Not when the warmth of a dome is involved. AV froze his ass off for years. I can blame him for screwing GB, but not for wanting a heated place to kick.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Moll train?!?
Collapse
X
-
TT doesn't want to shell out money for an offensive guard. He has shown in it in the two years that he has been in Green Bay. You got 5 starting positions on that offensive line, and you can't give all of them 10 million plus in guarantees. It would have been nice to keep Wahle, it would have been nice to sign Hutchinson, but realistically, but realistically, but realistically, wait a minute, why the hell didn't we sign those fellas?Originally posted by BretskyIs it asking too much for us to assume Moll or Spitz are ready as rookies ?Originally posted by HarveyWallbangersThat's what I thought initially, but all of the reports I've read sound like this came about because they want to take a legit look at Moll--not just get him some reps at another position. That tells me they are very concerned with Colledge.Originally posted by MJZiggyI just watched all the interviews from yesterday's practice and EVERYONE said the exact same thing: they're just switching stuff around to see what works best. Don't expect any of it to be permanent.
I'd expect a little shuffling this week and then they'll settle into something depending on what we see when Atlanta comes to town.
I think Colledge will be a good OL eventually. Maybe it was asking too much to assume he was ready to be a starter as a rookie.
Yes
Which is exactly why I'm so perplexed as to TT's lack of interest in quality OL in free agency. And I know there were no great ones besides a couple, but there was plenty of depth with more quality than we went into training camp with.
Comment
-
I would argue that the K situation was unique. There were several OL that could have helped us. Adam V was the cream of the crop and knew it. He also know he had options from Super Bowl contenders and he knew he was going to get his payday where he wanted to play. Vandy was next and one could argue the same for him. Those are elite guys at their postions.Originally posted by PatlerCC claimed today that Green Bay offered more to Vinatieri than Indy did.Originally posted by BretskyThis is pure speculation, but IMO TT makes calls and the GM's often discuss figures with agents.Originally posted by PatlerPerhaps TT was interested, but the players were not interested in coming to GB.
TT was very tight with his change early on and my gut tells me he was not willing to pay for any of the decent ones; money talks. I have a hard time believing we could not have signed a starter if we were offering the best contract. Sometimes it will take that to get a solid player to GB. Reality Bites.
The reality is that money does not always talk, especially with players who have been smart with their money. Some know they are financially secure anyway and really do want a shot with a playoff contender. They will be paid well, regardless.
Most realize that GB is not a contender, and they are not just a player or two away. If they can be close to 8-8 with a young roster, then, maybe, they will again be attractive. For the time being, GB is probably a hard-sell.
But TT could have and should have brought in some OL help, and I'm very confident if they threw the money at a few they could have succeeded.
Heck, look at the diamond those choking Viqueens
brought in.
Now I'm not saying bring Hutch in at that wage, but for God sake Bring Help when help is Desperately Needed.
Or maybe TT just overvalued his ability to pick NFL ready draft picks ?
BTERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER
Comment
-
HERE IS A RADICAL THOUGHT, BUT ONE I HAVE.Originally posted by Deputy NutzTT doesn't want to shell out money for an offensive guard. He has shown in it in the two years that he has been in Green Bay. You got 5 starting positions on that offensive line, and you can't give all of them 10 million plus in guarantees. It would have been nice to keep Wahle, it would have been nice to sign Hutchinson, but realistically, but realistically, but realistically, wait a minute, why the hell didn't we sign those fellas?Originally posted by BretskyIs it asking too much for us to assume Moll or Spitz are ready as rookies ?Originally posted by HarveyWallbangersThat's what I thought initially, but all of the reports I've read sound like this came about because they want to take a legit look at Moll--not just get him some reps at another position. That tells me they are very concerned with Colledge.Originally posted by MJZiggyI just watched all the interviews from yesterday's practice and EVERYONE said the exact same thing: they're just switching stuff around to see what works best. Don't expect any of it to be permanent.
I'd expect a little shuffling this week and then they'll settle into something depending on what we see when Atlanta comes to town.
I think Colledge will be a good OL eventually. Maybe it was asking too much to assume he was ready to be a starter as a rookie.
Yes
Which is exactly why I'm so perplexed as to TT's lack of interest in quality OL in free agency. And I know there were no great ones besides a couple, but there was plenty of depth with more quality than we went into training camp with.
GREEN BAY SHOULD HAVE SIGNED FLANAGAN.
HE WAS SERVICEABLE AS A C OR OG, AND HE WAS A GOOD LEADER AND GOOD PLAYER WHEN HEALTHY.
ALL OF THE POSTS ABOUT HIS DEMISE WERE OVERDONE.
JUST A REMINDER: WE'RE SITTING ON 7MIL NOW WITH SERIOUS WEAKNESSES.TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER
Comment
-
Weren't you a proponent for letting Flanagan go?
Flanny is milktoast. Marco Rivera is just about milktoast in Dallas. He didn't play that well last year--despite the fact he got good pub. Wahle was the damaging one. For what the Packers asked of him, he was a top five OG in the league."There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson
Comment
-
Originally posted by HarveyWallbangersWeren't you a proponent for letting Flanagan go?
Flanny is milktoast. Marco Rivera is just about milktoast in Dallas. He didn't play that well last year--despite the fact he got good pub. Wahle was the damaging one. For what the Packers asked of him, he was a top five OG in the league.
I NEVER BLESSED LETTING FLANY GO; I THINK THE FORUM TALK ABOUT HIM BEING JELLO IS CRAP AND WHEN HEALTHY HE IS STILL ABOVE AVERAGE AT C AND AVERAGE AT OG AND WAY WAY BETTER THAN WHAT WE HAVE AT OG. YES, HE WAS FINE AT GUARD WHEN PLUGGED IN THERE.
I BLESSED LETTING WAHLE (A MISTAKE IN RETROSPECT) AND MARCO GO, ALTHOUGH I DID FIGURE THEY'D KEEP ONE.
BUT IF YA LET THEM GO YOU HAVE TO FIND COMPETENT REPLACEMENTS. TT FAILED US THERE.TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER
Comment
-
CLIFF OUTSMARTED US ALL ON WAHLE.Originally posted by HarveyWallbangersWeren't you a proponent for letting Flanagan go?
Flanny is milktoast. Marco Rivera is just about milktoast in Dallas. He didn't play that well last year--despite the fact he got good pub. Wahle was the damaging one. For what the Packers asked of him, he was a top five OG in the league.
FROM THE GET GO CRISTL SAID YOU DON'T LET A 26YR OLD STAR AT HIS POSITION GO FREELY INTO FA.
HE WAS RIGHT.TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER
Comment
-
Sorry,
Your thread put me in a bad mood..............................cause........... .....
I agreed with the content.TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER
Comment
-
You got me on this one Bretsky, did Flanagan play guard in this century, or back in his real early years?Originally posted by Bretsky
I NEVER BLESSED LETTING FLANY GO; I THINK THE FORUM TALK ABOUT HIM BEING JELLO IS CRAP AND WHEN HEALTHY HE IS STILL ABOVE AVERAGE AT C AND AVERAGE AT OG AND WAY WAY BETTER THAN WHAT WE HAVE AT OG. YES, HE WAS FINE AT GUARD WHEN PLUGGED IN THERE.
Comment
-
Unless I'm losing my mind (certainly a possibility) he filled in at OG in earlier years. He also filled at OT; both injury related.Originally posted by PatlerYou got me on this one Bretsky, did Flanagan play guard in this century, or back in his real early years?Originally posted by Bretsky
I NEVER BLESSED LETTING FLANY GO; I THINK THE FORUM TALK ABOUT HIM BEING JELLO IS CRAP AND WHEN HEALTHY HE IS STILL ABOVE AVERAGE AT C AND AVERAGE AT OG AND WAY WAY BETTER THAN WHAT WE HAVE AT OG. YES, HE WAS FINE AT GUARD WHEN PLUGGED IN THERE.TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER
Comment
-
As TT put it in today's press conference, "back in the days of leather helmets..."Originally posted by PatlerYou got me on this one Bretsky, did Flanagan play guard in this century, or back in his real early years?Originally posted by Bretsky
I NEVER BLESSED LETTING FLANY GO; I THINK THE FORUM TALK ABOUT HIM BEING JELLO IS CRAP AND WHEN HEALTHY HE IS STILL ABOVE AVERAGE AT C AND AVERAGE AT OG AND WAY WAY BETTER THAN WHAT WE HAVE AT OG. YES, HE WAS FINE AT GUARD WHEN PLUGGED IN THERE.
He's really been cuttin' it up in those conferences lately. Anyone who worries about his relationship with the media should really check them out."Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings
Comment
-
I'm not sure I agree with that. For some, yes, but many of these guys are more wealthy than they ever dreamed they would be, and for some another $500,000 or $1,000,000 really doesn't make a difference.Originally posted by HarveyWallbangersPatler,
A large majority of the time... money talks.
Look at Andruzzi last year. Decided that if NE couldn't keep him, the only place he wanted to go was Cleveland. Didn't shop himself at all. Made one visit and signed with Cleveland immediately when the league allowed FA signings to start. Something like literally within hours.
Even Bentley this year didn't make a lot of visits. Openly admitted he wanted to go home to Cleveland after the fact. I know, he got huge money, but I have to wonder if he would have gone there anyway
When the Packers were legitimate contenders, it seemed every year there was an FA or two who signed for a low amount to have a chance at a ring. They don't get that now.
Comment
-
The last I remember of Flanagan playing anywhere but center was when he filled in for Clifton after Clifton was injured. But the Packers even said last year that Flanagan was no longer an option at guard because of his knee problems.Originally posted by BretskyUnless I'm losing my mind (certainly a possibility) he filled in at OG in earlier years. He also filled at OT; both injury related.Originally posted by PatlerYou got me on this one Bretsky, did Flanagan play guard in this century, or back in his real early years?Originally posted by Bretsky
I NEVER BLESSED LETTING FLANY GO; I THINK THE FORUM TALK ABOUT HIM BEING JELLO IS CRAP AND WHEN HEALTHY HE IS STILL ABOVE AVERAGE AT C AND AVERAGE AT OG AND WAY WAY BETTER THAN WHAT WE HAVE AT OG. YES, HE WAS FINE AT GUARD WHEN PLUGGED IN THERE.
Comment



Comment