, and start of the fourth quarter. Why can you not acknowledge that he had an atrocious first half, and threw the game-clinching interception

He was 14/34. Well under 50 percent

First of all I'm not a Vikings fan and I don't give a lick for the result and I had CP's on the JETS in a miserable week in the Pro Pickem.

I wanted to see the Jets win so, Favre and not getting it done in first half....

What Favre did that was negative in the first half has to be anayized in terms not specific to just Favre's performance.

IMO. Favre didn't play bad in the 1st half. He had little chance to play with any effectiveness. He had 2-3 seconds to do 4-5 step dropback pass's. Did you see it ... the game? It was a disaster, but overall I cannot blame Favre; but you go ahead. Everybody else has been shitting on him this week. Blame Favre and fit right in.

*In that half the Vikings were up to their tricks of getting penalties. So no support for offensive flow again in terms of team discipline.

* AP wasn't busting long so the pressure fell to Favre and pass. Again the Viking OL.

* In that first half. THe Vikings had about 35-38 yards of 'O' through five series and it was more wrong than just Favre. Those five series were all 3 and out's.

I watched the Viking's OL carefully and It was nowhere and Favre had little time to set up to throw. He needs on a short drop about 3-3.5 seconds for almost any toss, and he was getting buried as his OL sucked IMO. He even tried to retreat deep behind the LOS and got pursued and trapped. That was hiliarious.

It looked like he was naked (whooops!) wrong choice of words but it's been that kinda week.

Sure blame Favre. It's easy ... just BLAME him.

GO PACK GO!

[MadtownPacker]

this thread blows.

Yeah because Scotts gone.

where did scott go? did he get the boot?

He didnt get shit. He ran off like a lil bitch cuz I requested he not be quoting me on shit I didnt post. Not sure why he hasnt come back.

[MadtownPacker]

Woody, please cut down your post size it's like your trying to compensate for something.

Just messing with you man but seriously, I am starting to skip your post also. They are just too long. Keep it at a paragraph or two and I swear I will read them.

[cheesner]

http://www.timesonline.com/sports/sports_details/article/1424/2010/october/10/monday-madden-after-ben-fiasco-nfl-has-to-suspend-favre.html

After Ben fiasco, NFL has to suspend Favre
By: Mark Madden
. . . .
What Favre did was against the law, against NFL rules, against New York Jets policy and just plain dumb.

Not sure I agree with this. Ben raped a woman. Brett sent pics of little brett to a woman he knew. I have a tough time equating the two. If Sterger doesn't talk, then the possibility exists that she was okay at the time with the perverse courtship practice.

[sheepshead]

http://www.timesonline.com/sports/sports_details/article/1424/2010/october/10/monday-madden-after-ben-fiasco-nfl-has-to-suspend-favre.html

After Ben fiasco, NFL has to suspend Favre
By: Mark Madden
. . . .
What Favre did was against the law, against NFL rules, against New York Jets policy and just plain dumb.

Not sure I agree with this. Ben raped a woman. Brett sent pics of little brett to a woman he knew. I have a tough time equating the two. If Sterger doesn't talk, then the possibility exists that she was okay at the time with the perverse courtship practice.

Not only wasnt he convicted, he wasnt even charged. Fact check man.

[MadtownPacker]

http://www.timesonline.com/sports/sports_details/article/1424/2010/october/10/monday-madden-after-ben-fiasco-nfl-has-to-suspend-favre.html

After Ben fiasco, NFL has to suspend Favre
By: Mark Madden
. . . .
What Favre did was against the law, against NFL rules, against New York Jets policy and just plain dumb.

Not sure I agree with this. Ben raped a woman. Brett sent pics of little brett to a woman he knew. I have a tough time equating the two. If Sterger doesn't talk, then the possibility exists that she was okay at the time with the perverse courtship practice.

You know what I aint gonna lie, I think that lady is likely a ho. She is marketing that thang to make a name for herself. She has been in Playboy and pretty much has her tits on display at all times. Not hating on her for it in fact I say roll with it if that is what you wanna do. But if she was to follow through with the complaint how will her "legacy" be changed? What fun is it seeing her if all you are gonna think is "that's the chick that filed harassment!". I believe it is even in her best interest to let it go. Then folks might say "thats the chick that let Favre off the hook!". Cant say that doesn't have a better ring to it. Not like she hasnt gotten major attention over this anyways.

[pbmax]

this thread blows.

I think that thread is in the Garbage Can.

[sheepshead]

Did Deanna throw this? (must see)

http://wcco.com/video/?id=84657%40wcco.dayport.com

[gex]

this thread blows.

2ND