Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Jones, Jackson Tendered

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Jones, Jackson Tendered

    Earlier this morning, we passed along news that Packers wide receiver James Jones was tendered a one-year contract as a potential restricted free agent, despite a previous report the contrary.


    Brandon Jackson was tendered a contract too
    Posted by Gregg Rosenthal on March 7, 2011, 10:22 AM EST
    Earlier this morning, we passed along news that Packers wide receiver James Jones was tendered a one-year contract as a potential restricted free agent, despite a previous report the contrary.

    A league source informs PFT that Packers running back Brandon Jackson was also given a RFA tag, despite a report to the contrary. (Yes, it was the same report as Jones.) Jackson’s tender was at the third-round level of compensation.

    The tag on Jackson protects the Packers just in case players with four years of experience are not unrestricted free agents after a new CBA is reach. That scenario is viewed as unlikely.

    A return to Green Bay for Jackson would not be a surprise, no matter what his status is. He may have more value to the Packers as a third-down specialist than he has anywhere else.

    TT has all the bases covered.

  • #2
    This makes more sense. I thought it was a big surprise that Jones didn't get tendered.
    "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

    Comment


    • #3
      What was Jones's tender?
      "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

      KYPack

      Comment


      • #4
        As much as I've bad mouthed Jones, I think it would be great if we could keep him another year and he could sort out his drop issues.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Fritz View Post
          What was Jones's tender?
          A chicken. I don't think the Packers disclosed it and Jones didn't say either, per Silverstein.

          Comment


          • #6
            Dammit. Speculation on why no tender for these two was some of our best offseason work. Back to the grindstone Patler!

            And Silverstein should send back last week's paycheck.
            Last edited by pbmax; 03-07-2011, 01:03 PM.
            Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by pbmax View Post
              Dammit. Speculation on why no tender for these two was some of our best offseason work. Back to the grindstone Patler!

              And Silverstein should send back last week's paycheck.
              Ya, the first question I asked in one of the threads was if we KNEW they had not been tendered. The info about Colledge and Crosby came from their agents. I still have seen nothing from the Packers about it. Heck, for all we know Hall and Swain may have been tendered too! Swain should be an exclusive rights free agent, I think. It would be somewhat surprising to me if they hadn't tendered him. Hall has missed a lot of games every year, they might be willing to move on from him, just as with Bigby.

              Hall and Spitz would be good vet-minimum signings to bring to camp.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Patler View Post
                Ya, the first question I asked in one of the threads was if we KNEW they had not been tendered. The info about Colledge and Crosby came from their agents. I still have seen nothing from the Packers about it. Heck, for all we know Hall and Swain may have been tendered too! Swain should be an exclusive rights free agent, I think. It would be somewhat surprising to me if they hadn't tendered him. Hall has missed a lot of games every year, they might be willing to move on from him, just as with Bigby.

                Hall and Spitz would be good vet-minimum signings to bring to camp.
                You did nail it. Silversteing gets Patlerized! lol

                Although, with most of the national media, that's fish in the barrel not just for you, but for most of us. I very, very seldom read anything insightful or informative from them, because we've all been over it here 8 different ways.
                --
                Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by pbmax View Post
                  Dammit. Speculation on why no tender for these two was some of our best offseason work. Back to the grindstone Patler!
                  Damn! I was sure I had it nailed.
                  I can't run no more
                  With that lawless crowd
                  While the killers in high places
                  Say their prayers out loud
                  But they've summoned, they've summoned up
                  A thundercloud
                  They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by pbmax View Post
                    Dammit. Speculation on why no tender for these two was some of our best offseason work. Back to the grindstone Patler!

                    And Silverstein should send back last week's paycheck.
                    Maybe we could shelf this thread for a bit and pretend like we never saw it.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Silverstein did mention in the JSO Blog that his source saw no other Packer tenders on the transaction wire. But he wasn't quite so circumspect last week.
                      Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        glad to hear it!

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          it really doesn't cost that much to tender a guy so it really makes sense that they would lock up those 2 guys and maybe get some draft picks in return if they sign elsewhere. and if they don't, it doesn't cost a lot to keep a couple of decent players around

                          jones has to get his head on straight for next year. he's got a ton of talent, and heart from what i hear, if he could just hold on to the damn ball if could be a real nice weapon

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Veteran players with ability. Jackson is a good change-up. Maybe EB fixes JJ drops.

                            It sure will be tough for new players to make the roster. Amazing TT can keep a talented roster together. Jenkins and Barnett may be the only players of note not returning. Both have already been replaced with solid players.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              If tendering Brandon Jackson means, "Hey bro, here's a Super Bowl T-shirt and a comemmerative poster...Now get the fuck out out of town."...Snake is cool with that shit. That's a tender....right??
                              Last edited by SnakeLH2006; 03-08-2011, 02:58 AM.
                              Snake's Twitter comments would be LEGENDARY.........if I was ugly or gave a shit about Twitter.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X