Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Packers, Wells, LIKELY to PART WAYS

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    When you look at the players whose contracts are up in the next few years, it becomes more understandable as to why TT is not eager to throw 5 - 7 mill a year to Scott Wells.
    "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

    KYPack

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by Fritz View Post
      When you look at the players whose contracts are up in the next few years, it becomes more understandable as to why TT is not eager to throw 5 - 7 mill a year to Scott Wells.
      Starting in 2014 however, TV revenue will go from the current 1.94 billion to 3.1 billion. I'm assuming that will result in a rather substantial increase in the salary cap.
      I can't run no more with that lawless crowd
      While the killers in high places say their prayers out loud
      But they've summoned, they've summoned up a thundercloud
      They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

      Comment


      • #48
        Doesn't it go mostly into the owners' pockets?
        "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

        KYPack

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by Cleft Crusty View Post
          is 74" 6'2"? Clefty always gets confused with inches and feet and how many ounces are in a cup.
          I don't know about ounces and cups, but I have some experience with pints. There are three hundred pints in Scott Wells.

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by hoosier View Post
            I don't know about ounces and cups, but I have some experience with pints. There are three hundred pints in Scott Wells.
            Well isn't he a tall drink of water!

            --
            Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by Fritz View Post
              Doesn't it go mostly into the owners' pockets?
              It's about 58% to the players, to my understanding.

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by Fritz View Post
                Doesn't it go mostly into the owners' pockets?
                Not in Green Bay...

                Comment


                • #53
                  I say draft Peter Konz if he drops to us in the 2nd rd and train him to be the center for the future all I see in him is a upside I mean hes big fast and can pull like a guard he could really help our run game.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by Patler View Post
                    I remember similar complaints when Flanagan was allowed to leave in free agency.
                    Nope I never complained about Flanagan leaving. My point being, we have a crown jewel (Rodgers). So you put the best damn security around that jewel that you can, Wells IS part of that. Makes no sense to give big mouth Finley all that money if the QB can't stay on his feet to get him the ball, which in turn he'll drop anyway.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by Rutnstrut View Post
                      Nope I never complained about Flanagan leaving. My point being, we have a crown jewel (Rodgers). So you put the best damn security around that jewel that you can, Wells IS part of that. Makes no sense to give big mouth Finley all that money if the QB can't stay on his feet to get him the ball, which in turn he'll drop anyway.
                      I didn't mean that you complained, but others did. We had a crown jewel back then, too; and Flanagan was a better player than Wells is, although at the time he left he was a couple years older than Wells is.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by Patler View Post
                        I didn't mean that you complained, but others did. We had a crown jewel back then, too; and Flanagan was a better player than Wells is, although at the time he left he was a couple years older than Wells is.
                        We also had a worse team with a worse cap situation. Also I think wells has been underrated until this year.
                        All tyrannies rule through fraud and force, but once the fraud is exposed they must rely exclusively on force.

                        George Orwell

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          I like Wells, but he was awful at guard. I can't imagine them ever playing him at LT, like Flanagan did.

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by Patler View Post
                            I didn't mean that you complained, but others did. We had a crown jewel back then, too; and Flanagan was a better player than Wells is, although at the time he left he was a couple years older than Wells is.

                            I'd rather have a Lombardi trophy than the Star of Africa.

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Jason Cole says the Packers have spent part of the weekend talking to Well's agent. https://twitter.com/#!/JasonColeYaho...35870513336320

                              But McGinn says they have a long way to go. Bob puts some meat on the bones of his earlier report that Wells wanted big time money. http://www.jsonline.com/sports/packe...140399503.html

                              Bob's article was published last night, so its unclear whether he or Cole have newer information or if any new proposals have changed hands. But McGinn pegs Wells last request at $7.5 mil per year, which would place him 3rd highest among centers. He believes the Packers are offering $4-5 million.
                              Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by pbmax View Post
                                Jason Cole says the Packers have spent part of the weekend talking to Well's agent. https://twitter.com/#!/JasonColeYaho...35870513336320

                                But McGinn says they have a long way to go. Bob puts some meat on the bones of his earlier report that Wells wanted big time money. http://www.jsonline.com/sports/packe...140399503.html

                                Bob's article was published last night, so its unclear whether he or Cole have newer information or if any new proposals have changed hands. But McGinn pegs Wells last request at $7.5 mil per year, which would place him 3rd highest among centers. He believes the Packers are offering $4-5 million.
                                G'bye.
                                [QUOTE=George Cumby] ...every draft (Ted) would pick a solid, dependable, smart, athletically limited linebacker...the guy who isn't doing drugs, going to strip bars, knocking around his girlfriend or making any plays of game changing significance.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X