The whole League shebang (that looks terrible in print) right in one spot, National Football Post:
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Official Undrafted Free Agency Thread
Collapse
X
-
Moss is a converted basketball player, he's 6-3, runs a 4.5, has a 41" vert, is a smooth athlete with lateral speed (4.13 shuttle, 6.35 cone), and has (basket)ball skills. He also doesn't have a clue as to how to run a route, but if you wanted to mold a receiver from raw clay, you're not going to do much better with an undrafted guy.Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers View PostAre you saying Moss is the next Bill Schroeder? Tough spot to break into the lineup. Brooks is the one that stands out the most to me.
He has better tools than Gurley, but is comparatively unpolished (and Gurley may be a better special teams player). He's a guy you may not be able to stash on the PS.</delurk>
Comment
-
And don't forget about the 'tool belt'.Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers View PostAre you saying Moss is the next Bill Schroeder? Tough spot to break into the lineup. Brooks is the one that stands out the most to me.
WR is a tough gig for this squad. Jennings and Nelson are obvious locks. Cobb had a good rookie season, and is going nowhere. That means for there to be a spot available, the team has to cut ties with Driver, or decide they want a developmental guy instead of Jones. And for one of these rookies to make it as a developmental guy, they have to beat out Gurley and Smithson.--
Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...
Comment
-
By my count, at least 4 UDFA's spent some time on the active roster last year. Ray Dominguez, Brandon Saine, Vic So'to and J. Lattimore! I wonder how that compares to other teams?Originally posted by Scott Campbell View PostIt's tough to make this team, but the Packers have a reputation as at team where UDFA's have a shot. Somebody always seems to make this team. Last year I think there were 2 that made a loaded roster.--
Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...
Comment
-
There was a report that Richardson was going to move to LB for the Packers, but that seems to have been debunked. His weight is being reported as 216 lbs currently.Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Comment
-
If the Packers were going to role with an LB that slight, we would have given Lattimore snaps in nickel last year.Originally posted by pbmax View PostThere was a report that Richardson was going to move to LB for the Packers, but that seems to have been debunked. His weight is being reported as 216 lbs currently.</delurk>
Comment
-
If this fella is available I'd love to see him at TC. Tauren Poole:Originally posted by Lurker64 View PostI'm going to spend my saturday night obsessively reloading this page: http://www.nepatriotsdraft.com/2012-...ed-free-agents
You are all welcome to join me.
I'd like to see a C (Wedige, Brewster, Anzevino), and an RB (Polk, Carter, Banyard) and maybe some more defensive players (Nzegwu, Fangupo, Burris)
GO TT >>> GO PACKERS !** Since 2006 3 X Pro Pickem' Champion; 4 X Runner-Up and 3 X 3rd place.
** To download Jesus Loves Me ring tones, you'll need a cell phone mame
** If God doesn't fish, play poker or pull for " the Packers ", exactly what does HE do with his buds?
** Rather than love, money or fame - give me TRUTH: Henry D. Thoreau
Comment
-
Smithson? He looked terrible to me last year, and I think he has no shot at making the roster.Originally posted by Guiness View PostAnd don't forget about the 'tool belt'.
WR is a tough gig for this squad. Jennings and Nelson are obvious locks. Cobb had a good rookie season, and is going nowhere. That means for there to be a spot available, the team has to cut ties with Driver, or decide they want a developmental guy instead of Jones. And for one of these rookies to make it as a developmental guy, they have to beat out Gurley and Smithson.
Borel actually showed some potential."There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson
Comment
-
Smithson really has nothing to offer the Packers. He's a guy who, despite below-average athleticism, excelled as a punt/kick returner in college. We've pretty much already concluded that this does not translate to the NFL, and we've already found a punt/kick returner who has above-average athleticism and upside as a returner.Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers View PostSmithson? He looked terrible to me last year, and I think he has no shot at making the roster.
If the Packers had to cut someone in the next five minutes, Smithson is probably the easiest cut.</delurk>
Comment
-
Smithson being added to the practice squad really surprised me last year. Couldn't believe how slow he looked. Maybe he was kept around as a returner in case something happened to Cobb.I can't run no more
With that lawless crowd
While the killers in high places
Say their prayers out loud
But they've summoned, they've summoned up
A thundercloud
They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen
Comment
-
That is my guess. At the very least, Smithson is able to field the ball underhanded (something that some of our return specialist projects in the past have struggled at.) If Cobb were to get hurt, you could promote Smithson and have somebody who is at least able to catch the ball and fall forward for 2 yards without having to risk either having an adventure catching the ball or putting a key player like Tramon back there to field kicks.Originally posted by Joemailman View PostMaybe he was kept around as a returner in case something happened to Cobb.
If there is anybody else on this team who can catch the ball under-handed, does not start for the offense or the defense, and is at least an average NFL athlete for his position, Smithson is the easiest cut on the roster.</delurk>
Comment
-
I didn't know much about Smithson, other than he looked slow. I thought maybe it was just a matter of him catching up with the game? He hung around the PS all year, so I figured he had some promise, but it sounds pretty unanimous that he doesn't!--
Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...
Comment



Comment