Originally posted by Patler
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Ahman Green to Retire as a Packer
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Patler View PostNo, its not stupid. It was explained one time that every retired player is listed in the league office with a team affiliation. Lists of players are provided under team designations. As a result, players like to be included with the team they identify most closely with. However, the default is the player is listed under the last team he had a contract with. For Green, that should be the Packers anyway, I think.
If you were Ahman Green, would you want to be listed with the Packers or the Texans?
Which brings up an interesting question relating to a former Packer QB, if he has filed his retirement papers as was claimed. Will he forever be listed with the Vikings in the league offices?Now there you go using his name! Great, now this thread will get banished! I asked the same thing, but at least tried to be coy about it. But you? Nope. You just had to use the "F" word!!!Originally posted by Lurker64 View PostDoes that mean that, in the eyes of the NFL, that Brett Favre is a Viking from now until eternity?
Comment
-
It's doesn't have to be meaningful to you, me or any other fan. It's meaningful to some of the players.Originally posted by sheepshead View PostSoooo Its because of some file in a filing cabinet in New York? I get the gesture but it seems meaningless to me. Another thing for forums to get pissed at players about. Like which hat youll wear in Cooperstown. LOL I have seen people say" He's going in the hall as a Bear or as a Packer. No such thing exists in Canton obviously.
What does what some people think about the HOF have to do with what I wrote, or this thread in general?
Comment
-
I agree with what you are saying, but Green played with us again after he played for the Texans, right? So, this move was unnecessary. Or did he play for somebody after he played for us again? I don't remember him doing so.Originally posted by Patler View PostNo, its not stupid. It was explained one time that every retired player is listed in the league office with a team affiliation. Lists of players are provided under team designations. As a result, players like to be included with the team they identify most closely with. However, the default is the player is listed under the last team he had a contract with. For Green, that should be the Packers anyway, I think.Last edited by HarveyWallbangers; 08-05-2011, 10:55 PM."There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson
Comment
-
He played with that UFL team, maybe that counts in his mind.Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers View PostI agree with what you are saying, but Green played with us again after he played for the Texans, right? So, this move was unnecessary. Or did he play for somebody after he played for us again? I don't remember him doing so.70% of the Earth is covered by water. The rest is covered by Al Harris.
Comment
-
Maybe, but I'm not sure why. The UFL isn't the NFL. I'm sure he'll have other jobs post-NFL. His last NFL contract was with the Packers, right? If he bags groceries at Rainbow for his next job, will he have to sign another contract with the Packers after that's done?Originally posted by 3irty1 View PostHe played with that UFL team, maybe that counts in his mind.
"There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Patler View PostNo, its not stupid. It was explained one time that every retired player is listed in the league office with a team affiliation. Lists of players are provided under team designations. As a result, players like to be included with the team they identify most closely with. However, the default is the player is listed under the last team he had a contract with. For Green, that should be the Packers anyway, I think.Yup, that's what I said already. You don't need to convince me. I doubt the USFL has anything to do with it.Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers View PostI agree with what you are saying, but Green played with us again after he played for the Texans, right? So, this move was unnecessary. Or did he play for somebody after he played for us again? I don't remember him doing so.
Comment
-




Comment