Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Roasted Peprah: NY Daily News

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by George Cumby View Post
    Patler had a comment when Collins was lost that it wasn't trading Collins for Peprah but Collins for Burnett, which I thought was a pretty sound argument at the time.

    But things haven't improved and it's a bit discomfitting. So is it Peprah or is it Burnett? Is there a communication problem back there? Or is it all a function of the lack of pass rush?
    That's assuming Peprah played as well as last year. He hasn't. It's like trading Collins and Peprah playing his best for Burnett and Peprah playing less than his best.
    "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

    Comment


    • #32
      Packers had better hope to God they can pass protect, because they are going to have to outscore the Giants. They will need at least 35, probably 42 to win. I will be surprised if we even see the Giants in third down and more than 3 all day.
      "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

      Comment


      • #33
        I don't understand....we had the better passer rating differential.
        The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by mraynrand View Post
          Packers had better hope to God they can pass protect, because they are going to have to outscore the Giants. They will need at least 35, probably 42 to win. I will be surprised if we even see the Giants in third down and more than 3 all day.
          They had them in 3rd down all day but couldn't stop them when it counted.
          C.H.U.D.

          Comment

          Working...
          X