I have no experience in coaching or game day strategy--but as an "outside the box" thinker in other aspects of life I want to propose a strategy for the Packers this year. Please feel free to agree, refine, rip it to shreds, call me names - as you see fit:
The Packers should perfect the art of punting the ball out of bounds to eliminate returns.
Argument: Ryan has a hell of a leg, and consistently gets great distance (see CFL stats), but he struggles with hangtime. He outkicks the Packers' coverage team which sets up potentially big returns. Why not cater to his strength (distance) and minimize his weakness (hangtime) by intentionally aiming for the sideline? Poor hangtime is only an issue if there is a return. If the ball is kicked out of bounds then hangtime is a moot point. This strategy would surely sacrifice his Gross Average, but his Net Average would equal his Gross Average if there were no returns. Last year in the NFL the best Gross Average was 45.7 yards, but the best Net Average was only 39.3 yards.
Why couldn't this work?
Has anybody ever tried this?
The Packers should perfect the art of punting the ball out of bounds to eliminate returns.
Argument: Ryan has a hell of a leg, and consistently gets great distance (see CFL stats), but he struggles with hangtime. He outkicks the Packers' coverage team which sets up potentially big returns. Why not cater to his strength (distance) and minimize his weakness (hangtime) by intentionally aiming for the sideline? Poor hangtime is only an issue if there is a return. If the ball is kicked out of bounds then hangtime is a moot point. This strategy would surely sacrifice his Gross Average, but his Net Average would equal his Gross Average if there were no returns. Last year in the NFL the best Gross Average was 45.7 yards, but the best Net Average was only 39.3 yards.
Why couldn't this work?
Has anybody ever tried this?


Comment