Originally posted by Scott Campbell
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
One Exec "Packers Have Much Work To Do"
Collapse
X
-
I guarntee they will, only guy I could see leaving is Finley and we would trade him before we let him walk.Originally posted by Zool View PostI don't think anyone is saying Bulaga will break the bank, but there are many players coming up soon for deals. It's not realistic to think that all of them will be retained.
Comment
-
Bulaga also doesn't play LT so you don't have to worry about Joe Thomas money.Originally posted by Brandon494 View PostJust like you guys thought Sitton would make top dollar? Buluga is nice and all but he's no Joe Thomas.
The reality is you have to turnover your roster in the NFL or be left in the dust. Sherman proved that by resigning veterans over and over and restructuring until there was no more room to sign Wahle and Marco. With the salary cap there are only so many superstars your team can afford. If you keep too many you have to have players making close to the league minimum or 5th round rookies to start. In today's NFL you have to decide who you are going to pay the big bucks to and then figure out who to resign early for less money and who you are going to draft to replace the Jenkins and Colledge's of the world.But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.
-Tim Harmston
Comment
-
-
Resigning veterans? More like signing a big FA bust like Joe Johnson. Exactly the Jenkins and Colledges of the world. You let those guys go, you dont let Jennings, Clay, or Raji walk. Jenkins was an older and often injuries player and Colledge was overrated. You can't say that about those guys. Also Raji was a top 10 pick so he's new deal will be simliar to what he has now.Originally posted by ThunderDan View PostBulaga also doesn't play LT so you don't have to worry about Joe Thomas money.
The reality is you have to turnover your roster in the NFL or be left in the dust. Sherman proved that by resigning veterans over and over and restructuring until there was no more room to sign Wahle and Marco. With the salary cap there are only so many superstars your team can afford. If you keep too many you have to have players making close to the league minimum or 5th round rookies to start. In today's NFL you have to decide who you are going to pay the big bucks to and then figure out who to resign early for less money and who you are going to draft to replace the Jenkins and Colledge's of the world.
Comment
-
I'm not really an I told you so kind of guy. I'd rather you be right in this case.Originally posted by Brandon494 View PostYou can bump this thread and give me a "I told ya so".
Or I'd rather this draft yield 5 starters who are equal to or better than the vets coming up for renewal.Originally posted by 3irty1This is museum quality stupidity.
Comment
-
5M sounds about right and by that time Saturday will be off the roster and we'll have someone with a rookie salary starting at center. See how it works now?Originally posted by Scott Campbell View PostThere are 21 NFL tackles that have deals averaging $5M/year or more. So even halfway decent players at that position are tying up a lot of cap space.

Comment
-
Isn't that what I just said that you disagreed with? A veteran leaving and a rookie or first contract guy taking his place. Locking up your superstars. Hmmmm.... maybe you should actually read what people are posting.Originally posted by Brandon494 View Post5M sounds about right and by that time Saturday will be off the roster and we'll have someone with a rookie salary starting at center. See how it works now?
But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.
-Tim Harmston
Comment

Comment