He's a much better candidate than Sharper IMO... the dude is everything the HOF should be about. Game changing player.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Charles Woodson - HOF?
Collapse
X
-
On and off of the field. The guy's been one hell of a leader these last couple of seasons. I think that went a long way towards the Lombardi this year. His speech after the NFC championship was a classic.Originally posted by mission View PostHe's a much better candidate than Sharper IMO... the dude is everything the HOF should be about. Game changing player.When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro ~Hunter S.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Joemailman View PostThe fact that he's played so well late in his career, and for a high profile team, could give him a shot. That's important because it's easy for people to forget how great he was early in his career before he started to suffer some injuries. By the way, anyone who thinks Woodson plays close to the line of scrimmage because he can't cover anymore should watch a replay of the play on which he got hurt in the Super Bowl. He ran stride for stride with Mike Wallace for a long time.
I think that turf toe was really bothering him early in the year.
Comment
-
-
The voters also look at the complete package of the player and not just on stats. Woodson has been an elite CB when it comes to rush defense. He's physical and doesn't miss a tackle very often. Very good at the blitz. Those are things that the HOF voters love. His versatility. I think the SB win got him as a lock for the Hall.All hail the Ruler of the Meadow!
Comment
-
Thats the way I see it too. He has done too much of everything to not be. He made it to the SB with two team. He is popular with fans and players. He has a great reputation. He has the stats. He was all world in all leagues he has played in.Originally posted by LEWCWA View PostI happen to think when it is all said and done, he will be a shoe in.
If Woodson doesn't get in fuck the Hall of Fame.
Comment
-
Kevin Greene >>>>>>>>>>John the mouth RandleOriginally posted by JustinHarrell View PostI can't believe Kevin Greene is not in. I can't say I have the most vivid memories of when he played, but I do remember he was a terror. His sack numbers are sick. He should be in. If Kevin Greene is not in, Charles Woodson might not be.[QUOTE=George Cumby] ...every draft (Ted) would pick a solid, dependable, smart, athletically limited linebacker...the guy who isn't doing drugs, going to strip bars, knocking around his girlfriend or making any plays of game changing significance.
Comment
-
Then why isn't Leroy Butler in? 5 time All Pro. NFL All-Decade team for the '90s. Great tackler. Fantastic blitzer. First DB ever to have 20 interceptions and 20 sacks. Super Bowl win. Student of the game. NFL/Packer promoter. Fan favorite. Innovator of the Lambeau Leap.Originally posted by Cheesehead Craig View PostThe voters also look at the complete package of the player and not just on stats. Woodson has been an elite CB when it comes to rush defense. He's physical and doesn't miss a tackle very often. Very good at the blitz. Those are things that the HOF voters love. His versatility. I think the SB win got him as a lock for the Hall.
Comment
-
There seems to be a built-in bias against certain positions in the hall. Safeties, Guards, TE's and Kickers have a much harder time getting in, even the great ones, because they are perceived as having a lower skill level than CBs, Tackles and WRs.
Comment

Comment