Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Injuries in game NFCCC?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Fritz View Post
    I really believe that Rodgers was not the same after he had his bell rung. Even after he scored the TD run he looked pretty shaken up. I think he played the way he did after those incidents in part because he was dazed by those hits.
    You could tell that TD run hurt him because he went with the mini belt celebration instead of going all out. Im not going to bitch too much about the playcall since we scored the TD BUT we should have just like Kuhn take it right up the middle.

    As for the Peppers hit I don't know how he even got up from that. Both QBs took a beating that game.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Brandon494 View Post
      You could tell that TD run hurt him because he went with the mini belt celebration instead of going all out. Im not going to bitch too much about the playcall since we scored the TD BUT we should have just like Kuhn take it right up the middle.

      As for the Peppers hit I don't know how he even got up from that. Both QBs took a beating that game.
      I have bitched about M3 running it but that was before Starks started plowing defenders down. Guess I kinda agree but still liked the TD.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by MadtownPacker View Post
        You bitches are on the money. ARod was not the same after that cheap shot. Which I think was a torpedo mission by peppers. At that point it was the only way they could win the game. Almost worked. Im just glad he has two weeks to get over it but I'm thinking he did get another one. His eyes seemed a little crazy when he did the post game interview on the field. He looked like he did in the ATL game up until the mob hit job.
        He had his hat pulled down pretty low in his locker room interview too.
        When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro ~Hunter S.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Bossman641 View Post
          Wasn't the hit from Peppers at about the midpoint of the 4th quarter. Going by memory but I think that occurred around the 8:00 mark. Then they had the Jennings pass interference on Driver before punting. Raji had the pick 6 next.

          Not saying Rodgers didn't get a concussion, but he was stuggling way before the Peppers' hit.
          Before the Peppers hit, Rodgers was 15/23 had two interceptions and threw one away. Of the other 5 that were incomplete, three came in the Packers second possession of the game. Most of his incompletions were on deep throws. I didn't see him struggle at all.

          After the Peppers hit he was 2/7, missing 3 short throws to Quarless, a short one to Crabtree and a midrange throw to Driver.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Patler View Post
            Before the Peppers hit, Rodgers was 15/23 had two interceptions and threw one away. Of the other 5 that were incomplete, three came in the Packers second possession of the game. Most of his incompletions were on deep throws. I didn't see him struggle at all.

            After the Peppers hit he was 2/7, missing 3 short throws to Quarless, a short one to Crabtree and a midrange throw to Driver.
            Thanks Patler.

            I think my memory is skewed by the 2 drives prior to the Peppers hit. After the Urlacher INT, the Packers had 2 ineffective drives that were more the result of a couple holding penalties and Jackson's -5 yard run where Urlacher had a free run.
            Go PACK

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Patler View Post
              Before the Peppers hit, Rodgers was 15/23 had two interceptions and threw one away. Of the other 5 that were incomplete, three came in the Packers second possession of the game. Most of his incompletions were on deep throws. I didn't see him struggle at all.

              After the Peppers hit he was 2/7, missing 3 short throws to Quarless, a short one to Crabtree and a midrange throw to Driver.
              I was skewed by the poor play before hand too, but from what I remembered he was still throwing pretty much on target until he got nailed by Peppers. After that hit, Rodgers was throwing like, well, Cutler. He got nailed when the bears really ramped up their attack on defense and ended up getting a ton of penalties in a row. I don't know if the hit was an intentional "hit" or if it was just the bears D saying "we have to win this now" and it was just a result of that intensity.
              - Once again, adding absolutely nothing to the conversation.

              Comment


              • #22
                Did anyone else notice how many of Rodgers' "misses" were throws to Quarless? On at least one, Rodgers seemed a bit frustrated with what Quarless had done. Coincidence, or a rookie still learning?

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Patler View Post
                  Did anyone else notice how many of Rodgers' "misses" were throws to Quarless? On at least one, Rodgers seemed a bit frustrated with what Quarless had done. Coincidence, or a rookie still learning?
                  Well, the third down and 4 pass, was a clear drop by Quarless, and two others were partly on him as well. One was that sinker as Rodgers was rolling left. A little low, but catchable. The other I think Quarless cut outside late, but not sure. Of course, Fox had no idea what was going on and had no replays of the route running in the secondary, so who the hell knows other than the coaches?
                  "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Patler View Post
                    Did anyone else notice how many of Rodgers' "misses" were throws to Quarless? On at least one, Rodgers seemed a bit frustrated with what Quarless had done. Coincidence, or a rookie still learning?
                    At least Quarless isn't calling out Rodgers to the media complaining about where the ball is being thrown and being underutilized...
                    No longer the member of any fan clubs. I'm tired of jinxing players out of the league and into obscurity.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Smidgeon View Post
                      At least Quarless isn't calling out Rodgers to the media complaining about where the ball is being thrown and being underutilized...
                      Maybe he should. It seemed to work for TGIFinley.
                      "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        I think it's a rookie thing. Quarless just needs to run those routes live more and have a better feel for where the defense is going to be. He's still thinking too much about hot reads, where the defenders are, etc. IMO.

                        That said, I like Quarless as a good complement to Finley eventually, but he has nowhere near the athletic ability Finley has, even though he's actually a tad faster and has pretty much the same physique. Finley's a freak that catches everything and can't be guarded. Quarless could be good some day.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          In Finleys first year he didn't look all that great either (his hands or routes). I don't mean to defend Quarless, I'm just saying....

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Bub View Post
                            In Finleys first year he didn't look all that great either (his hands or routes). I don't mean to defend Quarless, I'm just saying....
                            Ahmad Carroll ran a 4.29 but had no instincts or ball skills. Sam Shields runs a 4.29 and has good, maybe great, instincts and ball skills. I'm not saying Quarless is Carroll by any stretch, but Finley is an absolute freak of an athlete who needed time to mature and figure stuff out. So has Quarless but I don't see him ever being the game-changer that Finley is when healthy. JMO I've been wrong before and will be again.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Patler View Post
                              Did anyone else notice how many of Rodgers' "misses" were throws to Quarless? On at least one, Rodgers seemed a bit frustrated with what Quarless had done. Coincidence, or a rookie still learning?
                              Rodgers threw one quick slant way too hard. Other than that, Q seemed to be out of position on one and drop another that was a little low. He had a tough day but he's been playing better lately.
                              Last edited by denverYooper; 01-25-2011, 12:07 PM.
                              When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro ~Hunter S.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                First, let me make this clear: In my opinion, Finley is far and away a better player than Quarless ever will be. But this post is more to show that Quarless isn't a slouch either.

                                In Quarless' rookie year (relative to Finley's), he's played in one fewer game and started two more (plus three in the playoffs now). He has 15 more receptions for 164 more yards. They both had the same number of TDs (1), but Quarless fumbled one ball to Finley's none.

                                The real difference (although subtle) is in their averages and longs. Finley averaged a full yard longer on receptions and had a long reception that was 12 yards longer than Quarless'. Which showed that in his six receptions his rookie year that he had the talent to stretch the field.

                                Quarless has had almost four times the receptions Finley did, but hasn't caught a longer ball. I think he'll be the possession TE who can get deep enough, but Finley will be the WR TE who can break a game wide open.
                                No longer the member of any fan clubs. I'm tired of jinxing players out of the league and into obscurity.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X