Originally posted by Smeefers
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
So What's the Difference? Neal vs Brown Suspensions.
Collapse
X
-
The reporting was very confusing, but I think his "Shock" parole speaks to how seriously authorities took the distribution charges. He wouldn't be out if he was known to be dealing. I would bet the prosecutor added the charge because he could and it was used to gain leverage in plea deals and sentencing.Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
-
Oh, now that you've quoted Sportline, we might as well all throw up our handsOriginally posted by Smeefers View Posthttp://www.cbssports.com/nfl/story/1...distribute/rss
"Jolly was charged with possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute. "
--
Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...
Comment
-
Fine, here are a couple other sites that say there was an intent to distribute added to the charge because of the amount he had:Originally posted by Guiness View PostOh, now that you've quoted Sportline, we might as well all throw up our hands
- Once again, adding absolutely nothing to the conversation.
Comment
-
I am sure the press release stated the street value of the codeine was $2.45 million dollars and that, if convicted, Jolly faced 45 years of jail with no possibility of parole.Originally posted by Smeefers View Posthttp://www.cbssports.com/nfl/story/1...distribute/rss
"Jolly was charged with possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute. "
You can get a grand jury to charge a ham sandwich, that doesn't make it factual. Prosecutors survive because they make it look like they never lose and that they are always targeting the worst criminals in the public's mind. Neither of those conditions is necessarily true.Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Comment
-
C'mon Smeef, the SI link is a photo gallery.Originally posted by Smeefers View PostFine, here are a couple other sites that say there was an intent to distribute added to the charge because of the amount he had:
http://helmet2helmet.net/2011/03/25/...ug-possession/Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Comment
-
This article confirms he was not convicted or sentenced under a charge of distribution. Had such a charge been supported by evidence, he would have been tried on that charge. And he would not be eligible for parole 6 months later.Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Comment
-
Its not serious reporting. And no one is denying he was charged with intent to distribute. What I am saying is that the charge was an inflation of the actual crime.Originally posted by Smeefers View PostRead the quote in the photo gallery.
Paraphrasing a criminal charge is not the same as actually reporting he was a dealer or distributing the drug. If I find a picture that labels Ronald McDonald the Queen of England, does that make it true?Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Comment
-
Thank you. I conceed that he's not a soulless piece of shit drug dealer. He's just a degenerate who threw away millions of dollars for a cheap high.Originally posted by pbmax View Posthttp://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/72...6-years-prison
This article confirms he was not convicted or sentenced under a charge of distribution. Had such a charge been supported by evidence, he would have been tried on that charge. And he would not be eligible for parole 6 months later.- Once again, adding absolutely nothing to the conversation.
Comment
-
I don't know about Queen of England, but I suspect he may be a queen.Originally posted by pbmax View PostIts not serious reporting. And no one is denying he was charged with intent to distribute. What I am saying is that the charge was an inflation of the actual crime.
Paraphrasing a criminal charge is not the same as actually reporting he was a dealer or distributing the drug. If I find a picture that labels Ronald McDonald the Queen of England, does that make it true?"The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."
KYPack
Comment
-
The intent to distribute charge can often be a ploy to get a guy to plea down to possession. At best they could have said that passing the cup around to other guys in the car constitutes distribution. Even a southern all-white jury would have doubts on that one.
He got tossed in jail because he kept ignoring the fact that he was on probation for drinking that stuff, and getting caught drinking it again. It wasn't the severity of the crime, just the repetition of stupidity that forced the hands of the judge.2025 Ratpickers champion.
Comment
-
Great post MS! Exactly how it went down.Originally posted by MadScientist View PostThe intent to distribute charge can often be a ploy to get a guy to plea down to possession. At best they could have said that passing the cup around to other guys in the car constitutes distribution. Even a southern all-white jury would have doubts on that one.
He got tossed in jail because he kept ignoring the fact that he was on probation for drinking that stuff, and getting caught drinking it again. It wasn't the severity of the crime, just the repetition of stupidity that forced the hands of the judge.
I dont think anyone is saying Jolly didnt fuck up. My issue is that punkass goodell and the system are doing everything in their power to make shit difficult for someone who is hurting himself. Nothing new see it all the time. Proof money aint shit.
Comment

Comment