Tweet
I thought that could have been reviewed and called a tuck.
however, i think that rule is a bunch of shit.
however, i think that rule is a bunch of shit.
-
-
I was wondering about that and was curious: why wasn't that considered part of the tuck rule? Does anyone know? My first guess is that he was trying to run and it wasn't a part of a sack. But I'm really just speculating?Originally posted by Little Whiskey View PostNo longer the member of any fan clubs. I'm tired of jinxing players out of the league and into obscurity. -
His arm wasn't moving forward anymore. He wasn't in the process of tucking the ball when he lost it. He had already brought it back in but still held it loosely away from his body. Being that he had time to tuck it in tight yet failed to do so I agree with the way it was called. That was a clear fumble IMO.Chuck Norris doesn't cut his grass, he just stares at it and dares it to growComment
-
He was still in the process of tucking, just like Cal Johnson was still in the process of going to the ground.Originally posted by Gunakor View Post"Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - WoodbuckComment
Comment