Yeah, MM thinks he has tunnel vision, but I think he has clouded vision. He's caught up in the moment. If his head were clear he'd know this is a dumb ass, thoughtless move.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Say it ain't so....
Collapse
X
-
I really don't know what to think about this...I do feel kind of bad for the guys who are getting excluded from the picture, I can understand how that makes them feel less part of the team.
But to come out whining like Finley is doing bodes really badly for his maturity, and those were some pretty strong words he and Barnett threw out there. Finley claiming 'disrespect' and 'what have you done for me lately' is not going to sit well at all.--
Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...
Comment
-
I kind of thought of that too. The right thing to do would have been to contact Rob Davis or someone like that and tell him how they felt. Then Davis could have gotten some info collected and went to MM with it. From there, MM could have changed his decision and it would have all been done professionally. To come out on Twitter like this, I think Barnett looks even worse than Finley because he's older. It's a negative check on both of them though. Just a bad way to handle that. Well, there's a good way to kick of the week before the Superbowl. We had to of figured it would have some negativity. Way to go MM, way to keep it on point.Originally posted by Guiness View PostI really don't know what to think about this...I do feel kind of bad for the guys who are getting excluded from the picture, I can understand how that makes them feel less part of the team.
But to come out whining like Finley is doing bodes really badly for his maturity, and those were some pretty strong words he and Barnett threw out there. Finley claiming 'disrespect' and 'what have you done for me lately' is not going to sit well at all.Formerly known as JustinHarrell.
Comment
-
Say 'CHEESE', Finley! And welcome to Cincinnati...if you're not carefulOriginally posted by Guiness View PostI really don't know what to think about this...I do feel kind of bad for the guys who are getting excluded from the picture, I can understand how that makes them feel less part of the team.
But to come out whining like Finley is doing bodes really badly for his maturity, and those were some pretty strong words he and Barnett threw out there. Finley claiming 'disrespect' and 'what have you done for me lately' is not going to sit well at all.
PackerRats Thompson D. Yahoo Fantasy Football Champ 2019,
PackerRats Thompson D. Yahoo Fantasy Football Champ 2018,
PackerRats Pick'Em 2016-17 Champ + Packers year Survival Football Champ 2017,
Rats Yahoo Fantasy Football Champ 2013,
Ratz Survival Football Champ 2012,
PackerRats1 Yahoo Fantasy Football Champ 2006.
Comment
-
It's only a photograph. Do you actually recall any of the other pregame team photos? They are being included in later pregame events and are on the sidelines for the game. I am willing to bet they will be included in everything after the game if the Packers win. They will get their ring and a share of the $. They are worked up about a photo no one will see, or will remember if they do see it.Originally posted by JustinHarrell View PostGood leaders listen. Good leaders admit when they're wrong. McCarthy is approachable. I'll bet you more than one player on the current 53 man roster tells McCarthy it seems rough on their teammates to not have them their for picture. It's bad enough that they were injured on the field fighting for the cause. They deserve this moment too.
Stay focused, fine, I don't give a fuck, but don't leave those guys home. That's just stupid.
Finley hasn't done enough to whine too much. So far, the Packers have gotten less out of him than they have from Jordy Nelson.
Barnett has earned his spot. At least he had the good sense to backtrack a bit from his earlier comments.
The one guy I do feel sorry for, who probably never will have a chance to play in a Super Bowl, is Mark Tauscher. I wonder how concerned he is about not being in the team photo?
Comment
-
I have read many articles in past years about what a logistic nightmare the Super Bowl is. Trying to conduct a weeks worth of practices and game preparations in an unfamiliar facility while sharing it with another team and being swamped by the media and forced into other required events. It's bad enough with the 60 guys on the roster and PS, now you have to work in rehab responsibilties for 16 more players, just because of a photo? If there were just a few, no big deal, but 16? Hell, if the photo is that important, the best answer might be to charter a plane, fly them down for the photo, then right back to GB for a couple days of rehab.Originally posted by JustinHarrell View PostYeah, MM thinks he has tunnel vision, but I think he has clouded vision. He's caught up in the moment. If his head were clear he'd know this is a dumb ass, thoughtless move.
Comment
-
So, if it is tough to get 16 injured players to the game, are you of the opinion then that it will always be unwise for the POTUS to consider attending the Super Bowl for the logistical snarl it would create on an already difficult to plan event?Originally posted by Patler View PostI have read many articles in past years about what a logistic nightmare the Super Bowl is. Trying to conduct a weeks worth of practices and game preparations in an unfamiliar facility while sharing it with another team and being swamped by the media and forced into other required events. It's bad enough with the 60 guys on the roster and PS, now you have to work in rehab responsibilties for 16 more players, just because of a photo? If there were just a few, no big deal, but 16? Hell, if the photo is that important, the best answer might be to charter a plane, fly them down for the photo, then right back to GB for a couple days of rehab.[QUOTE=George Cumby] ...every draft (Ted) would pick a solid, dependable, smart, athletically limited linebacker...the guy who isn't doing drugs, going to strip bars, knocking around his girlfriend or making any plays of game changing significance.
Comment
-
photogate is blowing up...
pft.com
Shanle shares his views on Super Bowl I.R. photo issue
Earlier today, we posted a couple of items regarding the consternation of Packers players on injured reserve who will be omitted from the official team photo.
The Packers responded, explaining that the volume of players on I.R. drove the decision to leave the players in Green Bay until Thursday, two days after the photo is taken.
Tonight, Saints linebacker Scott Shanle chimed in via Twitter. “[W]e had a lot of guys on I.R. too,” Shanle said, referring to the 2009 Saints. “[W]e included everyone because everyone had a part in getting there. [T]he way it should be.”
We agree with Shanle. Though the Packers’ goal is and should be winning the Super Bowl, we don’t see the connection between leaving them behind and bringing the Vince Lombardi Trophy home.
The players on injured reserve landed there through no fault of their own. They’re still part of the team, and they should be included in all of the Super Bowl-related activities.
Comment
-
After the Aaron Rodgers story, I'm not sure PFT has a lot of sway with the Packers. Still, the Packers may reconsider if they feel the issue creates more of a distraction than accomodating the IR players would.I can't run no more
With that lawless crowd
While the killers in high places
Say their prayers out loud
But they've summoned, they've summoned up
A thundercloud
They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen
Comment
-
Well he has his own staff to take care of him.Originally posted by swede View PostSo, if it is tough to get 16 injured players to the game, are you of the opinion then that it will always be unwise for the POTUS to consider attending the Super Bowl for the logistical snarl it would create on an already difficult to plan event?
But the issue isn't getting the IR players there, it's having the training facilities available and staff available to treat them while they are there. Remember, the training room facilities that the Cowboys use alone will be shared by two teams for the week. So the Packers will have limited time to use the facilities for their rostered players, then have to work in 16 more.
Again, all this worry for a photo. The players aren't being left in GB for the whole week. They aren't being excluded from the game. Although some teams in the past have not allowed IR players on the field, the Packers have told their IR players they can be on the field.
Comment
-
Maybe...but by changing their mind now, do they look like they're giving in to whining? I'm inclined to think the MM/TT might get their back up a bit over this.Originally posted by Joemailman View PostAfter the Aaron Rodgers story, I'm not sure PFT has a lot of sway with the Packers. Still, the Packers may reconsider if they feel the issue creates more of a distraction than accomodating the IR players would.--
Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...
Comment

Comment