Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

CMIII tweet about Harvin and Forte

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 2
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 template Next
  • #1

    CMIII tweet about Harvin and Forte

    Mathews had a great tweet poking at Harvin and Forte

    Hey @Percy_Harvin, @MattForte22... Got a spare room w/ a bunkbed if interested?? ‪#roomies


    Greg Rosenthal at nfl.com had liked it too

    NFL.com | Official Site of the National Football League
    http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d829feacb/article/clay-matthews-has-solution-for-harvin-forte
    The official source for NFL news, video highlights, fantasy football, game-day coverage, schedules, stats, scores and more.
    --
    Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...
    Tags: None
  • #2
    Trade a third and Jones for Harvin and a second and Starks for Forte
    Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

    Comment

    • #3
      Crap! I just posted this in the Harvin post.
      - Once again, adding absolutely nothing to the conversation.

      Comment

      • #4
        Originally posted by Tony Oday View Post
        Trade a third and Jones for Harvin and a second and Starks for Forte
        Haha. Never happen in the same division. Maybe they could trade them to the Jets, who could then trade them back to us?....

        Comment

        • #5
          Oh lord I was posting it as a joke there is no way I want Migraine or brokedown on the team.
          Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

          Comment

          • #6
            Originally posted by sharpe1027 View Post
            Haha. Never happen in the same division. Maybe they could trade them to the Jets, who could then trade them back to us?....
            Could be Sharpe.

            But don't they have to retire somewhere in the middle to complete the transaction?

            Comment

            • #7
              Originally posted by Tony Oday View Post
              Oh lord I was posting it as a joke there is no way I want Migraine or brokedown on the team.
              Haha. I was kidding. The comment about not trading within the division was just my segway to the joke.

              Comment

              • #8
                Originally posted by KYPack View Post
                Could be Sharpe.

                But don't they have to retire somewhere in the middle to complete the transaction?
                Several times.

                Comment

                • #9
                  Originally posted by sharpe1027 View Post
                  Several times.

                  The ironic thing, Matthews is getting awfully close to a spot in his career where he's damn well earned a new deal.
                  Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    Originally posted by JustinHarrell View Post
                    The ironic thing, Matthews is getting awfully close to a spot in his career where he's damn well earned a new deal.
                    Ya, he's pretty significantly underpaid. The article quoted at saying he's due $800K this year. He's got 2 years left, but I wouldn't be surprised to see the Pack throw a little more money his way before renegotiating. They've done that before.
                    --
                    Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Sounds like CM3 is trying to play GM.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        Originally posted by MadtownPacker View Post
                        Sounds like CM3 is trying to play GM.
                        They should tell him he has to compete for his starting job each year.

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Originally posted by sharpe1027 View Post
                          They should tell him he has to compete for his starting job each year.
                          Lets see if he decides to retire first. Should know by the day TC opens.
                          Originally posted by 3irty1
                          This is museum quality stupidity.

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            I wouldnt want to be the guy competing against him...he might kill someone...CMIII killed a guy!

                            You know it would be HILARIOUS if CMIII got some more cash before the renegotiation and TT said "Yeah we like to take care of our guys and not let them twist in the wind like west of here..."
                            Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Zool View Post
                              Lets see if he decides to retire first. Should know by the day TC opens.
                              Skipping TCs because you are retired. I almost forgot that one.

                              Comment

                              Previous 1 2 template Next
                              Working...
                              X