Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

THE 5 DUDE'S WHO HAVE MADE THE MOST OUT OF TRAINING CAMP ARE ????

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by OS PA View Post
    ....

    McMillan is going to be our nickel and dime safety. I also have a feeling we're going to see a bit of a three safety look with one playing close, one mid, and one deep.

    We could only keep 2 QBs and fill the extra spot on LB, DL, or TE for a special teams body. Am I missing anybody?

    QB - 3 - Rodgers, Harrell, Coleman
    RB - 4 - Starks, Benson, Saine, Green
    FB - 1 - Kuhn
    TE - 3 - Finley, Williams, Crabtree
    OL - 9 - Bulaga, Sitton, Saturday, Lang, Newhouse, EDS, Wells, Sherrod, Taylor
    WR - 5 - Jennings, Nelson, Jones, Cobb, Driver

    DL - 7 - Pickett, Raji, Wilson, Worthy, Muir, Daniels, Hargrove,
    LB - 8 - Matthews, Hawk, Smith, Perry, Walden, Francois, Lattimore, Moses
    CB - 5 - Williams, Bush, Hayward, Shields, House,
    S - 5 - Woodson, Burnett, Jennings, McMillian, Levine
    P - 1 - Masthay
    K - 1 - Crosby
    LS - 1 - Goode
    Originally posted by Patler View Post
    Punter
    No he has it right. McCarthy and the coach and San Diego State are going to bite the bullet and never punt on fourth down this year, just to see if statisticians and game theorists have it right.
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

    Comment


    • #17
      Why the H are we keeping three QBs? AR goes down so does the season so roll with two, try to stash Coleman and if we cant Walmart is full of QBs with a strong arm that are not accurate.
      Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

      Comment


      • #18
        I tihnk Coleman will be PS, that is the part of the reason he has played so little in preseason, it gives the Packers a chance to stash him on PS without other teams looking at him. If AR or GH gets hurt, we IR them and move him up. This also gives MM and crew a year to train him.

        Have the Packers made a call on Quarless yet...did they IR him or PUP. Either way I dont see him back till after week 8.

        I would argue the same for Sherrod, put him on IR(or whatever it is called) for the first 8 weeks of the season.

        The Packers like Ryan Taylor(TE) for his special teams play. I think he makes it at least until Quarless comes back. Then if injuries dont open up a spot a tough call will have tbe made.
        If you don't like me....bite me...
        ....want some, come get some!

        Comment


        • #19
          We're not keeping 3 QB's..Not sure if Starks makes this team..If Benson looks good tonight, I can see going with 3 RB's..
          www.ccso228@twitter.com

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Ballboy View Post
            I tihnk Coleman will be PS, that is the part of the reason he has played so little in preseason, it gives the Packers a chance to stash him on PS without other teams looking at him. If AR or GH gets hurt, we IR them and move him up. This also gives MM and crew a year to train him.

            Have the Packers made a call on Quarless yet...did they IR him or PUP. Either way I dont see him back till after week 8.

            I would argue the same for Sherrod, put him on IR(or whatever it is called) for the first 8 weeks of the season.

            The Packers like Ryan Taylor(TE) for his special teams play. I think he makes it at least until Quarless comes back. Then if injuries dont open up a spot a tough call will have tbe made.
            If they intend on IRing him, my guess is they'll put him on PUP anyway, then re-evaluate at 6 weeks. If the still isn't back (highly unlikely, in my opinion), they'll IR him then with nothing lost.
            No longer the member of any fan clubs. I'm tired of jinxing players out of the league and into obscurity.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by mission View Post
              Boykin is a stud, #3 kind of potential maybe? Borel and Gurley are nice guys who try hard but limited ceilings IMO. Thought Gurley might have it, but he didn't do shit at SC either. Nice body type.

              Merrill I don't even think has a shot at PS. Maybe, but I'd be surprised. His kickoff return lane was like 10 yards wide, I wasn't *that* impressed outside of the blocking.
              Gurley might have saved his job with that great block on ST last week. If he does it again tonight he'll be safe.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Smidgeon View Post
                If they intend on IRing him, my guess is they'll put him on PUP anyway, then re-evaluate at 6 weeks. If the still isn't back (highly unlikely, in my opinion), they'll IR him then with nothing lost.
                I figure they'll do that with him and Sherrod, who I believe still hasn't been on the field.
                --
                Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by imscott72 View Post
                  We're not keeping 3 QB's..Not sure if Starks makes this team..If Benson looks good tonight, I can see going with 3 RB's..
                  They aren't giving up on Starks yet, he has talent and hes extremely cheap. As far as QBs I'd rather go with Coleman as our backup over noodle arm Harrell.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X