OFFICIAL FAVRE SEXT SCANDAL ROCKS SPORTS WORLD

[pbmax]

Actually Woodbuck, the great majority of the video is audio only. A copy of two voice mails with no material that could be deemed not safe for work. If you stop after 2 minutes or so (the website gives the exact time) you can skip the photography altogether.

[mraynrand]

I challenge both Scott Campbell and Tarlam! to change or expose themselves

Isn't this exactly what started all the troubles?

[Freak Out]

This is why Packerrats is the best fan site on the web.

[Tarlam!]

more personal attacks

when will something be done about this?

See Woody, your fan club lost another member.

[woodbuck27]

I challenge both Scott Campbell and Tarlam! to change or expose themselves

Isn't this exactly what started all the troubles?

With all respect.

No mraynrand. I'm struggling for one ideal here man.

PEACE for all members of this forum.

Packerats as a Packer fan site home.

That home being for ALL members ... OURS. OUR HOME!

Our home existing in terms entirely based in common respect,dignity and a duty for all members at Packerrats to use common sense in not harming any member that isn't posting in accordance with those that broadcast hate and obsessively post in that manner.

[sheepshead]

I challenge both Scott Campbell and Tarlam! to change or expose themselves

Isn't this exactly what started all the troubles?

With all respect.

No mraynrand. I'm struggling for one ideal here man.

PEACE for all members of this forum.

Packerats as a Packer fan site home.

That home being for ALL members ... OURS. OUR HOME!

Our home existing in terms entirely based in common respect,dignity and a duty for all members at Packerrats to use common sense in not harming any member that isn't posting in accordance with those that broadcast hate and obsessively post in that manner.

can you take a picture of your house and post it please?

[Cheesehead Craig]

The natives here in MN are very restless.

Forums scream that Favre should be benched.

They point to that T-Jack had better numbers than Favre and was benched for it.

Yes, there are calls for T-Jack. And they are not few in number.

[sheepshead]

The natives here in MN are very restless.

Forums scream that Favre should be benched.

They point to that T-Jack had better numbers than Favre and was benched for it.

Yes, there are calls for T-Jack. And they are not few in number.

Favre sure looked pedestrian last night that's for sure.

Florio just said the same thing...

[woodbuck27]

Actually Woodbuck, the great majority of the video is audio only. A copy of two voice mails with no material that could be deemed not safe for work. If you stop after 2 minutes or so (the website gives the exact time) you can skip the photography altogether.

OK Thank You pbmax. I appreciate that information.

pbmax:

Do you 100% find that that man's voice in that source of information or purported evidence. That on that video, that the man is 'in fact' Brett Favre. That your 100% positive that's Brett Favre speaking on that video?

I'm sorry Packerrats but I have to leave here for the day. Places to go. Things to do. People to see.

Have a wonderful day.

[HowardRoark]

Woodbuck, how can you accurately analyze the situation when you won't even look at the evidence? You are coming from a less knowledgeable position then probably every person here, yet you act 100% sure he is innocent?

Regarding judging, as far as I can see you judge SC and Tarlam nearly every chance you get. You also judge many on this forum with your holier than thou attitude lecturing to us all how horrible we are for believing Favre is guilty. Do you not find some of your statements a bit hypocritical??

"how can you accurately analyze the situation when you won't even look at the evidence?" Bossman641

I will never stoop so low as to watch some video of a man naked below the waist and jerking his slimy and acting like some under sexed slimeball with a woman that has zero interest in him.

Would viewing that video ensure that I would join the rest of the posters at Packerrats, judging Favre based on mere allegations of some tape that was attained without consent, and shows a man that has a voice similiar to Favre's and other body parts that many say just cannot be Favre's?

The answer is NO! Based on what I'm reading. Seeing that video would be a moot effort. Pointless and again a violation of my self respect and choice of free will.

You judge Favre. You join the rest of the railbirds Bossman641. Don't exercise Free Will. Don't act as your own man and take what I believe is the correct or higher road. Favre should not be judged publicly and certainly not at Packerrats. We should be above that as a small society.

You belong where your comfortable and feel right in your integrity. Right? You belong where your FREE WILL lands you. On the opposite side of a fence from me. That fence is called pre judgement. Your side YES! Favre's guilty.

My sde says:

I refuse to judge him. To do so would, 'in fact' make me 'a hypocrit', as I'm imagining many here are in their lack of decent sense, not to judge as that's ethically wrong. Hypocritically wrong and out of place, given. ' The fact' of your, or anyone else's humanity.

That's not my place. Are you perfect Bossman641? Anyone else here at Packerrats perfect? I'm certainly NOT perfect. The haters here will be very quick to inform you of wooodbuck27 and their assessment of me and perfect.

Watch or pay close attention how they go about that. Tyhey believe they have skills. Worse they believe that their correct and justified.They'll inform the membership of my frequent attacks on so many posters.

In fact any perceived attacks are most likely against them and their insider admirers and them not so much.

The clique at Packerreats. It certainly exists. They perceive they have certain and special powers. They are disallutioned.

Packerrats and Bossman641:

If your perfect, anyone? If that's the case then you may certainly justify to me your exceptional Goflike standards as and therefore be above most human beings and an eligible candidate to judge Favre based on your ideal set of morals and ethical behaviours. That only as your appointed to investigate, find guilty and punish Favre in light of his guilt.

I'm not prefecrt. I have not been perfect. I have error'd as a human being. I certainly may not be as solid in character as you are Bossman641? In any case, as I'm a mere human being I'm not qualified to judge Favre and not even eligible. I'm merely a football fan and noone has appointed me as judge of Favre RE: Deadspin published evidence or allegations of Favre's immoral or unethical behaviour.

Is that clear?


" You are coming from a less knowledgeable position then probably every person here, yet you act 100% sure he is innocent?" Bossman641

I'm not sure of either his guilt nor of his innoscence Bossman641.

My position is clearly stated. I don't as yet know. I act of my free will and choose the higher road. I refuse to lower my standards to anyone's that has judged Favre based on material, that many fans say does not fix Favre as the man in that Deadspin released video.

Deadspin....that is a certain play on words hahaaha... as in that spin by Deadspin is ' dead in the water BS' ...

...and as a result, slanderous to Brett Favre. Everey man or woman that jumps on the Favre is guilty, and positively, that man in that video is jumping the gun...persecuting Favre prematurely and a a result wrongly.

Is that clear to you now Bossman641?

A public judgement of Favre is hardly fair in terms related to the known evidence. A video and text messages that have to be carefully examined by people properly appointed to investigate all evidence. That's not you or I or anyone else at Packerrats. Is my position clear now? I cannot make my position more clear Bossman641

" Regarding judging, as far as I can see you judge SC and Tarlam nearly every chance you get. You also judge many on this forum with your holier than thou attitude lecturing to us all how horrible we are for believing Favre is guilty. Do you not find some of your statements a bit hypocritical?? " Bossman641

I cannot judge Scott Campbell nor Tarlam! as I'm again not eligible. I can knowing them on boards /foums and seeing their style of behaviour and posts and their treatment of members here especially Scott Campbell's derisive and sarcastic offensive ways and manners poitively point out that they are haters. Read their posts. It's too easy to determine that fact in their personalities and agendas.

That cannot only be obvious to me. Others here cannot be totally blinded by their posts that clearly express their passions of hate. They both hate very well as more and more I see their power snare others at Packerrats as they join the cheer to persecute Favre. That is only one aspect of their power to hate.

That is their position and so be it. These two posters never get inside of me. I've observed their ways for five years. I've observed others here that act similiar or just like them in a sort of mutual admiration society or private club. So be it.

I don't have to, nor will I ever join their club. They are exactly what I don't ever desire to be, need to be and would lose my self-respect and moral and ethical integrity if I was to become like them. They are clearly driven by obsessions of hate. They are as a result dangerous to my Green Bay Packer fan forum or my Packer home on the internet...Packerrats. Our home ...all packerrats sense of what home should and must be maintaied to be. A place that is non-threatening and non evasive RE: common decency and respect for ALL of the membership. It's OK to disagre as long as they have their power and way. Try criticizing either of them and feel thir wrath and resentment.

Anyone at Packerrats I challenge you to go there.

I know that by making this statement I challenge both Scott Campbell and Tarlam! to change or expose themselves as just what they are, in terms related to past observations. I believe that they will threrefore change and I as a result protect Packerrats.

This issue I have is founded onn just that.It's not at all about me and my problems with either of them .I can handle Scott Campbell and Tarlam! easily. I've had to prove this in the past to myself or I would have gone the way of some past members that were not mas strong and left the Packer forum because of their discomfort or other personal pain because they felt oppressed and unsuported by the general membership that just sits and watch's 'thew show' without intervening and calling out these haters 'to just STOP'. To just clean up and stop their obsessions to ridicule and otherwise demean members of the forum that they choose to disrespect.

If you knew me and my background you would become more understanding of my necessary position.

I believe that the Scott Campbell's and the Tarlam!'s are as they are from their heritage and upbringing that I'm sure they are as proud of as I am mine, Bossman641. Unfortunately my ways and theirs are polar opposites and thus we end up on opposite sides, in terms of hard issues.

Are we so different inn terms of the fact of a cultural difference? Your from the USA. I'm a Canadian from the Maitimes of Eastern Canada.

Is our differences a factor that my father fought against haters and fashists and the perils of Nazi hatred and all innoscent people in that society that wern't of the status quo? Is it maybe because I live the best I cannas a Christian man? Is it a factor of maybe a difference in our educations? Maybe it has to do withjust a personality difference. An emotional balance difference? etc.

No hate is unacceptable as it's an offensive emotion that can only inspire a seed to a web of destruction and domination of their way or the highway and their way is absolutey wrong and unacceptable in OUR Packer forum. Not their Packer forum. Not ever just their agenda's based in their hatred and thus their sickness.

There you go Bossman641. My side of why I oppose the liikes of Scott Campbell and Tarlam!as they've been inmy most sincere and TRTHFUL observations over five years posting on the same Green Bay Packer forums as them.

I mean not to offend .ONly ask for the haters to intervene uponthemselves. STOP Hating. Stop being doninantly oppressive to anyone who ever desires to enjoy Packerats.

The above is TRUTH. My TRUTH.


My name is Edwin Wood woodbuck27

How can you tupe this much?

[swede]

My name is Edwin Wood

MY name is Edwin Wood.

[channtheman]

Serious question. Does anyone here actually read Woodbuck's book length posts? Or do you scroll past them and continually be amazed by the length?

[mraynrand]

.........................

How can you tupe this much?

Once you start tuping, it's hard to stop:

[get louder at lambeau]

Serious question. Does anyone here actually read Woodbuck's book length posts? Or do you scroll past them and continually be amazed by the length?

I scroll.

[mraynrand]

Serious question. Does anyone here actually read Woodbuck's book length posts? Or do you scroll past them and continually be amazed by the length?

I just try to find a funny snippet, that I can take out of context. Then Woody answers it SERIOUSLY! That's Hi-larious! Woody is a Packerrats icon...