Studs and Duds - Week 17 New Year's Day!

[Lurker64]

a gunner who can also fill-in at CB is valuable. Perhaps you are right just because there is nothing overly special about Lee, and TT has that wandering-eye of an aging gay man, always looking for younger talent.

Pat Lee is a valuable special teamer... in roles that are not supposed to touch the ball, but it's not really clear how much that's worth to you especially since he's a free agent this year. Man has absolutely no ball skills, so can't really be counted on to play coverage, but the size/speed combo is good so you're happy to have him play gunner/gunner-stuffer. I wouldn't be surprised to see him elsewhere next year.

[Brandon494]

TT should have been fired for that one. i don't care if he did just build a dynasty

I think TT knows what he is doing, Bush had a INT in SB which lead to a TD even though he also gave up a TD. :/

[pbmax]

i'm wondering if giving him a new deal would fix his problem with drops?

he had great hands before this year, maybe he's feeling too much pressure to do too much to get that big payday?

I, for one (Brandon probably makes two, Bretsky three), am hoping that is the case.

[ThunderDan]

I think TT knows what he is doing, Bush had a INT in SB which lead to a TD even though he also gave up a TD. :/

Actually, I am happy with Bush's play this year. He has once again turned into a special teams ace. We know he is what he is in coverage. Not good, hope you don't need him for anything more than a dime back. Good enough to play ST and sniff the field as a dime.

The issue I had was a couple of year's ago he sucked on ST and was his usual on D. He got two false start penalties on the same punt. How do you do that?

[Little Whiskey]

Stud: whoever lined up opposite of Suh. he was an absolute non-factor today.

[Tarlam!]

Stud: whoever lined up opposite of Suh. he was an absolute non-factor today.

Ha! But does the Belt after sacking Flynn, as was pointed out on the lions' thread. Haha.

[MJZiggy]

I, for one (Brandon probably makes two, Bretsky three), am hoping that is the case.

He does seem to be quite demonstrative whether he catches the ball or drops it.

[MJZiggy]

Stud: whoever lined up opposite of Suh. he was an absolute non-factor today.

He had to be a non-factor. He had to play within the rules--no pounding people's heads on the turf.

[Pugger]

I could do without Bush taunting the Lion who just scored a TD on him. What an ass hat.

No shit. Bush is a dope and should only be on the field on ST.

[Pugger]

Tramon - Dud? Calvin roasted him

Calvin roasts most DBs on a regular basis.

[Pugger]

He's classless and clueless and dirty. He did it á la the "Randy Moss Mooning", namely, to incite the crowd. Anytime a Lion made got a play or got a score, the guy tried to incite the crowd. It was part of the game plan. Ugly.

Suh is a real gem. He makes one stinkin' play and "belts"? I hope Flynn belted him back after that TD slant to Finley!

[ThunderDan]

Suh is a real gem. He makes one stinkin' play and "belts"? I hope Flynn belted him back after that TD slant to Finley!

Flynn would have enough class not to "steal" someone else's move!

[Pugger]

i'm wondering if giving him a new deal would fix his problem with drops?

he had great hands before this year, maybe he's feeling too much pressure to do too much to get that big payday?

I think he's been pressing and trying too hard. It was nice to see him catch the ball more than dropping it.

[Pugger]

Stud: whoever lined up opposite of Suh. he was an absolute non-factor today.

Someone on another forum thought it was Sitton...

[Pugger]

Flynn would have enough class not to "steal" someone else's move!

I distinctly remember Flynn doing the belt after a TD in NE last season.