It's the Matt Flynn show!

[Fritz]

I dunno about that lack of arm strength. I watched him in pre-game warmups last week, and he was zipping that damn ball forty yards.

[denverYooper]

Flynn has faced improbable odds before!

[sharpe1027]

Flynn has faced improbable odds before!

Greetings program.

[The Weasel]

I like that Flynn gets the ball out of his hand quicker than Rodgers. Not as much zip, but he doesn't look like he's overthinking things.

You're right, just overthrowing.

[SlimPickens]

Flingin Flynn

[mraynrand]

Flynn has faced improbable odds before!

That looks like Manning in the COLTS alternative uni. Ghey all the way...

[CaptainKickass]

.

Remember what happened to the last QB the Pack had who was nicknamed "Magic/Majik"? We don't need to see a repeat of that.

I keep saying "He's in like....well...himself"

But that's really only mildly funny once.

Hopefully - we will see "The Flynn Effect" which as near as I can tell describes a 20 point increase in IQ.

Let's hope the whole team from admin to players has a resulting 20 point IQ increase as a result of "The Flynn Effect"

From Here:http://www.molwick.com/en/iq-study/0...ect.html#texto

2. Flynn effect and other statistical studies

In any case, the Flynn effect shows and increase in intelligent quotients in different countries. The results of the Flynn effect are accepted.
The problem is with the reasons, causes and interpretation of the facts presented by the Flynn effect.

2.e) Flynn effect and complex econometric models

In my opinion, it is not surprising that, if we are already working with strongly correlated variables and we add a certain feedback, high statistical results can be reached.
On the other hand, this article tries to explain the observed Flynn effect or gain in IQ throughout different generations, specifically, the 20 point increase that occurred between 1952 and 1982 in some countries.

[Patler]

Rodgers hangs on to the ball too long sometimes, looking for a play.

That has been made much too much of.

[denverYooper]

That has been made much too much of.

Ya. I was just digging for a reason to be positive about Flynn.

[bobblehead]

That has been made much too much of.

I disagree. Its his only fault from what I can tell is that he holds the ball too long at times. I won't speculate why, looking for a play, game is still a bit fast for his innate vision (for lack of a better term), is deathly afraid of interceptions after studying under favre. Whatever, the man does hold the ball sometimes when I'm screaming "throw it into the stands".....now sometimes I scream that right before he makes a big play admittedly.

[Kiwon]

Flynn against the Pats. That's a heck of the way to make your first NFL start.

Oh, well, there is always hoping for miracles.

[Pugger]

I disagree. Its his only fault from what I can tell is that he holds the ball too long at times. I won't speculate why, looking for a play, game is still a bit fast for his innate vision (for lack of a better term), is deathly afraid of interceptions after studying under favre. Whatever, the man does hold the ball sometimes when I'm screaming "throw it into the stands".....now sometimes I scream that right before he makes a big play admittedly.

If this is Rodgers' biggest fault I think most of us can live with that. At least he doesn't turn the ball over as much as his predecessor did.

[Tarlam!]

If this is Rodgers' biggest fault I think most of us can live with that. At least he doesn't turn the ball over as much as his predecessor did.

I agree, but also disagree. He's better this year by far, but he still infuriates me when he cops a sack for taking too long. I hate seeing it, and it's outright career-threatening; I don't think most of us can live with that. But he is far better at T/Os, which I'm sure all fans are delighted about.

He and M3 need to agree on an inner clock count to get rid of the ball and stick to it regardless. But M3 needs to call a more strategic game, IMO.

[Patler]

Rodgers hangs on to the ball too long sometimes, looking for a play.

That has been made much too much of.

I disagree. Its his only fault from what I can tell is that he holds the ball too long at times. I won't speculate why, looking for a play, game is still a bit fast for his innate vision (for lack of a better term), is deathly afraid of interceptions after studying under favre. Whatever, the man does hold the ball sometimes when I'm screaming "throw it into the stands".....now sometimes I scream that right before he makes a big play admittedly.

I agree, but also disagree. He's better this year by far, but he still infuriates me when he cops a sack for taking too long. I hate seeing it, and it's outright career-threatening; I don't think most of us can live with that. But he is far better at T/Os, which I'm sure all fans are delighted about.

He and M3 need to agree on an inner clock count to get rid of the ball and stick to it regardless. But M3 needs to call a more strategic game, IMO.

I agree that he does hold the ball "too long" sometimes, I just don't think it is that big of a problem that he does. Sometimes it results in him completing a late pass, sometimes it results in him running for a decent gain after holding the ball a long time. Both of those are good outcomes from having held the ball "too long". On some occasions he holds the ball "too long", and still ends up throwing it away. In that situation, holding the ball "too long" has no effect. Only infrequently does holding the ball "too long" result in a sack when he could have thrown the ball away. I think those are relatively infrequent and are more than offset by Rodgers not having made a rash decision and thrown an interception.

[bobblehead]

I'm not disagreeing with your conclusion Patler. When you said too much was made of it, I took it as you thought it was overstated, not that it wasn't such a big deal. I, too, can live with it. Every QB has weaknesses (except tom brady, fucker even has great hair and model looks).