Originally posted by hoosier
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Packers versus Bears Math problem
Collapse
X
-
Its (4/5)^4 or 40.96% chance they win one game of four.
Its not 1- or 100- since there is no replacement here. Its the same odds, same conditions each time. There is no equivalent to taking away a card from the deck.Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Comment
-
Isn't 40.96% the chance that the Packers win all 4? 4/5 for the first, 4/5 for the second, 4/5 for the third, 4/5 for the fourth -> odds that the Packers win all 4 is 4/5*4/5*4/5*4/5...the chance that the Bears win at least one is the inverse of that.Originally posted by pbmax View PostIts (4/5)^4 or 40.96% chance they win one game of four.
Its not 1- or 100- since there is no replacement here. Its the same odds, same conditions each time. There is no equivalent to taking away a card from the deck.
If you were doing a card from the deck it would be 4/5 * 3/4 * 2/3 *1/2, right?
Comment
-
Same odds each time, yes, but you have to look at the problem (what are the odds of Chicago winning at least one) as the reverse probability of GB winning all four. The probabilty of that happening is 80% for the first game, and for the second game it's 80% of the 80% in which they won the first game, and for the third it's 80% of the 64% of the time they won the first two, and so on, which finally makes 40.96%. If that is the probability of GB winning all four, the probabiliy of Chi taking at least one is 100-40.96.
Comment
-
-
Wow, Smuggler. Usually I watch youtube to see 16 year old boys lighting their crotches on fire, or to see slinky women in high heels and short tight dresses.
I'm feeling all edumucated and righteous after watching that youtube video you posted. Thanks!"The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."
KYPack
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fritz View PostWow, Smuggler. Usually I watch youtube to see 16 year old boys lighting their crotches on fire, or to see slinky women in high heels and short tight dresses.
I'm feeling all edumucated and righteous after watching that youtube video you posted. Thanks!sigpic
Comment
-
Oh hell yeah!
But wait...what's the probability that Drew Barrymore will do that with me?
Hmm....P(A) + P(B) = 1. Thus, let's see...plug in .0000413....times that by a negative integer.....subtract from the right side.....mmm.....wait, almost done........then determine the co-efficient of her boobs......hmmmm......let "B" stand for flight times from Detroit to LA......hmmmm......okay......
Aha. The probability is 0%.Last edited by Fritz; 06-21-2012, 01:05 PM."The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."
KYPack
Comment
-
-
You just need to get cast in a leading role with her. How good is your acting?Originally posted by Fritz View PostOh hell yeah!
But wait...what's the probability that Drew Barrymore will do that with me?
Hmm....P(A) + P(B) = 1. Thus, let's see...plug in .0000413....times that by a negative integer.....subtract from the right side.....mmm.....wait, almost done........then determine the co-efficient of her boobs......hmmmm......let "B" stand for flight times from Detroit to LA......hmmmm......okay......
Aha. The probability is 0%.
Comment
-
Fritz could star in Porkies but that's about all!Originally posted by sharpe1027 View PostYou just need to get cast in a leading role with her. How good is your acting?But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.
-Tim Harmston
Comment


Comment