Originally posted by imscott72
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
OFFICIAL FAVRE SEXT SCANDAL ROCKS SPORTS WORLD
Collapse
X
-
We know that Bert is more of an Icon than Big Ben but just because he is a great he shouldnt be suspended and treated just like Big Ben? I am sure if he is suspended they will fight it in court because the Vikes are allowed to cheat.Originally posted by Scott CampbellOriginally posted by Tony OdayWow it will take that long...Big Ben's investigation was still ongoing when he was suspended for 6 games at first...Originally posted by Scott CampbellFlorio writes that he doesn't think the NFL could complete an investigation by the end of the season, but that Bert might retire anyway as the easy way out.
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...investigation/
I'm not so sure why it has to take so long. Rothlesberger was a he said she said situation. There's a verifiable audit trail on this one. He either did it, or he didn't.
The distraction taints the game on the field. And Goodell might get tired of questions about why he's protecting Bert.Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.
Comment
-
I can guarentee Brett Favre isn't get suspended, all for reasons unrelated to the situation.
#1 - this is possibly his last year (as it is every yaer, you just don't know when he's going to hang it up)
#2 - the nfl is better with him in it then not, even if we want him to go away. Fact remains he is a national icon.
#3 - favre has done this before when he was younger, it's not as if this is a new revelation. He hasn't always been 100% faithful to his wife, even if he does "love" her. It's always been one of his biggest flaws in his personal life.
#4 - unlike in the Big Ben situation, there are no charges actually up for discussion with Favre. Sterger isn't, and hasn't, been pressing the issue or pushing for a case, the jets haven't, the vikings haven't, favre hasn't countered the news with a case against deadspin - all there is right now is a pending NFL investigation into the allegations that the pics and voicemail are indeed from Brett - so far there is no pending legal case.
#5 - "but big ben was..." was what? In his second law suit about innappropriate actions with college chicks. Yeah, he never got in trouble legally, but charges did get pressed. In the situation with Favre, there are no charges even threatened, and Sterger never released any information about the incident (according to her representatives), meaning whoever the "source", if it's legit, had to have STOLEN the voicemails. (aka, got ahol dof her phone and took everything off it).
#6 - Favre isn't untouchable, but he's as untouchable as a NFL superstar can get. While the NFL clearly wants it's players to be stand up individuals, fact remainst hat affairs are part of the normal human behavior in our present society. The only real issue here is how bad Favre is at picking up women these days. It's as if he thinks he can just say "hey I'm fucking Brett Favre" and get what he wants. He needs to spit some better game than that.
Bottom line - nothing is going to happen to favre. The NFL investigation isn't going to go anywhere unless: Deadspin gives up it's source, which it has no intention of doing, or unless Sterger wants to press an issue, which she has stated several times that she doesn't.
In short, there is nothing to worry about in the Favre camp, outside of another threat from his wife for divorce. It's all personal life related for mr. Favre and that is where he may get burned. I doubt the NFL takes any actions.
Comment
-
Forgot to also add that Big Ben's first situation that arose only got a warning from Mr. Goodell. It was the second time it happened that prompted a suspension. Outside of the fact that no one is even pressing charges against #4, best case scenario is Favre gets a meeting with Goodell where he reasserts the player conduct code, possibly sees a small fine if any fine at all, and is sent along his way.
A new story arises from his time on the vikings, that is when the hammer could get dropped.
In fact, I think deadspin itself even said favre mos tlikely wont get suspended, and they solely did it to stir up contreversy heading into the jets game. a month from now no one will be talking about it anymore.
Comment
-
I think you might be dead wrong on this one. Charges may be coming-Originally posted by packerbacker1234I can guarentee Brett Favre isn't get suspended, all for reasons unrelated to the situation.
#1 - this is possibly his last year (as it is every yaer, you just don't know when he's going to hang it up)
#2 - the nfl is better with him in it then not, even if we want him to go away. Fact remains he is a national icon.
#3 - favre has done this before when he was younger, it's not as if this is a new revelation. He hasn't always been 100% faithful to his wife, even if he does "love" her. It's always been one of his biggest flaws in his personal life.
#4 - unlike in the Big Ben situation, there are no charges actually up for discussion with Favre. Sterger isn't, and hasn't, been pressing the issue or pushing for a case, the jets haven't, the vikings haven't, favre hasn't countered the news with a case against deadspin - all there is right now is a pending NFL investigation into the allegations that the pics and voicemail are indeed from Brett - so far there is no pending legal case.
#5 - "but big ben was..." was what? In his second law suit about innappropriate actions with college chicks. Yeah, he never got in trouble legally, but charges did get pressed. In the situation with Favre, there are no charges even threatened, and Sterger never released any information about the incident (according to her representatives), meaning whoever the "source", if it's legit, had to have STOLEN the voicemails. (aka, got ahol dof her phone and took everything off it).
#6 - Favre isn't untouchable, but he's as untouchable as a NFL superstar can get. While the NFL clearly wants it's players to be stand up individuals, fact remainst hat affairs are part of the normal human behavior in our present society. The only real issue here is how bad Favre is at picking up women these days. It's as if he thinks he can just say "hey I'm fucking Brett Favre" and get what he wants. He needs to spit some better game than that.
Bottom line - nothing is going to happen to favre. The NFL investigation isn't going to go anywhere unless: Deadspin gives up it's source, which it has no intention of doing, or unless Sterger wants to press an issue, which she has stated several times that she doesn't.
In short, there is nothing to worry about in the Favre camp, outside of another threat from his wife for divorce. It's all personal life related for mr. Favre and that is where he may get burned. I doubt the NFL takes any actions.
Deadspin's exposure of Favre's alleged exposure apparently has prompted one of the Jets' former massage therapists to come forward with an account of Favre pursuing two massage therapists -- and eventually sending them "nasty" text messages.
The husband of one of the women took offense, and supposedly dialed the number from which Favre sent the text messages. "I called him on his phone and told him I wanted an apology," the man told A.J. Daulerio of Deadspin. "He acted all arrogant. He refused to apologize."
The couple claims they contacted a lawyer regarding a potential sexual harassment case, but they were told that, because the women are contractors and not employees, they could not pursue the matter. (Maybe they should have talked to a better lawyer; the specific status a person holds in a workplace doesn't provide immunity from the sexual harassment laws. Otherwise, everyone would hire contractors and the business world would be Sterling Cooper Draper Whoremonger all over again.)
The couple also claims that the text messages have been saved, and that they have not yet decided whether to go public.
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/10/08/favre-faces-more-allegations-from-his-new-york-days/Earlier tonight, our friends Adam Schein and Chris Carlin of SNY's Loudmouths asked me whether the NFL will discipline Vikings quarterback Brett Favre in the wake of the new evidence indicating that Favre possibly exposed a former Jets in-house sideline reporter to unwanted advances and/or…
Comment
-
Originally posted by packerbacker1234I can guarentee Brett Favre isn't get suspended, all for reasons unrelated to the situation.
#1 - this is possibly his last year (as it is every yaer, you just don't know when he's going to hang it up)
#2 - the nfl is better with him in it then not, even if we want him to go away. Fact remains he is a national icon.
#3 - favre has done this before when he was younger, it's not as if this is a new revelation. He hasn't always been 100% faithful to his wife, even if he does "love" her. It's always been one of his biggest flaws in his personal life.
#4 - unlike in the Big Ben situation, there are no charges actually up for discussion with Favre. Sterger isn't, and hasn't, been pressing the issue or pushing for a case, the jets haven't, the vikings haven't, favre hasn't countered the news with a case against deadspin - all there is right now is a pending NFL investigation into the allegations that the pics and voicemail are indeed from Brett - so far there is no pending legal case.
#5 - "but big ben was..." was what? In his second law suit about innappropriate actions with college chicks. Yeah, he never got in trouble legally, but charges did get pressed. In the situation with Favre, there are no charges even threatened, and Sterger never released any information about the incident (according to her representatives), meaning whoever the "source", if it's legit, had to have STOLEN the voicemails. (aka, got ahol dof her phone and took everything off it).
#6 - Favre isn't untouchable, but he's as untouchable as a NFL superstar can get. While the NFL clearly wants it's players to be stand up individuals, fact remainst hat affairs are part of the normal human behavior in our present society. The only real issue here is how bad Favre is at picking up women these days. It's as if he thinks he can just say "hey I'm fucking Brett Favre" and get what he wants. He needs to spit some better game than that.
Bottom line - nothing is going to happen to favre. The NFL investigation isn't going to go anywhere unless: Deadspin gives up it's source, which it has no intention of doing, or unless Sterger wants to press an issue, which she has stated several times that she doesn't.
In short, there is nothing to worry about in the Favre camp, outside of another threat from his wife for divorce. It's all personal life related for mr. Favre and that is where he may get burned. I doubt the NFL takes any actions.
All I'm going to say right now is that maybe you need to need to spend some more time pondering the situation, and reading.
Comment
-
Opinion: Please Help Me Believe There’s Anything Other Than Systemic Harassment Taking Place
I don’t feel a need to explain how much I love the Jets, I think that writing daily on this site, for the past six years, is testament enough. If one really loves someone in life, sometimes addressing difficult issues for their betterment, with “tough love”, is the right thing to do. It pains me to so openly point out some serious concerns I have about the Jets organization. But there seems to be a growing perception of systemic misogyny through some recent unfortunate incidents.
I don’t imagine that my words will change the way that professional sports operate, or the way that players conduct themselves, or that all fans who read this will suddenly all agree with my opinion, but to silently allow the issue to continue, in my mind, wouldn’t be right either. Also, let’s be very clear that I’m not saying that I live a perfect life and haven’t learned lessons the hard way, but if we waited for someone to who has lived a wholly virtuous life to address this, then we might be here for a while.
This opening statement is of course pre-text to the presently alleged event of former Jet QB Brett Favre sexting former Jets Game Day Host Jenn Sterger reported on Deadspin and now the subsequent harassment of massage therapists coming forward. Over the past months since this story was first hinted at by Deadspin, I’ve had this story confirmed to me by multiple independent sources who knew about this, saw the pictures, etc. But beyond just Favre’s inappropriate actions, I’m also talking about the Ines Sainz incident, and yes … even the Gate D situation of a few years back.
Why bring up old wounds? Because they are just that, wounds. Sexual harassment is no trivial thing, and for any to use excuses like, ‘This happened years ago,’ or, ‘She wasn’t even an employee,’ or, ‘Favre isn’t even here anymore’ are arguments in poor taste.
“We view these as isolated incidents,” said Bruce Speight, Jets spokesman, by phone on Friday. “And we took a proactive approach when they were brought to our attention.”
It’s a fair statement if the only concern is to address harassment from a reactionary standpoint. Pro-actively they need to set forth establishing new guidelines to prevent such situations in the future, and as far as I can tell, there is no such plan in place for the Jets.
The way that the Jets are addressing the situation, it would appear to me that Jets can only act on wrongdoing that they know about after the fact, by the mounting evidence, they are terrible at preventing it.
Finding blame in sexual harassment can be a tricky thing, which is why forward thinking organizations have zero or near-zero tolerance policies when it comes to harassment of any kind. I’ve requested a copy of the Jets harassment policy, and will post what I find out, when I know more.
At the business where I work, all parties (harasser, harassed, witness), no matter their employment status, in the case of any sexual harassment can be culpable if they don’t immediately bring up the incident. More often than not, it should be the witness for whom is the easiest to act. Of course, some parties might be less culpable than others (specifically the harassed, for obvious reasons), but the point that harassment, or even perceived harassment should be immediately addressed by all involved directly or indirectly is tantamount to making the system work and to prevent hostile environments, and future incidents.
Let’s look at the scenarios.
Gate D. The sporting facility was rented/owned respectively by the Jets & New Jersey Sports Exposition Authority organizations. In the case of Gate D, NJSEA employees ran the facility and were in charge of security. Despite NJSEA’s responsibility, incidents have happened frequently as a longstanding tradition. Jets fans acted as the harasser, harassed and witness. While it would be nice for Jets fans to police themselves, the NJSEA was the truer police of the situation; this policing is part of their contractual obligation. Despite the frequency of the events, as well as easily verifiable evidence by simply watching Gate D during the games, neither the NJSEA nor the Jets took proactive steps to curb the abhorrent behavior. Failure to act ultimately made both organizations appear to be responsible. If there is any good news out of this, it’s that in the new stadium security is directly controlled by the team, so there should be no excuses for these type of issues.
Inez Sainz. In the case of Sainz, inappropriate statements of a sexual and derogatory manner were being made in the locker room for an indeterminate duration. It wasn’t until a reporter (witness) intervened to the harassed (Sainz) as a Jets PR staffer (witness, but seemingly with more authority in the situation than the reporter) looked on. The reporter’s intervention was then rebuked by Kris Jenkins. Action on the matter by the Jets PR staffer was not immediate, and thus the team appears to be responsible both by not being proactive to the incident. While the team did immediately contact Joanne Gerstner at the American Women in Sports Media, it was again reactionary in nature.
Jenn Sterger. In the case of Sterger, the original story was broken by Deadspin on 8/6/10. We’re led to believe by Deadspin that she was not only approached in an inappropriate manner, but that she unequivocally declined, and also that Favre had the help of a fellow Jets employee, Jets Media Relations Manager Jared Winley in approaching her multiple times in order to initiate some sort of relationship that Sterger did not want. Action on the matter wasn’t immediate, ultimately making the organization appear to be not only negligent in duty, but potentially complicit in the sexual harassment of Sterger.
Massage Therapists. In the case of Favre and the massage therapists, the original story was broken by Deadspin and the Post on 8/8/10. The women received “nasty” messages from Favre, who allegedly would not apologize to one of the therapists’ husband, and who were told by a lawyer that since they were contractors, their claims had no merit. Whoever that lawyer was, clearly his degree isn’t worth the paper it’s printed on, something which Florio and I actually seem to agree on. This matter is still working itself out, but sounds like another cautionary tale of poor pro-activity and maybe even worse reactivity. I can only conclude that the lawyer in question was an in-house counsel for the Jets (translation: hack) who had the team’s, not the therapists, best interests at heart.
On Thursday, Deadspin Editor-in-Chief AJ Daulerio wrote about this, saying the following.
The Jets have issued a statement through Sunshine PR, saying that "this is the first they’ve heard of this situation." The team also made it known that Sterger was a contractor hired to work on game days only, and that she didn’t work directly for the Jets
Daulerio mentions Sunshine, Sachs & Associates, whom I called today to better understand the quote to the Deadspin Editor. Upon my reading of the part about her being a contractor, caused me serious concern. The specific status (employee, contractor) holds in a workplace doesn’t provide immunity from harassment laws, and I was hoping that wasn’t what the Jets thought, which is why I pressed the matter and was referred by the team to Sunshine, Sachs & Associates.
Mr. Jesse Derris said that Daulerio repeatedly referred to Sterger as an “employee” and Sunshine told Daulerio that they wanted to make clear her status as a contractor. “[Sunshine, Sachs & Associates was] correcting an anticipated error in the story [by Deadspin], nothing more.”
So while it’s clear she was not an employee, it doesn’t acquit the Jets organization of workplace harassment, it just adjusted any potential foul-ups about her 1099 status.
In any organization, sexual harassment can happen to employees, vendors, contractors, guests … it doesn’t matter who writes their paycheck, unwelcome sexual advances in the workplace are, just that, unwelcome and in the workplace. And just because something wrong happened in the past doesn’t sanctify it in the present, whether that player is still on the team or no longer there. Harassment is harassment, plain & simple.
Ms. Sterger might not have reported what Favre did at the time, but AJ Daulerio at Deadspin seems eager to fill in the gaps.
Daulerio said Sterger did not provide the photos and voicemails and declined comment for his post. "She doesn’t want to be seen as Rachel Uchitel," Daulerio said of Sterger, referring to one of Tiger Woods’ mistresses, "even though she didn’t do anything wrong. It would be interesting to get her take on it."
"There is a pattern of recklessness with athletes that seems alarming," Daulerio said. "He’s a high-profile, public person. For him to engage in this kind of behavior – we think that is newsworthy."
Sadly, as far as we know, Sterger didn’t in fact report the incident at the time to the team (which according to the Jets, we can imply that she didn’t). Unless she breaks her silence, it only leaves doubt about whether the allegations were actual harassment or something else.
My meaning? Her role in the matter will always (rightly or wrongly) be suspect because of her subsequent actions. Personally, I believe her to be a legitimate victim, which makes the whole thing even sadder because she was subjected to something she shouldn’t have been, and she is apparently ok with it, and that as part of becoming a Jets contractor, sexual harassment wasn’t properly addressed. Sterger’s inaction, and then subsequent sharing of this correspondence with others (a third party who then shared them with AJ) have left her status and credibility in the matter suspect.
This second set of massage therapists is tragic too, since they received terrible legal counsel from a questionable source.
When a specific type of event happens once, it is “isolated.” When it happens a second time, it is an unusual recurrence. However, the more it happens, the less one can live with the cognitive dissonance and try and ignore the problem. It has gone from an isolated event to something else that might be systemic. No matter what the team might say, there is a pattern here.
Since this Sterger story broke yesterday, TheJetsBlog has been approached by a former Gameday Ops (i.e. JetsFest) intern who said that a few years ago, interns were mandated to wear sparkly, tight-fitting official Reebok materials that left little to the imagination. When female interns pushed back on concerns of decency, they were rebuffed by their boss in the Jets organization (someone who has since left the team) and told it was NFL sanctioned clothing, end of story. How tight the shirt was, what the outfit specifically was is irrelevant. The interns (yet another status in the workplace who should be afforded equal protection) voiced their concerns, and they were not addressed.
I’m not foolish enough to think that this is a Jets only problem; other players in the league have let us know a little about such bad behavior.
Just this past May, Kansas City WR Dwayne Bowe was caught bragging about his teammates ‘importing’ women . Even NFL Golden Boy Peyton Manning was flagged for allegedly engaging in “horseplay” back in college, and then later in his alleged barging in on a former Colts cheerleader in her hotel room. While we’re a long way from the days of former Patriot Zeke Mowatt’s abhorrent acts to Lisa Olson, it’s clear that there’s still room for betterment within the league. It’s clear that the Jets aren’t alone on this, but it’s certainly true that they are getting more than their fair share of ink around these incidents.
Still, even if the Jets are getting more than their fair share, it’s only because these stories are coming to light with greater frequency. Greater numbers of people are willing to be witnesses to actions that are inappropriate. If two people are driving over the speed limit on the highway, and one gets caught by a cop and the other doesn’t, it doesn’t make the person who didn’t get caught right… it just means they didn’t get caught by the cop.
Sunshine, Sachs PR did claim that the Jets didn’t know about this matter with Sterger until very recently; meaning they did not know about it two months ago when this story first was hinted at on Deadspin.
On that count, I have no facts so this is totally my opinion, but that is something that I personally find very hard to believe. The talk of these pictures was all over major market sports radio for days after Deadspin hinted at this… this can’t be the first the team is hearing about this can it? Are they that naive to the fact that they were tangentially the butt of the jokes about Favre’s orange clogs or whatever Internet-wide for the past few months?
And what about Goodell and the league office? Not one of them got wind of this months ago when it hit Deadspin and informed the team? So a league which is overly sensitive to how players talk in a locker room in moments when they are most vulnerable to speaking candidly about the league officiating are suddenly ignorant when it comes to players talking or acting towards women in a much more derogatory manor?
The political phrase “willfully ignorant” comes to mind.
I don’t know specifically what I’m asking for to change. I don’t know that it ever will in professional sports, but I do know that I’m seeing something that is increasingly hard for me to ignore as a fan. I’ve called out the organization for not acting immediately, but also have to practice on the matter which I’m calling them to action.
Like any witness to harassment, it’s my job to take that toughest step forward, the very first one, and address the situation with you, the fans. It’s my job to tell the truth about what I saw, but beyond that, it’s up to authorities to do right and restore the situation by taking whatever justice is merited.
I’ve done my part … now it’s up to the Jets and the NFL to do theirs.
Comment
-
So sometime in 1995 the wife of the Quarterback's coach told her not to leave Favre or he would kill himself.Originally posted by vince
[size=18][b]At the time, the couple shared a 6-year-old daughter and a home in Green Bay.
"Most people assumed I was jealous and simply wanted him to stop going out. But I knew something was dreadfully wrong," Deanna wrote in her book, "Don't Bet Against Me! Beating the Odds Against Breast Cancer and in Life."
"One night, I walked into the room and heard Brett talking on the phone to a woman I had discovered he'd been calling," she wrote.
" 'That's it!' I told him. 'I don't deserve to be treated like this. You asked me to move up here to Green Bay, and now you're calling these girls -- well, you're on your own now. I'm not living this way. All this stuff is over for me.' "
Deanna, who was diagnosed with cancer in 2004, said Favre -- who's being probed by the NFL for inappropriate behavior with a sideline reporter -- "heard the finality in my voice and realized I was done."
"The next day, he sent me flowers and begged me not to go," Deanna wrote.
What changed her mind was speaking with the wife of the Packers' quarterback coach, who told her, "Don't leave, or Brett will end up killing himself."
Deanna stayed, but Favre later left for Mississippi in the off-season, with his addiction spiraling out of control. In May 1996, with Deanna back by his side, he revealed his dependency on Vicodin and went into rehab.
His QB coach at the time was Steve Mariucci (92 to 95). Its good to know Deanna was getting solid, unfiltered advice from a woman whose livelihood depended on Farvre preforming well as QB of the Packers.
And that advice, if accurately recalled by Deanna, is among the dumbest advice I have ever heard.Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Comment
-
You are the biggest BF apologist ever!!!Originally posted by packerbacker1234I can guarentee Brett Favre isn't get suspended, all for reasons unrelated to the situation.
#1 - this is possibly his last year (as it is every yaer, you just don't know when he's going to hang it up)
#2 - the nfl is better with him in it then not, even if we want him to go away. Fact remains he is a national icon.
#3 - favre has done this before when he was younger, it's not as if this is a new revelation. He hasn't always been 100% faithful to his wife, even if he does "love" her. It's always been one of his biggest flaws in his personal life.
#4 - unlike in the Big Ben situation, there are no charges actually up for discussion with Favre. Sterger isn't, and hasn't, been pressing the issue or pushing for a case, the jets haven't, the vikings haven't, favre hasn't countered the news with a case against deadspin - all there is right now is a pending NFL investigation into the allegations that the pics and voicemail are indeed from Brett - so far there is no pending legal case.
#5 - "but big ben was..." was what? In his second law suit about innappropriate actions with college chicks. Yeah, he never got in trouble legally, but charges did get pressed. In the situation with Favre, there are no charges even threatened, and Sterger never released any information about the incident (according to her representatives), meaning whoever the "source", if it's legit, had to have STOLEN the voicemails. (aka, got ahol dof her phone and took everything off it).
#6 - Favre isn't untouchable, but he's as untouchable as a NFL superstar can get. While the NFL clearly wants it's players to be stand up individuals, fact remainst hat affairs are part of the normal human behavior in our present society. The only real issue here is how bad Favre is at picking up women these days. It's as if he thinks he can just say "hey I'm fucking Brett Favre" and get what he wants. He needs to spit some better game than that.
Bottom line - nothing is going to happen to favre. The NFL investigation isn't going to go anywhere unless: Deadspin gives up it's source, which it has no intention of doing, or unless Sterger wants to press an issue, which she has stated several times that she doesn't.
In short, there is nothing to worry about in the Favre camp, outside of another threat from his wife for divorce. It's all personal life related for mr. Favre and that is where he may get burned. I doubt the NFL takes any actions.
Reason #1 is the biggest piece of crap I have heard in a long time. So if this came out in 2008 you don't suspend Favre who had retired for the 2nd time officially already because its his last year. And here we are in 2010 and BF is still playing.
#2: The NFL is better with Favre on the field. His off-field antics for the last 5 years has not been good.
#3: When Favre was running around in the 90s it sure didn't blow up like this. I had never seen BF's cock until this week.
#4: Absolutely true at this moment.
#5: Absolutely true. But now we have more women coming out of the woodwork. Who knows what might be filed.
#6: No one is above the game and Goodell has been very active in telling players that the rules are a changing about off-filed behavior.But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.
-Tim Harmston
Comment
-
In an effort to promote healing and unity at PackerRats and in Packer nation, I want to extend the following offer to Woody. If he's brave enough to post in this thread, I will not reply to him. Not a peep. He's free to say whatever he likes here without any fear of retaliation from me. I'd like to promote contributions from all sides of this discussion, and hope this small token would help unite rather than divide.
I give you all on my word on this.
Comment
-
the "My Brett, our Favre II" voiceover from Deanna should be epic.
I: "Legends write their own stories..."
II: "Legends write their own text messages... masseuses file their own lawsuits""Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
Comment

Comment