Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

OFFICIAL FAVRE SEXT SCANDAL ROCKS SPORTS WORLD

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts



  • Jenn Sterger could take money from Brett Favre to keep quiet, attorney Gloria Allred says

    BY Michael O'Keeffe
    DAILY NEWS SPORTS WRITER


    The sexy TV personality who allegedly received X-rated crotch shots from Brett Favre is under no obligation to talk to NFL investigators - and, according to attorney Gloria Allred, she could even agree to a deal with the legendary quarterback to keep her mouth shut.

    Attorneys who believe their clients have legitimate harassment complaints can negotiate settlements that include confidentiality clauses, Allred told the Daily News Monday.

    "Parties often agree to confidential settlements rather than have one party pursue litigation," said Allred, who represented Tiger Woods' mistresses Rachel Uchitel, who is reported to have received a settlement from Woods prior to canceling a news conference, and porn actress Joslyn James. "If there's no legal merit to the claim, that's a different situation."

    Sterger has not ruled out cooperating with the NFL's probe but she has also not yet agreed to talk to the league's investigators, according to a source familiar with the NFL inquiry. Sterger's manager, Phil Reese, declined comment Monday when asked if she has retained counsel.

    "We're looking at all our options right now and our only concern is what's in Jenn's best interest," Reese said in an email to the News.

    Unlike prosecutors, NFL investigators cannot issue subpoenas requiring Sterger to talk about the photos and voicemails Favre allegedly sent in a clumsy attempt to woo Sterger, who is now a host of "The Daily Line" on Versus.

    "She has no legal duty to speak to the NFL," Allred said. "The only way you can compel somebody to answer questions is with a subpoena."

    A.J. Daulerio, the Deadspin editor who posted on his website what he says are pictures of Favre's private parts last week, says he's heard from Sterger's friends that the former Jets game-day hostess has been getting pressure to not speak to the NFL gumshoes.

    "She doesn't want to be known as the person who ruined the public perception of this guy," said Daulerio, who has not spoken directly with Sterger.

    Deadspin posted three pictures of private parts it says the Minnesota Vikings quarterback sent to Sterger in 2008, when Favre was with the Jets and Sterger was the game-day hostess.

    Daulerio also posted voicemails he says that Favre, a 41-year-old grandfather, left on Sterger's phone in a attempt to hook up with the 26-year-old model, actress and TV host.

    Two other women - massage therapists who also worked for the Jets in 2008 - have said Favre sent them unwelcome texts, phone calls and emails.

    Daulerio said Sterger did not supply the photos and voicemails. The website purchased them from a third party he refused to identify.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by channtheman
      Or do you scroll past them and continually be amazed by the length?
      I think that's whart that gal working for the Jets did.
      After lunch the players lounged about the hotel patio watching the surf fling white plumes high against the darkening sky. Clouds were piling up in the west… Vince Lombardi frowned.

      Comment


      • Maybe I'm just slow here (and I have scrolled past most of this thread) but it just occured to me that Deanna knows the truth.

        Two seconds for her to have a peek at the photos and give it a yay or nay. So I'd guess his fate is determined one way or the other where she's concerned.

        Of course, we're all assuming she's concerned...
        --
        Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Guiness
          Maybe I'm just slow here (and I have scrolled past most of this thread) but it just occured to me that Deanna knows the truth.

          Two seconds for her to have a peek at the photos and give it a yay or nay. So I'd guess his fate is determined one way or the other where she's concerned.

          Of course, we're all assuming she's concerned...
          I think it's a Bill & Hillary dealy.
          After lunch the players lounged about the hotel patio watching the surf fling white plumes high against the darkening sky. Clouds were piling up in the west… Vince Lombardi frowned.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by HowardRoark
            Originally posted by Guiness
            Of course, we're all assuming she's concerned...
            I think it's a Bill & Hillary dealy.
            My point exactly.
            --
            Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

            Comment


            • Originally posted by woodbuck27
              I cannot judge Scott Campbell nor Tarlam! as I'm again not eligible.
              Well, in this post alone you pass judgement on quite a few occasions,

              Comment


              • Originally posted by woodbuck27
                They both hate very well as more and more I see their power snare others at Packerrats as they join the cheer to persecute Favre.
                I'm a Packer fan. I'm entitled to hate Brett Favre, just as much as you are entitled to have a man crush on him. You insist only you way or the highway. That's unacceptable in a democracy and, unless you own the Packer Rats, unacceptable here.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by woodbuck27
                  These two posters never get inside of me.
                  Why would I want to? You sick old man. Seriously though, I saw this in another posters reply. Only then did I scan your latest Phd thesis to put it into context. I ignored the rest of your dribble.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by woodbuck27
                    I don't have to, nor will I ever join their club. They are exactly what I don't ever desire to be, need to be and would lose my self-respect and moral and ethical integrity if I was to become like them.
                    I don't speak for SC, he doesn't for me. He has stuck to his word and left your completely alone on this thread. He has demonstrated his ability to keep his word. You, on the other hand, are still in it, despite saying you were out. Integrity. You don't come close to demonstrating it.I think you're confusing integrity with hypocracy

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by woodbuck27
                      They are clearly driven by obsessions of hate. They are as a result dangerous to my Green Bay Packer fan forum or my Packer home on the internet...Packerrats. Our home ...all packerrats sense of what home should and must be maintaied to be.
                      Funny, but you seem to be the only one that believes this. Was there a vote for poster spokesperson and you won? When was that? I must have been drafting my wreck PR manifesto at the time.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by woodbuck27
                        Try criticizing either of them and feel thir wrath and resentment.
                        I get critisism all the time from other posters, I have observed SC cop it as well. As long as personal attacks are void of such critisism I am "not guilty as charged"

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by woodbuck27
                          I know that by making this statement I challenge both Scott Campbell and Tarlam! to change or expose themselves as just what they are, in terms related to past observations. I believe that they will threrefore change and I as a result protect Packerrats.
                          This is jibberish. What you see is what you get. I don't have an urge to change, the owner hasn't issued me with a warning and when I've been outta line, posters have pointed it out and I usually apologize. As to exposing myself - what the hell are you even talking about?

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Guiness
                            Maybe I'm just slow here (and I have scrolled past most of this thread) but it just occured to me that Deanna knows the truth.

                            Two seconds for her to have a peek at the photos and give it a yay or nay. So I'd guess his fate is determined one way or the other where she's concerned.

                            Of course, we're all assuming she's concerned...
                            He's be a moron to text her a photo of his private parts. Of course, he'd be a moron to send her voice mails also. It's possible that he is an old pervert that made the calls, but the nasty photo he sent wasn't him. Would be interesting to know, but I bet she gets hush money.
                            "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by woodbuck27
                              To just clean up and stop their obsessions to ridicule and otherwise demean members of the forum that they choose to disrespect.
                              The only person I was ever hostile against was Sheepshead. I still am and probably always will be. Unless personally attacked, or force fed religeon on a fooball site, I'm cool. No, I lie. mmmk and I had words recently, but I think that's a Danish/German deal.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by woodbuck27
                                Unfortunately my ways and theirs are polar opposites and thus we end up on opposite sides, in terms of hard issues.
                                I don't care if we are polar opposites on anything. My problem is with you. I am appalled at your total disregard for the English language, grammar punctuation, incessant use of CAPS and insisting on addressing posters by name at the end or beginning of each non-sentence. I have no problems with your typos, we all make those.

                                I take issue with your "I'm morally superior to you" approach and your compulsion to impersonate John the Baptist proclaing THE TRUTH IS, speaking on behalf of all Packer Fans on this, our Packer home.

                                I and, it would seem many others, take issue with the abnormal length of your posts

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X