Originally posted by Patler
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Clifton - the NFL's elder statesman LT
Collapse
X
-
Disagree, it was a legal hard nosed aggressive play. The only reason the play was even mentioned on TV and the news after the game was because Clifton was seriously hurt by falling on his hip. Remember, he didnt get a hurt from the hit, he got hurt from the fall. Sapp didnt break his jaw, nose or give him a concussion. He hit him shoulder to shoulder. Those types of plays happen multiple times in every game. We only think it was dirty because it seriously hurt one of our favorite players. Sapp only celebrated because he got an awesome hit on the OT he had been doing battle with all game. I am 100% positive he would not have celebrated the way he did if he knew Clifton was seriously injured.
-
And plenty of guys take shot like that every game...think Hines Ward. The Sapp-Clifton hit was only talked about so much because of the serious injury to Clifton's hip. Sapp didnt do it to intentionally threaten Clifton's career, he did because he was getting his ass wupped by Clifton all game, was frustrated and because he could...Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers View PostPlenty of guys have had the opportunity to make one of those hits, and Sapp was one of the few who actually went over the line and did it--threatening another player's career.
Comment
-
That type of hit carries a high risk of injury. Given that there was no football reason to make the play, what reason was there for the hit? He wasn't doing it to help the play, the only thing that makes sense to me he was that doing it to hurt Clifton. He wasn't thinking of a career threatening injury, but he was certainly trying to cause him pain for no reason related to the sport/play. I would call that a pussy move in any sport.Originally posted by VermontPackFan View PostDisagree, it was a legal hard nosed aggressive play. The only reason the play was even mentioned on TV and the news after the game was because Clifton was seriously hurt by falling on his hip. Remember, he didnt get a hurt from the hit, he got hurt from the fall. Sapp didnt break his jaw, nose or give him a concussion. He hit him shoulder to shoulder. Those types of plays happen multiple times in every game. We only think it was dirty because it seriously hurt one of our favorite players. Sapp only celebrated because he got an awesome hit on the OT he had been doing battle with all game. I am 100% positive he would not have celebrated the way he did if he knew Clifton was seriously injured.
As for you "certainty" that he would not have celebrated, I disagree. He knew Clifton was injured shortly after the play and yet he gave interviews where it was clear that he was still celebrating how great a hit it was. He still gloats about it to this day. He is trash.
Comment
-
+1Originally posted by sharpe1027 View PostThat type of hit carries a high risk of injury. Given that there was no football reason to make the play, what reason was there for the hit? He wasn't doing it to help the play, the only thing that makes sense to me he was that doing it to hurt Clifton. He wasn't thinking of a career threatening injury, but he was certainly trying to cause him pain for no reason related to the sport/play. I would call that a pussy move in any sport.
As for you "certainty" that he would not have celebrated, I disagree. He knew Clifton was injured shortly after the play and yet he gave interviews where it was clear that he was still celebrating how great a hit it was. He still gloats about it to this day. He is trash.
As for the notion he was hurt by the "fall"...? Gimme a break. Sapp separated Clifton's spine from his pelvis and enjoys talking about it yet.
Trash.[QUOTE=George Cumby] ...every draft (Ted) would pick a solid, dependable, smart, athletically limited linebacker...the guy who isn't doing drugs, going to strip bars, knocking around his girlfriend or making any plays of game changing significance.
Comment
-
Have you ever heard the phrase " you have to keep your head on a swivel?" The reason a phrase like that even exists is because players get blindsided every game.Originally posted by sharpe1027 View PostNot when they are jogging no where near the play and with no chance of ever being in the play.
Comment
-
The attitude afterwards was my problem. When you are on the football field you better be looking to hit someone....because I damn sure garauntee someone is looking to hit you. After the game, when you realize you got carried away you should apologize, send flowers and be decent. Warren wasn't. Was the hit dirty? No. Cheap? Yes.Originally posted by Yoop View Post
I agree, Sapp was out to make a name for himself, Clifton had held him in check all day and he had a score to settle, he went head hunting for for Cliffy had a head of steam and blind sided him, really a cheap shot, and his attitude afterward spoke volumes about the charecter of Warren Sapp, the bad part now is he didn't disapear, we now get to listen to the clown at NFL net. the graveyard for wanna b sports announcers.
Pugger, I thought that hit by Martin was less vicious, Charles was on our side
The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi
Comment
-
Bullshit. Sapp was still laughing his ass off on the sideline while Packer medical staff had surrounded Cliffy and Cliffy wasn't moving. Fuck him.Originally posted by VermontPackFan View PostDisagree, it was a legal hard nosed aggressive play. The only reason the play was even mentioned on TV and the news after the game was because Clifton was seriously hurt by falling on his hip. Remember, he didnt get a hurt from the hit, he got hurt from the fall. Sapp didnt break his jaw, nose or give him a concussion. He hit him shoulder to shoulder. Those types of plays happen multiple times in every game. We only think it was dirty because it seriously hurt one of our favorite players. Sapp only celebrated because he got an awesome hit on the OT he had been doing battle with all game. I am 100% positive he would not have celebrated the way he did if he knew Clifton was seriously injured.
Comment
-
You are partially wrong. He was hurt on the hit. Sapp hit him at an angle and twisted cliffys body against the lower body causing the pelvis injury. He launched himself at a player that wasn't looking for contact or to be involved in the play. It was legal. It was cheap. It wasn't dirty, as dirty implies against the rules.Originally posted by VermontPackFan View PostDisagree, it was a legal hard nosed aggressive play. The only reason the play was even mentioned on TV and the news after the game was because Clifton was seriously hurt by falling on his hip. Remember, he didnt get a hurt from the hit, he got hurt from the fall. Sapp didnt break his jaw, nose or give him a concussion. He hit him shoulder to shoulder. Those types of plays happen multiple times in every game. We only think it was dirty because it seriously hurt one of our favorite players. Sapp only celebrated because he got an awesome hit on the OT he had been doing battle with all game. I am 100% positive he would not have celebrated the way he did if he knew Clifton was seriously injured.
You are fully wrong about him celebrating after he knew the extent of the injury. He sat right there on ESPN being a cocksucker AFTER the game when we all knew cliffy was hurt pretty bad. He didn't say sorry. Didn't express concern for the man. He is a cocksucker who made a legal hit that was in fact 100% cheap due to the fact that clifton had no intention of being involved in the play.The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi
Comment
-
Paul Zimmerman didn't think it was just hardnosed football:
While a "legal" hit at the time, it very likely would not be now. From the NFL website:Sapp will be eligible for the Pro Football Hall of Fame in 2012, and there will be some, like Sports Illustrated's Paul Zimmerman, who will likely take into account the hit on Clifton when contemplating Sapp's credentials. As Zimmerman wrote in SI shortly after the play, of which the NFL called legal and never handed out a fine, "Sapp was just getting a free one on a guy who wasn't expecting it. He was crippling the dummy. It was a mean, nasty hit that might have ended a person's career and given him a lifelong souvenir of pain. I always knew Sapp was a phony, but I underestimated his vicious streak."
In many ways, the 2002 on-field collision between Warren Sapp and Clifton was just like a car wreck. Two 300-pound athletes -- one coming full steam with both feet off the ground, the other in a light jog with no idea what was to come -- colliding. And while Sapp came away from the wreckage unscathed, his devastating blindside hit during an interception return -- one that made headlines and eventually led to an NFL rules change -- violently drove Clifton to the turf, where the Packers offensive tackle lay motionless for several minutes in excruciating pain.
...
Three years after the incident, league owners, under the recommendation of the NFL Competition Committee, broadened the interpretation of the unnecessary roughness rule, emphasizing the word "unnecessary" and making illegal similar hits on plays away from the action on the field.
Comment
-
Originally posted by VermontPackFan View PostHis pelvis and his spine were fine, he injured his hip when he fellYup, Bobblehead has it right. It was described once as a wrenching action of the upper body while the lower body stayed still, which tore and strained everything that that connected the pelvis bones together and to his upper body.Originally posted by bobblehead View PostWrong again, it was classified as a pelvic twist.
From an article on the injury:
Fortunately, the injury never involved Clifton's hip joints. The brunt of the damage took place where the two bones of the pelvis join, called the pubic symphysis, a massive ligament that keeps the bones together. Clifton had suffered a three-centimeter tear of the symphysis. From a joint standpoint, nothing had been displaced.
Comment

Comment