Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ahman Green to Retire as a Packer

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Patler View Post
    No, its not stupid. It was explained one time that every retired player is listed in the league office with a team affiliation. Lists of players are provided under team designations.
    Does that mean that, in the eyes of the NFL, that Brett Favre is a Viking from now until eternity?
    Last edited by Lurker64; 08-05-2011, 07:40 PM.
    </delurk>

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Patler View Post
      No, its not stupid. It was explained one time that every retired player is listed in the league office with a team affiliation. Lists of players are provided under team designations. As a result, players like to be included with the team they identify most closely with. However, the default is the player is listed under the last team he had a contract with. For Green, that should be the Packers anyway, I think.

      If you were Ahman Green, would you want to be listed with the Packers or the Texans?

      Which brings up an interesting question relating to a former Packer QB, if he has filed his retirement papers as was claimed. Will he forever be listed with the Vikings in the league offices?
      Originally posted by Lurker64 View Post
      Does that mean that, in the eyes of the NFL, that Brett Favre is a Viking from now until eternity?
      Now there you go using his name! Great, now this thread will get banished! I asked the same thing, but at least tried to be coy about it. But you? Nope. You just had to use the "F" word!!!

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by sheepshead View Post
        Soooo Its because of some file in a filing cabinet in New York? I get the gesture but it seems meaningless to me. Another thing for forums to get pissed at players about. Like which hat youll wear in Cooperstown. LOL I have seen people say" He's going in the hall as a Bear or as a Packer. No such thing exists in Canton obviously.
        It's doesn't have to be meaningful to you, me or any other fan. It's meaningful to some of the players.
        What does what some people think about the HOF have to do with what I wrote, or this thread in general?

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Patler View Post
          No, its not stupid. It was explained one time that every retired player is listed in the league office with a team affiliation. Lists of players are provided under team designations. As a result, players like to be included with the team they identify most closely with. However, the default is the player is listed under the last team he had a contract with. For Green, that should be the Packers anyway, I think.
          I agree with what you are saying, but Green played with us again after he played for the Texans, right? So, this move was unnecessary. Or did he play for somebody after he played for us again? I don't remember him doing so.
          Last edited by HarveyWallbangers; 08-05-2011, 10:55 PM.
          "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers View Post
            I agree with what you are saying, but Green played with us again after he played for the Texans, right? So, this move was unnecessary. Or did he play for somebody after he played for us again? I don't remember him doing so.
            He played with that UFL team, maybe that counts in his mind.
            70% of the Earth is covered by water. The rest is covered by Al Harris.

            Comment


            • #21
              always loved ahman. Packers HOFer for sure.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by 3irty1 View Post
                He played with that UFL team, maybe that counts in his mind.
                Maybe, but I'm not sure why. The UFL isn't the NFL. I'm sure he'll have other jobs post-NFL. His last NFL contract was with the Packers, right? If he bags groceries at Rainbow for his next job, will he have to sign another contract with the Packers after that's done?
                "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers View Post
                  Why would he need to do that? He came back to the Packers after he was with the Texans, so his last NFL team was the Packers.
                  he wants to retire as a Packer. got to be a Packer to retire as a Packer.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by gbgary View Post
                    he wants to retire as a Packer. got to be a Packer to retire as a Packer.
                    Good point.
                    "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Patler View Post
                      No, its not stupid. It was explained one time that every retired player is listed in the league office with a team affiliation. Lists of players are provided under team designations. As a result, players like to be included with the team they identify most closely with. However, the default is the player is listed under the last team he had a contract with. For Green, that should be the Packers anyway, I think.
                      Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers View Post
                      I agree with what you are saying, but Green played with us again after he played for the Texans, right? So, this move was unnecessary. Or did he play for somebody after he played for us again? I don't remember him doing so.
                      Yup, that's what I said already. You don't need to convince me. I doubt the USFL has anything to do with it.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        This thread is proof that good ideas should never be surrendered to a committee
                        Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Hear, hear! pbmax!
                          Last edited by smuggler; 08-06-2011, 10:12 AM.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            I miss watching Ahman play. He always had the potential to break a game wide open. Always a threat to score from anywhere.
                            No longer the member of any fan clubs. I'm tired of jinxing players out of the league and into obscurity.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by gbgary View Post
                              he wants to retire as a Packer. got to be a Packer to retire as a Packer.
                              this makes way to much sense, you do know this tread could have lasted at least another page without your comment gbgary, your being counter productive to the forum, laughs.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Fritz View Post
                                I think if the Packers are going to do this they ought to make Ahman go through a day of practice in pads, just for old times' sake.
                                Or at least make him pass the conditioning test...

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X