Falcons nickle back is ruled doubtful for Saturdays game. Chris Owens will play in his place. You have to think McCarthy and Rodgers will look to exploit his weakness in coverage.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Brian Willaims Doubtful
Collapse
X
-
The Packers were successful last time going Big 5. I wonder if we might see Big 4 (to exploit the CB situation) plus Starks. Starks' running was the secret weapon last week. At some point, his ability to catch it and run is going to be exploited. Jackson is a good receiver out of the backfield, particularly in the screen game, but I think Starks is better ronning routes and catching it out of the backfield.Last edited by vince; 01-14-2011, 04:21 PM.
Comment
-
What about that power formation with Kuhn, Johnson, and Starks? If you traded some handoffs between Starks and Kuhn, that might be fun. Then throw out of it once in a while."The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."
KYPack
Comment
-
It's one of 2 variations of the Wishbone set.Originally posted by Fritz View PostWhat about that power formation with Kuhn, Johnson, and Starks? If you traded some handoffs between Starks and Kuhn, that might be fun. Then throw out of it once in a while.
I've seen it referred to elsewhere as "Sporting the Bone""Everyone's born anarchist and atheist until people start lying to them" ~ wise philosopher
Comment
-
I'd prefer Jackson simply for the pass blocking. He can read and pick up blitzers extremely well. I haven't seen enough of Starks pass blocking to trust him with ARods future.Originally posted by vince View PostThe Packers were successful last time going Big 5. I wonder if we might see Big 4 (to exploit the CB situation) plus Starks. Starks' running was the secret weapon last week. At some point, his ability to catch it and run is going to be exploited. Jackson is a good receiver out of the backfield, particularly in the screen game, but I think Starks is better ronning routes and catching it out of the backfield.All hail the Ruler of the Meadow!
Comment
-
That was a hell of a formation for us in Philly. Having the double fullbacks split with the running back behind didn't show our hand. We were able to run to either side, because we didn't need to stick a tight end on the line to show a strong and a weak side. I think we'll run a fair amount of this with Driver and Jennings flanked. McCarthy also isn't prone to just sticking fullbacks and running backs in our backfield. We could line up with the power formation, but have Quarless coming out on routes or Starks showed some good hands and fancy footwork out of the backfield last week as well.Originally posted by Fritz View PostWhat about that power formation with Kuhn, Johnson, and Starks? If you traded some handoffs between Starks and Kuhn, that might be fun. Then throw out of it once in a while.
Crowd noise has been mentioned a lot lately, but one thing people tend to forget is crowd noise makes it harder for the home teams defense. If we can create some confusion via motion, or odd formations, we may be able to catch the defense off guard while they're trying to sort it out. I actually like McCarthy as a road coach more than I do at home. He's more aggressive because he trusts Aaron to make the correct calls on the field, which allows him to open up and mess with deafened defenders.
Comment


Comment