http://www.jsonline.com/sports/114767889.html
JSO has online poll asking this question.
Without a doubt I believe that trading up for Clay Matthews was his best move. Rodgers fell into our lap, Pickett was simply a typical GM move, and Charles Woodson's first contract was an indication that the Packers--like everyone else in the league--weren't sure that CW was a slam dunk. He was our fallback to that linebacker that no one has heard of since.
But the Matthews deal combined scouting with deal-making with understanding how to get both of the players you wanted instead of just one. To me it was Ted's best single move in an impressive body of work.
Aaron may be the most important player on the team, but picking him was more a matter of luck than a hand well-played.
JSO has online poll asking this question.
Without a doubt I believe that trading up for Clay Matthews was his best move. Rodgers fell into our lap, Pickett was simply a typical GM move, and Charles Woodson's first contract was an indication that the Packers--like everyone else in the league--weren't sure that CW was a slam dunk. He was our fallback to that linebacker that no one has heard of since.
But the Matthews deal combined scouting with deal-making with understanding how to get both of the players you wanted instead of just one. To me it was Ted's best single move in an impressive body of work.
Aaron may be the most important player on the team, but picking him was more a matter of luck than a hand well-played.


Comment