TIME TO BE CONCERNED ?

[Bossman641]

Because Jennings waved himself out of the game? Anyone heard that explained yet??

Groin injury - that's all I've heard

[Guiness]

Groin injury - that's all I've heard

That would be bad.

Not as bad as in hockey, but those can really linger and make you really ginger on that first step.

[Brandon494]

Still not concerned, the 49ers are arguably the best team in the NFL right now and as bad as we played it still only a one score game. With that being said something has to change in this defense for us to have any chance of winning a championship this season.

[packers11]

On the last play... If they wanted the 1 on 1 bomb to Jordy. Why wouldn't they just put Finley there. Finley would have caught that ball. He has the best jump ball on the team thats why teams respect him so much inside the redzone when he lines up wide... If he were to get double covered (usually what happens when he lines up wide) then someone would be open in the slot (Jennings, Jordy) ... I'm actually surprised they do not use that game plan more often like they did in 2009 and 2010 with Finley...

[Brandon494]

Sorry but at this point I would trust Jordy over Finley catching the ball.

[MadtownPacker]

Sorry but at this point I would trust Jordy over Finley catching the ball.

Racist.

Fuck, after a long day if hearing shit from 49ers fan I just gotta say the niners are better and that fucking pisses me off.

[RashanGary]

PB,

I listened to Carlos Rogers today on Rome. He said they were showing a lot of cover 2 looks, then dropped the 2nd safety down after the snap, and went man. He said that, with the pressure took AR out of his game.

At the very end of the game, was it mostly man with 2 over? Sure, but when we really lost the game, the early part of it, they were mixing it up on AR by showing zone, but playing man with 1 over.

[Packers4Glory]

Racist.

Fuck, after a long day if hearing shit from 49ers fan I just gotta say the niners are better and that fucking pisses me off.

Well. Hopefully we are better next time when it really counts. Being better week 1 doesn't win super bowls. Lots of time to get it fixed

[pbmax]

PB,

I listened to Carlos Rogers today on Rome. He said they were showing a lot of cover 2 looks, then dropped the 2nd safety down after the snap, and went man. He said that, with the pressure took AR out of his game.

At the very end of the game, was it mostly man with 2 over? Sure, but when we really lost the game, the early part of it, they were mixing it up on AR by showing zone, but playing man with 1 over.

Well that maybe the clue we have been looking for if indeed that was what they were running. Because after the game Rodgers still didn't recognize it if we take him literally.

Could be that he's calling it 2 deep because that's where they start out as a look and he knew the safety was on the move after the snap. At least I hope he knows it after film. But I am damn tired of that kind of look causing confusion. Might have to listen to him on Wilde tomorrow.

[pbmax]

From McGinn in his Rating the Packers:

The 49ers played a lot of Cover-2 Man

I am going to have to order the All-22 package.

[Bossman641]

From McGinn in his Rating the Packers:



I am going to have to order the All-22 package.

Seen a couple quotes from players that the Niners were playing cover 2 and dropping their LB very deep. These are the looks that the offense has to be able to run against.

[rbaloha1]

Seen a couple quotes from players that the Niners were playing cover 2 and dropping their LB very deep. These are the looks that the offense has to be able to run against.

Exactly. Appears MM blames the back more than the o-line for the poor running performance.

[RashanGary]

Well that maybe the clue we have been looking for if indeed that was what they were running. Because after the game Rodgers still didn't recognize it if we take him literally.

Could be that he's calling it 2 deep because that's where they start out as a look and he knew the safety was on the move after the snap. At least I hope he knows it after film. But I am damn tired of that kind of look causing confusion. Might have to listen to him on Wilde tomorrow.

I was confused by that too. AR said that. Then, after the game, I think it was Greg Jennings, maybe it was someone else, but someone on the Packers said they played more man than they expected. I'm all sorts of confused by that.

Who knows when what happened, or what was the surprise, but clearly both happened. I'm pretty sure of that.

[RashanGary]

Oh, PB, here's the Cobb thing

http://www.packers.com/media-center/videos/Cobb-saw-the-field-open-up/15260059-7f9b-4566-8ced-8464ae6c8f41

He says they played a lot of man defense. I have no clue. . . . . I'm sure AR is right and Cobb/Carlos Rogers are right too. I do think Carlos Rogers was on point when he said he thought he caught AR off guard by showing zone, then playing man post snap and sliding the safety down.

[pbmax]

Oh, PB, here's the Cobb thing

http://www.packers.com/media-center/videos/Cobb-saw-the-field-open-up/15260059-7f9b-4566-8ced-8464ae6c8f41

He says they played a lot of man defense. I have no clue. . . . . I'm sure AR is right and Cobb/Carlos Rogers are right too. I do think Carlos Rogers was on point when he said he thought he caught AR off guard by showing zone, then playing man post snap and sliding the safety down.

I think they expected the man coverage unless every report this week was wrong. Rodgers might not have seen or expected 2 deep safeties to be replaced by a single high. But what I want to know is how much of each. Which is why the all22 package is going into the budget.