WHAT TO LEARN FROM HOODY TO BEAT PITTSBURG--OUR BLUEPRINT ?

[Bretsky]

Hoody started out the game with the intention to have a somewhat balance attack in beating Pittsburg.

Going into quarter three, the score was still close at 10-3. That is when Hoody put on the full court passing press against the Pittsburg Steelers.

He spread them out often with five receivers
And he shredded them.

Brady methodically led drive after drive by throwing underneath Pittsburgh's two-deep zone defense.
The quick throws confused the Steelers' defense and negated Pittsburgh's oft-successful blitzing schemes.
They often used the pass to set up their running game and finished with a surprising 100 total yards rushing.
Pittsburg had NO sacks.

Brady was 30 of 43 for 350 yards, he had 3 passing TD's, and one rushing TD. They went crazy in the second half with spreading the field and scored 29pts in half two

Is this our blueprint ?

[mmmdk]

Hoody started out the game with the intention to have a somewhat balance attack in beating Pittsburg.

Going into quarter three, the score was still close at 10-3. That is when Hoody put on the full court passing press against the Pittsburg Steelers.

He spread them out often with five receivers
And he shredded them.

Brady methodically led drive after drive by throwing underneath Pittsburgh's two-deep zone defense.
The quick throws confused the Steelers' defense and negated Pittsburgh's oft-successful blitzing schemes.
They often used the pass to set up their running game and finished with a surprising 100 total yards rushing.
Pittsburg had NO sacks.

Brady was 30 of 43 for 350 yards, he had 3 passing TD's, and one rushing TD. They went crazy in the second half with spreading the field and scored 29pts in half two

Is this our blueprint ?

That's the blueprint alright but alas - all went awry with photogate.

[Joemailman]

That's definitely what you want to do. Unlike the Packers, Pittsburgh likes to stay in their base 3-4. They're not quite the same when forced to play a lot of nickel and dime.

[Fritz]

I think of the five wide receiver set as MM's wife, all decked out in a hot little piece of lingerie, beckoning him in, even though the lawn needs to be mowed and the garbage taken out....MM can be lured in by that five receiver set, he starts panting and fantasizing....

[bobblehead]

I think we need to start flynn and play the dink and dunk, unload it quickly game....bench Rodgers should be our blueprint :P

[Tarlam!]

I think of the five wide receiver set as MM's wife, all decked out in a hot little piece of lingerie, beckoning him in, even though the lawn needs to be mowed and the garbage taken out....MM can be lured in by that five receiver set, he starts panting and fantasizing....

You're a sick fuck, but I love that in a poster.

[Patler]

Does Pittsburgh play defense any differently that they did in 2009? Beating Pittsburgh doesn't require MM figuring out how to move the ball on them, MM seems to understand that already, or at least he did a year ago to the tune of 400+ yards and 36 points. The Packers need to figure out how they will stop Pittsburgh from moving the ball, which they couldn't do last year.

[Joemailman]

Does Pittsburgh play defense any differently that they did in 2009? Beating Pittsburgh doesn't require MM figuring out how to move the ball on them, MM seems to understand that already, or at least he did a year ago to the tune of 400+ yards and 36 points. The Packers need to figure out how they will stop Pittsburgh from moving the ball, which they couldn't do last year.

Both teams are better in the secondary than they were a year ago. Steelers have Polamalu back. Packers have replaced Jarrett Bush with Sam Shields and Tramon Williams has elevated his game.

Neither team has quite the weapons they had a year ago on offense. Packers have lost Finley and the Steelers have traded Santonio Holmes.

I'm not sure that what happened last year with have a lot of bearing this year.

[gbgary]

our d is much better this year. i agree with the spread-them-out idea...but do it from the get go. it gets troy p back into coverage and away from the line of scrimage. then the run will work better...just like the bear game.

[Patler]

Both teams are better in the secondary than they were a year ago. Steelers have Polamalu back. Packers have replaced Jarrett Bush with Sam Shields and Tramon Williams has elevated his game.

Neither team has quite the weapons they had a year ago on offense. Packers have lost Finley and the Steelers have traded Santonio Holmes.

I'm not sure that what happened last year with have a lot of bearing this year.

My point was that Pittsburgh's scheme remains the same, and MM understands the scheme well enough that he moved almost effortlessly against it last year. Yes, Polamalu is back and Finley is gone, but the inherent inadequacies of the defense (as with any defense) are still there. I am confident MM will find a way to exploit those. Maybe this will be Quarlless' breakout game!

To win, the improvement has to come on defense, where the Packers were helpless in stopping Pittsburgh. Maybe that improvement will came from a few better players and a few other players playing better, but they have a long way to go on defense. Last year they didn't seem to have a clue how to handle Roethlisberger.

[mraynrand]

I think that's the formula for the offense, with a little more attention to running clock with draws and so forth. Locate Troy P and get favorable matchups on the side where he ain't and the Steeler secondary is in for trouble. But the Packers have to pass protect. The Steeler front might be better - and certainly is more difficult to dissect pre-snap - than Chicago. Jets showed even Brady can be confused. Can the Steelers do the same to Rodgers?

Patler's right about the defense, but the deal was the Steelers lit up Bush like a Christmas tree. They also got some other favorable matchups against fill-in dbs. Even Woodson was getting smoked here and there. They beat the crap outta Roethlisburger, but he kept coming back for more. Steelers have a better run game this year too, I think, but that edge could be gone due to the loss of the center and improved run D from the Pack.

Last year, the Packer D - particularly the secondary - played on it's heels trying to cover up deficiencies - this year they are dictating to opposing offenses. It will be interesting to see which D shows up in the Super Bowl.

[bobblehead]

My point was that Pittsburgh's scheme remains the same, and MM understands the scheme well enough that he moved almost effortlessly against it last year. Yes, Polamalu is back and Finley is gone, but the inherent inadequacies of the defense (as with any defense) are still there. I am confident MM will find a way to exploit those. Maybe this will be Quarlless' breakout game!

To win, the improvement has to come on defense, where the Packers were helpless in stopping Pittsburgh. Maybe that improvement will came from a few better players and a few other players playing better, but they have a long way to go on defense. Last year they didn't seem to have a clue how to handle Roethlisberger.

I would say that them getting back the best safety in the game and us losing a top 2 TE in the game changes things....thats just me.

[mraynrand]

I would say that them getting back the best safety in the game and us losing a top 2 TE in the game changes things....thats just me.

I didn't even know we had Chris Cooley.

[Lurker64]

I would say that them getting back the best safety in the game and us losing a top 2 TE in the game changes things....thats just me.

There's a difference between "understanding conceptually how to attack a defense" and "having the tools to do so." MM demonstrated last year that he understands the former, the question really is does he have to tools to do so.

[Packers4Glory]

their secondary isn't that good and add in the nickle back and its a distinct advantage for GB so long as they control the blitz. I'm sure Pitt is gearing up for just that tho..GB spreading them out. They have 2 weeks to prepare so it might not be so easy.