Originally posted by SkinBasket
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Green
Collapse
X
-
Six foot is tall for a RB these days, Grant is over 6' 1" and is thought to be big as well. But neither is particularly heavy.Originally posted by Patler View PostWhy is Green often referred to as a big back? I don't think of 6'0", 225 as being a big back. Bigger than some, sure, but there are those that are 15-20 pounds heavier that I think of as big backs. Maybe he tries to run like a big back, but most of the highlight tapes I have seen show him running through big holes untouched. Not much to see in many of those runs except that he had decent speed relative to the guys he was playing against. Not sure how that stacks up against NFL defenses.
Brandon494 suggested that he could be another Najeh Davenport, which might be right. If he is, he will serve a good purpose in a backup, sometime starter roll for a few years. Davenport was a big back at 245-250.Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Comment
-
And Starks is ginormous for a running back. At least in the height department...Originally posted by pbmax View PostSix foot is tall for a RB these days, Grant is over 6' 1" and is thought to be big as well. But neither is particularly heavy.No longer the member of any fan clubs. I'm tired of jinxing players out of the league and into obscurity.
Comment
-
The biggest appeal of Green, for me, is his ability to make people miss without costing too much northboun speed. I don't know how well that will translate to the pro level, but the film of him juking dudes out of their shoes with barely a stutter is what has me excited. You didn't see that from Starks last year, or in his college film. Grant hardly makes people miss, and seldom breaks tackles.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Brandon494 View PostYou say TT has a good eye for talent at the RB position then you use Brandon Jackson as a example.... FAIL. Green might turn out to be a special player but I don't see it. TT has shown a good eye for talent at the WR position and I believe Randall will be the 2nd best WR he has drafted behind only Jenning. I know a lot of you don't follow Kentucky or even watch college football but I'm a football nut and I guarantee this guy will be a player.
What kind of guarantee are you offering?"Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
Comment
-
Congrats on posing like you're banging the mom sister combo. YOu should have those eyebrows waxed though.Originally posted by Brandon494 View PostHad the old one for a while so I figured I'd add some eye candy.... and piss some posters off haha"You're all very smart, and I'm very dumb." - Partial
Comment
-
TT is hardly going to announce that a drafted running back is destined to be a modestly paid, lunch-bucket-toting 3rd down back. All those guys come into the league as college studs, they think they are the second coming of Jim Brown. But I expect TT recognized that both BJ and Green are most likely to be valuable NFL role players. BJ excels as a 3rd down back, we should be satisfied if Green becomes as good.
Comment
-
I think he could be a big upgrade over Jackson... never liked Jackson though, so I'm biased right out of the gate.
Jackson worked his way up to below-average/servicable. As a 3rd down back, he certainly was never a back that had to be accounted for on 3rd down... that should tell you something.
Green is bigger and faster... right there he's an upgrade. If he can stay healthy, and the game isn't too big for him... his ceiling is much higher than Jackson's.wist
Comment
-
Wow, you've really delved deep to figure me out.Originally posted by Brandon494 View PostHahaha where do you see a mom? Also why do you think I'm trying to impress anyone? I just wanted to post a picture with chicks on it but I fucking knew you would be the first one to talk shit about it and that's what's funny! Hahaha 2 easy
Anywho, to your question... Well, the lady on the left and one in the back both look kind of crusty. But I think the one in the back might be a guy or she has some dirt on her chin from... well... I don't want to speculate. So I'm going to say the one on the left is the mom. What do I win?
PS: It's a very nice photo.Last edited by SkinBasket; 07-23-2011, 09:31 AM."You're all very smart, and I'm very dumb." - Partial
Comment


Comment