Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lack of Packers in national news

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Lack of Packers in national news

    We've had other threads about the Packers being under the radar this year, but I thought I'd bring it up again.

    I agree that the rest of the NFL is obviously quite aware of what's going on there. But that's to be expected. For whatever reason, the national media doesn't seem to care about it, and that's a lot less pressure. When NE was doing it, it seemed like there was a microphone in Brady's face asking about it from week 6 on.

    Sportsline has headlines on Hurd, Harrison's suspension, AP, Andre Johnson and McKnight getting healthy, McCoy's concussion, Buress thanking Vick and Billick going to the Dolphins (stupid idea)

    BSPN has Harrison, Hurd, Roethlisburger, AP, McCoy, A. Johnson Ben Watson to IR, some fines (Carter), Newton deserving to go to the Pro Bowl (do they leave off Rodgers, Brees or Eli? oh, right, with the new date, Rodger won't be available!), who is better, Newton or Tebow (oh my) and some Miami players declaring for the draft.

    So, let's look at Pro Football talk. Well, more of the same, plus something about Flacco complaining Tebow gets too much coverage, Dante Hall getting fined (he threw a flag back at an official!), Jax thinking they need to draft another QB cause Gabbert sucks, the Vikings ignoring the DC's play calls...

    Oh, wait a minute!!!!! Finally, mention of the Packers. Apparently, Montana says Rodgers' is playing better than he ever did.

    How the hell is there a team looking at going 14-0 this week-end, and nothing is being written about it? I guess if you're not on a coast, the reporters just really, really don't want to visit you. If it was a coastal team doing this, you'd have paparazzi camping out in the player's parking garage!!!! lol at the idea of paparazzi in Green Bay. Closest thing you've got there is an old lady with cancer, wearing a pink jersey asking Rodgers and Mathews for autographs!
    --
    Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

  • #2
    Originally posted by Guiness View Post
    We've had other threads about the Packers being under the radar this year, but I thought I'd bring it up again.

    I agree that the rest of the NFL is obviously quite aware of what's going on there. But that's to be expected. For whatever reason, the national media doesn't seem to care about it, and that's a lot less pressure. When NE was doing it, it seemed like there was a microphone in Brady's face asking about it from week 6 on.

    Sportsline has headlines on Hurd, Harrison's suspension, AP, Andre Johnson and McKnight getting healthy, McCoy's concussion, Buress thanking Vick and Billick going to the Dolphins (stupid idea)

    BSPN has Harrison, Hurd, Roethlisburger, AP, McCoy, A. Johnson Ben Watson to IR, some fines (Carter), Newton deserving to go to the Pro Bowl (do they leave off Rodgers, Brees or Eli? oh, right, with the new date, Rodger won't be available!), who is better, Newton or Tebow (oh my) and some Miami players declaring for the draft.

    So, let's look at Pro Football talk. Well, more of the same, plus something about Flacco complaining Tebow gets too much coverage, Dante Hall getting fined (he threw a flag back at an official!), Jax thinking they need to draft another QB cause Gabbert sucks, the Vikings ignoring the DC's play calls...

    Oh, wait a minute!!!!! Finally, mention of the Packers. Apparently, Montana says Rodgers' is playing better than he ever did.

    How the hell is there a team looking at going 14-0 this week-end, and nothing is being written about it? I guess if you're not on a coast, the reporters just really, really don't want to visit you. If it was a coastal team doing this, you'd have paparazzi camping out in the player's parking garage!!!! lol at the idea of paparazzi in Green Bay. Closest thing you've got there is an old lady with cancer, wearing a pink jersey asking Rodgers and Mathews for autographs!
    Florio at least talks about Rodgers' year in this piece. It isn't directly related, but it is indirectly.
    No longer the member of any fan clubs. I'm tired of jinxing players out of the league and into obscurity.

    Comment


    • #3
      I hear Mark Sanchez bagged two does within hours of each other.
      "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

      Comment


      • #4
        I think Ted and Mike have that thing humming like a finely tuned machine as you can get in the NFL. Thus, nothing but business during the week. The business of the next opponent. Amazing how a Greg Jennings going down for a few weeks and we get a yawn or maybe some anticipation by some to watch other guys maybe step up. Pretty cool actually when you think about it.
        Lombardi told Starr to "Run it, and let's get the hell out of here!" - 'Ice Bowl' December 31, 1967

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by sheepshead View Post
          I think Ted and Mike have that thing humming like a finely tuned machine as you can get in the NFL. Thus, nothing but business during the week. The business of the next opponent. Amazing how a Greg Jennings going down for a few weeks and we get a yawn or maybe some anticipation by some to watch other guys maybe step up. Pretty cool actually when you think about it.
          You're right, I haven't seen a single article about GJ. Plenty about A. Johnson, of course.

          Don't get me wrong, I'm happy the Pack is being largely ignored. It just baffles me.
          --
          Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

          Comment


          • #6
            ESPN and the NFL seem to have a bit of a grudge against each other. They're forced to work together (sort of.)

            ESPN wins the Monday Night Football bid. The NFL gives them mostly shitty games and then makes sure Sunday night has the premium matchups.

            The NFL starts their own network, really getting their product out there. They'd love to eat their cake and have it too, but ESPN isn't going to be so cooperative. In the NFL's dream world, ESPN would promote the game, helping to grow the fan base. In reality, ESPN could care less about growing the NFL. They cover many sports. Since the NFL has began competing against ESPN, ESPN has pretty much stuck up their middle finger too. People like to hear about Tebow. It does nothing for the overall picture of the NFL, but it helps ESPN.

            Typically, you might find a, "you scratch my back, I'll scratch yours." relationship. With ESPN and the NFL, it seems like the opposite.
            Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by JustinHarrell View Post
              ESPN and the NFL seem to have a bit of a grudge against each other. They're forced to work together (sort of.)

              ESPN wins the Monday Night Football bid. The NFL gives them mostly shitty games and then makes sure Sunday night has the premium matchups.

              The NFL starts their own network, really getting their product out there. They'd love to eat their cake and have it too, but ESPN isn't going to be so cooperative. In the NFL's dream world, ESPN would promote the game, helping to grow the fan base. In reality, ESPN could care less about growing the NFL. They cover many sports. Since the NFL has began competing against ESPN, ESPN has pretty much stuck up their middle finger too. People like to hear about Tebow. It does nothing for the overall picture of the NFL, but it helps ESPN.

              Typically, you might find a, "you scratch my back, I'll scratch yours." relationship. With ESPN and the NFL, it seems like the opposite.
              ESPN also had a decidedly pro-player slant on the news over the summer. Those Monday Night games have been brutal this year. Compared to the NFL Network, ESPN has become almost unwatchable when it comes to NFL coverage.

              Comment


              • #8
                I think the Packers are a little under the radar, but I can't say they completely are. Every time I watch ESPN or the NFL Network, they either have story on the Packers or Tebow. I think both CBS and FOX had pre-game stories on the Packers this week also.
                "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

                Comment


                • #9
                  It's at the point where they can't get away from it. Rachel Nichols will probably be in Green Bay for the next 2 months. I hereby retract my post claiming that ESPN is completely unwatchable.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Let's face it, what is there to cover? Nobody on the team is talking about perfection. The best the media can get anyone to say is, "Sure, we'd like to be a part of something special". Nobody is trying to unload 1 brick of cocaine a week. There is nothing to resemble a Terrell Owens or Chad Ochocinco in the locker room. Packers do not stop on defensless opponents. There are no hold-outs. They aren't owned by a meglomaniac. And trying to get any substantial information out of TT is the painful media equivilant to have root canal surgery.

                    GJ going down? Ha! They have a roster full of pass catches. All they could do is guess on who the next guy up will be. And even with a healthy GJ, that's all they did each week, 'cause unless you county Jordy, Rodgers don't have a favourite target. 19 different TD catchers and counting.

                    Honestly, what can the media actually report?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      i'm glad we're on the back burner. less media pressure etc. tebow, suh, the failed eagles, romo/rob ryan, have distracted the media.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Actually, the Packers are talking about perfection and their desire to chase it. But they are doing it in such an understated way, it doesn't make for headlines. They always leave it up to the coach. Especially when McStubby buries is all under coach speak (which he is close to perfecting) at his twice weekly news conferences. The closest thing has been Rodgers saying he thinks he might know the plan if they clinch HFA.

                        The Packers have been quietly violating most of the taboos of team sports for a while and getting away with it. Its fantastic. Preseason Super Bowl talk last year and this year. The Phototgate blitz duing the first Super Bowl week. Being fitted for rings. Now talk about running the table. Some coaches would have a heart attack, but McCarthy seems non-plussed and has the ability to keep the team focused week to week. Holmgren would have been red faced for a month at this point. So whatever it is he is doing, keep doing it.

                        Its like he is taking lessons from Phil Jackson. He has Zen message control, by having no publicly visible message control.
                        Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I don't remember any interview with any player up until this week where they have given the press anything more than "we're just focused on this week's game. We just want to win this week."

                          I think when they're done with their film study, they all go and get media training.
                          "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Good points. He's been unbelievably good at keeping the team focused on and working toward improving throughout all the success they've had. I know a lot of people think he's changed in order to make the team successful, but I think it's the fact that he's so friggin consistent regardless of the level of success the team has that is part of his secret to keeping the team focused on football rather than how good they are. He's said that he's boring by design and always tries to keep his message on point because he knows the team is listening when he talks to and through the press.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by MJZiggy View Post
                              I don't remember any interview with any player up until this week where they have given the press anything more than "we're just focused on this week's game. We just want to win this week."

                              I think when they're done with their film study, they all go and get media training.
                              Matthews, Rodgers, Woodson and Raji have all said the players want to play for the 16-0. In reality, this won't be a huge deal until they clinch HFA and then a decision has to be made. Then the grilling will get intense because no matter what McCarthy and Thompson do, the press will be after the players asking them if its wise or in line with their preference. And players who are disappointed by the choice will have more motivation to speak.
                              Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X