Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Future of the Packers Defense

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Future of the Packers Defense

    While the Packers officially employed a 3-4, with how often Capers sat in nickel, it seemed to me that it was more of a 2-4.

    So my question is for those prognosticators who know a thing or two about football schemes: was this a one year aberration for the Packers due to personnel, or will it be the Packers' scheme going forward? Will other teams copy?
    No longer the member of any fan clubs. I'm tired of jinxing players out of the league and into obscurity.

  • #2
    Originally posted by Smidgeon View Post
    While the Packers officially employed a 3-4, with how often Capers sat in nickel, it seemed to me that it was more of a 2-4.

    So my question is for those prognosticators who know a thing or two about football schemes: was this a one year aberration for the Packers due to personnel, or will it be the Packers' scheme going forward? Will other teams copy?
    It all depends on personnel. If we have more good DL, we'll play more DL. If we have more good LB's, we'll play more LB's.

    I'm guessing, just the way our roster looks, we'll still see 2-4-5.
    Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

    Comment


    • #3
      Its all about their commitment to stopping the pass. As long as our offense can light it up and other teams feel pressure to pass we will play the best D to stop the pass. That means nickel and a bunch of pass rush.
      The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by bobblehead View Post
        Its all about their commitment to stopping the pass. As long as our offense can light it up and other teams feel pressure to pass we will play the best D to stop the pass. That means nickel and a bunch of pass rush.
        Another good point.

        If we do bring Jenkins back, and Neal really stands out, I think we could see a lot more 3-3-5 nickle. If Neal/Jenkins/Raji is better than Brad Jones or Frank Zombo, then the 2-4-5 goes away. If Jenkins doesn't come back, we stay 2-4-5

        My money is on 2-4-5 next year, but Capers is flexible, if he hsa better personnel for 3-3-5 he'll play it.


        Imagine Jenkins/Neal/Raji lining up with Matthews bouncing from left to right depending on matchup. . . .
        Last edited by RashanGary; 05-31-2011, 05:51 PM.
        Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by JustinHarrell View Post
          Another good point.

          If we do bring Jenkins back, and Neal really stands out, I think we could see a lot more 3-3-5 nickle. If Neal/Jenkins/Raji is better than Brad Jones or Frank Zombo, then the 2-4-5 goes away. If Jenkins doesn't come back, we stay 2-4-5

          My money is on 2-4-5 next year, but Capers is flexible, if he hsa better personnel for 3-3-5 he'll play it.


          Imagine Jenkins/Neal/Raji lining up with Matthews bouncing from left to right depending on matchup. . . .
          We don't need Jenkins back that badly for this to work. Pickett is back, stout and reliable. If Neale is healthy and lives up to expectations, that would do it. Failing that, don't forget about Jolly. I know his status is up in the air, but I don't think there's any valid reason to keep him out of the league for another year. I'm pretty sure there was no valid reason to keep him out last year...
          --
          Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Guiness View Post
            Failing that, don't forget about Jolly. I know his status is up in the air, but I don't think there's any valid reason to keep him out of the league for another year. I'm pretty sure there was no valid reason to keep him out last year...
            Getting the old Johnny Jolly back would be great, if he's still the same guy. I'm filing this in the "don't hold your breath" file though, right next to Justin Harrell. Either one of them would be really nice to see on the field for some DL depth.

            For now, Pickett, Raji, and Neal is a nice 3 man line. Maybe with a small chance of each of Jenkins, Jolly, and Harrell, they can put together a line with some real depth. If we get two of those three "maybes" on the field, that's a great line.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by get louder at lambeau View Post
              Getting the old Johnny Jolly back would be great, if he's still the same guy. I'm filing this in the "don't hold your breath" file though, right next to Justin Harrell. Either one of them would be really nice to see on the field for some DL depth.

              For now, Pickett, Raji, and Neal is a nice 3 man line. Maybe with a small chance of each of Jenkins, Jolly, and Harrell, they can put together a line with some real depth. If we get two of those three "maybes" on the field, that's a great line.
              What about Green. What's his contract situation?
              Originally posted by 3irty1
              This is museum quality stupidity.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Zool View Post
                What about Green. What's his contract situation?
                Forgot about him. Looks like he has one more year, assuming he can keep his weight down.

                The Packers expect DL Howard Green to return next season, softening the blow of Cullen Jenkins' departure via free agency.
                Though he was released for the 12th time during the 2010 season, Green was starting for Green Bay by the playoffs. He's under contract for one more year at $765,000, offering depth up front along with C.J. Wilson and Jarius Wynn. The Packers could also be getting wild cards Justin Harrell and Johnny Jolly back for one more season. Mar 1, 10:55 PM
                Find all the latest Rotoworld fantasy sports news, live coverage, videos, highlights, stats, predictions, and results right here on NBC Sports.

                Comment


                • #9
                  The difference between Jolly and Harrel is that Jolly has shown he can play, and be reliable...obviously something Harrel has not.

                  Greene doesn't fit into the DL style being talked about - strictly a big body for run downs, I think. Not to say he's not an important part of the rotation, a lot was made about our 1000lb, 3 man line during the playoffs.
                  --
                  Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I'll be honest, I like CJ Wilson a lot. He seems like a steal right now, plus he had 10k's in his start yesterday.
                    The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Guiness View Post
                      The difference between Jolly and Harrel is that Jolly has shown he can play, and be reliable...obviously something Harrel has not.

                      Greene doesn't fit into the DL style being talked about - strictly a big body for run downs, I think. Not to say he's not an important part of the rotation, a lot was made about our 1000lb, 3 man line during the playoffs.
                      Harrel has ability but the poor kid can't stay healthy. Jolly can play but the poor fool can't stay out of trouble. This spring will be the last hurrah for Harrel and I'm pulling for him. I doubt Jolly will be reinstated any time soon.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Pugger View Post
                        Harrel has ability but the poor kid can't stay healthy. Jolly can play but the poor fool can't stay out of trouble. This spring will be the last hurrah for Harrel and I'm pulling for him. I doubt Jolly will be reinstated any time soon.
                        Did you see that recent thread here about Jolly? It sure seemed like there was not a very good reason for his suspension even the first time round.


                        btw apologies in advance for some poorly explained math in that thread!
                        --
                        Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          5 defensive backs will be one the field on passing situations. The Packers will usually rush 4 defenders, unless of course it becomes illegal to hit the QB.
                          Last edited by Deputy Nutz; 06-02-2011, 10:32 PM.

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X