Rodgers ranked #1 in NFL Network’s Top 100

[Jimx29]

Well, DUH.....

http://blog.packers.com/2012/06/27/rodgers-ranked-1-on-nfl-networks-top-100/

[KYPack]

I know Numby, but I'd rather see him not rated 1.

Bad luck, and all that shit.

[MJZiggy]

Eh. Tom Brady was rated number 1 everywhere for years and he did fine while wearing that stigma...

[Patler]

Eh. Tom Brady was rated number 1 everywhere for years and he did fine while wearing that stigma...

How many Super Bowls has Brady won since being widely recognized as the #1 QB/player? The last was after his fourth season as a starter (2004 season).

How successful was Favre in the playoffs after he was widely considered "the best"?

Starr, on the other hand, was generally always considered "second fiddle" to Unitas until after he won 5 Championships.

We are entering a delicate time in Aaron Rodgers' career. He should be protected from all curses, bad omens, affronts to kharma etc. Packer fans everywhere should vote against Rodgers at every opportunity!

[RashanGary]

Holy Crap!

I'm still stunned at how great AR tuned out.

[Iron Mike]

[Kiwon]

A-Rod's definitely #1. Matthews at #27? I don't know about that ranking.

[Smeefers]

I thought Mathews was ranked a little high at 27, considering he had an off year. I'm not saying he's a poor player, I'm just saying there were several OLB's ahead of him last year. Harrison and Ware just off the top of my head.

[Upnorth]

So in the NFCN Arod, Stafford and Cutler are all upper tier qb's. Add to that Ponder had a 114 passer rating in the red zone and you just gotta ask, has there ever been such a group of top end qb's lumped into one division ever before?
I know this is off topic, but it appears that the NFCN has air superiority to an unheard of degree.

Oh, and I think Arod is ranked to low, hehehe.

[Smidgeon]

I thought Mathews was ranked a little high at 27, considering he had an off year. I'm not saying he's a poor player, I'm just saying there were several OLB's ahead of him last year. Harrison and Ware just off the top of my head.

I don't think he was ranked too high. If anything, I think he was ranked a little low. Even without the sack numbers, he was second (I believe) in the league in QB pressures. That's still quite impressive and doesn't speak to a down year at all.

[Guiness]

So in the NFCN Arod, Stafford and Cutler are all upper tier qb's. Add to that Ponder had a 114 passer rating in the red zone and you just gotta ask, has there ever been such a group of top end qb's lumped into one division ever before?
I know this is off topic, but it appears that the NFCN has air superiority to an unheard of degree.

Oh, and I think Arod is ranked to low, hehehe.

Who was in Chicago when Favre and Culpepper was at the top of his game? I know Detroit had dogshit, Harrington I think. I think Chicago was in the midst of McNown/Miller/Chandler. Miller was not bad for a bit, but I think you're right, the three there now are better than what was in the division then. Although I think Cutler is vastly over-rated, not near as good as Culpepper was for a few years.

[Upnorth]

Who was in Chicago when Favre and Culpepper was at the top of his game? I know Detroit had dogshit, Harrington I think. I think Chicago was in the midst of McNown/Miller/Chandler. Miller was not bad for a bit, but I think you're right, the three there now are better than what was in the division then. Although I think Cutler is vastly over-rated, not near as good as Culpepper was for a few years.

Until last year I though Cutler was overrated, but he really is becoming a decent top 10 qb IMO. As to past NFCN qb's you have the right combination, but I ment all divisions, not just NFCN. Stafford and Cutler are both top ten, Arod is #1 and I think by the end of the year Ponder will be better than Cutler. The NFCN is looking insane.

[Pugger]

Who was in Chicago when Favre and Culpepper was at the top of his game? I know Detroit had dogshit, Harrington I think. I think Chicago was in the midst of McNown/Miller/Chandler. Miller was not bad for a bit, but I think you're right, the three there now are better than what was in the division then. Although I think Cutler is vastly over-rated, not near as good as Culpepper was for a few years.

Who can say. Didn't the bares have a dozen different QBs in the 1990s...?

[Joemailman]

Who was in Chicago when Favre and Culpepper was at the top of his game? I know Detroit had dogshit, Harrington I think. I think Chicago was in the midst of McNown/Miller/Chandler. Miller was not bad for a bit, but I think you're right, the three there now are better than what was in the division then. Although I think Cutler is vastly over-rated, not near as good as Culpepper was for a few years.

From 2000 to 2005, the Bears had the following starting quarterbacks, with number of starts in parentheses:

Cade McNown (17)
Shane Matthews (8)
Jim Miller (15)
Chris Chandler (13)
Henry Burris (1)
Kordell Stewart (7)
Rex Grossman (7)
Chad Hutchinson (5)
Craig Krenzel (5)
Jonathan Quinn (3)
Kyle Orton (15)

[KYPack]

From 2000 to 2005, the Bears had the following starting quarterbacks, with number of starts in parentheses:

Cade McNown (17)
Shane Matthews (8)
Jim Miller (15)
Chris Chandler (13)
Henry Burris (1)
Kordell Stewart (7)
Rex Grossman (7)
Chad Hutchinson (5)
Craig Krenzel (5)
Jonathan Quinn (3)
Kyle Orton (15)

Nice job, Joe.

The Barelys are so pathetic. Wrecks G would have 28 more starts for the Bears. He was his own era, maybe the Grossman Epoch.