Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Punting strategy -- kick out of bounds

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Punting strategy -- kick out of bounds

    I have no experience in coaching or game day strategy--but as an "outside the box" thinker in other aspects of life I want to propose a strategy for the Packers this year. Please feel free to agree, refine, rip it to shreds, call me names - as you see fit:

    The Packers should perfect the art of punting the ball out of bounds to eliminate returns.

    Argument: Ryan has a hell of a leg, and consistently gets great distance (see CFL stats), but he struggles with hangtime. He outkicks the Packers' coverage team which sets up potentially big returns. Why not cater to his strength (distance) and minimize his weakness (hangtime) by intentionally aiming for the sideline? Poor hangtime is only an issue if there is a return. If the ball is kicked out of bounds then hangtime is a moot point. This strategy would surely sacrifice his Gross Average, but his Net Average would equal his Gross Average if there were no returns. Last year in the NFL the best Gross Average was 45.7 yards, but the best Net Average was only 39.3 yards.

    Why couldn't this work?
    Has anybody ever tried this?

  • #2
    I employ this strategy all the time when playing Madden and it seems to work well for the "bend but don't break" D.

    That does not mean that it will work in the Actual NFL but as of right now, I can see no argument against that as a strategy.

    It'll be interesting to see what others have to say.
    "Everyone's born anarchist and atheist until people start lying to them" ~ wise philosopher

    Comment


    • #3
      I think you'd have to be very accurate with kick placement.By mis-judging the angle of the kick, you could easily lose 10-15 yards of field position. Also, this method of punting relies solely on the discretion of the official as to where the ball crossed the imaginary out-of-bounds barrier. And I would like to leave as little as possible to their judgement. We haven't gotten a lot of "home-cookin'" lately.
      "What's one more torpedo in a sinking ship?"
      Lynn Dickey, 1984

      "Never apologize, mister. It's a sign of weakness."
      John Wayne, "She Wore a Yellow Ribbon"

      Comment


      • #4
        I agree with K-Town. It sounds like a good idea but can you imagine what the results would be if he happened to mishit or shank a punt. You'd be looking at a 20-25 yard punt.
        Go PACK

        Comment


        • #5
          A mishit or a shank is always going to result in a bad punt regardless of what the punter was trying to do. So will there be more shanks if he is "aiming" for the sideline rather than down the middle of the field? That is the question. I don't think this works without a lot of practice, but he has 5 weeks to give it the old college try.

          Comment


          • #6
            I think it'd be worth a shot.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Willard
              A mishit or a shank is always going to result in a bad punt regardless of what the punter was trying to do. So will there be more shanks if he is "aiming" for the sideline rather than down the middle of the field? That is the question. I don't think this works without a lot of practice, but he has 5 weeks to give it the old college try.
              Yea, shanks happen no matter what. But if you're aiming right to kick it out of bounds and you shank it right that's certainly gonna go much shorter than a shank that was aimed down the middle of the field.
              Go PACK

              Comment


              • #8
                Anything but BJ.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Bossman641
                  I agree with K-Town. It sounds like a good idea but can you imagine what the results would be if he happened to mishit or shank a punt. You'd be looking at a 20-25 yard punt.
                  So basically a BJ punt
                  Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Willard,

                    Funny thing is I gave this a thought, as well. If he was accurate, then I'd say give it a shot. If he can kick it 60, he should be able to get it up the sideline for a 40 yard average. He would have to be tremendously accurate though, and I'm not sure that he is.
                    "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I never understood why punters stopped going for the coffin corner inside the 20 and instead are looking for the 'football' bounce back in play.
                      Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Good observation on the old "coffin corner" kicks, nobody does that anymore. I think the speed of players today allows them to get under the high punts and down it deep. The coffin corner kicks can be marked anywhere the refs judge it to go out of bounds.

                        Anyhow, we can't punt out of bounds, that would be lame. Play the game, punt it, and go tackle the SOB's

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          The problem with this strategy is the high level of accuracy it requires. He has to kick it consistently about 50 yards in the air to make it worth it (If you do the math-Pythagorus). That would make it around 38-39 yds of field position.
                          If you're kicking straight ahead, you can afford to hit it left or right a few yards. In the sideline strategy that will kill you. A little to one side, and the returner is able to field a shorter punt. A little to the other side, and it becomes a 25 - 30 yard punt.
                          If the punter has a bad shank, it's a lot worse with this strategy.
                          However, I do like the idea of using this when you're trying to pin a team deep. Teams used to do this effectively.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Punting strategy -- kick out of bounds

                            Originally posted by Willard
                            I have no experience in coaching or game day strategy--but as an "outside the box" thinker in other aspects of life I want to propose a strategy for the Packers this year. Please feel free to agree, refine, rip it to shreds, call me names - as you see fit:

                            The Packers should perfect the art of punting the ball out of bounds to eliminate returns.

                            Argument: Ryan has a hell of a leg, and consistently gets great distance (see CFL stats), but he struggles with hangtime. He outkicks the Packers' coverage team which sets up potentially big returns. Why not cater to his strength (distance) and minimize his weakness (hangtime) by intentionally aiming for the sideline? Poor hangtime is only an issue if there is a return. If the ball is kicked out of bounds then hangtime is a moot point. This strategy would surely sacrifice his Gross Average, but his Net Average would equal his Gross Average if there were no returns. Last year in the NFL the best Gross Average was 45.7 yards, but the best Net Average was only 39.3 yards.

                            Why couldn't this work?
                            Has anybody ever tried this?
                            That style of punting is certainly employed in the CFL. The thing is too - the CFL allows one point for a punt that ends up in the end zone and isn't returned into the field beyond the goal line by the player receiving the punt.

                            Read this please:



                            GO PACKERS !
                            ** Since 2006 3 X Pro Pickem' Champion; 4 X Runner-Up and 3 X 3rd place.
                            ** To download Jesus Loves Me ring tones, you'll need a cell phone mame
                            ** If God doesn't fish, play poker or pull for " the Packers ", exactly what does HE do with his buds?
                            ** Rather than love, money or fame - give me TRUTH: Henry D. Thoreau

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I also have wondered why NFL teams went away from directional punting towards the corner like they did years ago. Is it because punters aren't as good as punter years ago?

                              IMO, it's more because Special Teams coaches spend so much more time worrying about get-off times and hang-times nowadays that they forget about the intent of the play and end up ruining half the punters that come up from the college ranks (see BJ Sander). And it's all a waste anyway because 98% of the time opposing teams don't make any real effort at blocking the punt.

                              Ryan averaged about 10-yards better than any punter in the NFL last year. We'll see how much better he does with all the "expert" coaching he gets this year.
                              Click the stop button in IE or hit ESC to stop the moving avatars.- Zool

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X