Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Trade Jennings?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Originally posted by rbaloha1 View Post
    Exactly my point. No receiver has stepped-up in Jennings absence to say, "I am the man."

    Negotiating fodder for GJ.
    In the one game?

    Comment


    • #77
      Originally posted by mission View Post
      In the one game?

      Right. And Benson sort of did. You can replace a WR with a RB. Offense is offense. Next off season TT could draft a probowl RB and pay him 1.5M per year. The offense might be better off than having Jennings, and save 10M while doing it. That's 10M/year they could use to keep AR, Matthews, Raji and Bulaga in the coming years.
      Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

      Comment


      • #78
        I never thought of Cobb being a #1 receiver he does actually remind me a lot of Steve Smith. Don't know if he will ever be as good but I wouldn't bet against him.

        Comment


        • #79
          Originally posted by JustinHarrell View Post
          Right. And Benson sort of did. You can replace a WR with a RB. Offense is offense. Next off season TT could draft a probowl RB and pay him 1.5M per year. The offense might be better off than having Jennings, and save 10M while doing it. That's 10M/year they could use to keep AR, Matthews, Raji and Bulaga in the coming years.
          Or just cut Hawk or the other aging vets with high salary numbers instead of your #1 receiver whos in his prime.

          Comment


          • #80
            Originally posted by Brandon494 View Post
            Or just cut Hawk or the other aging vets with high salary numbers instead of your #1 receiver whos in his prime.
            Show aging veteran players that would add up to 12M/year that you'd like to cut. We hardly have aging veterans to begin with. After this year, Woodson goes down to 5.5M/year. He's well worth that.

            Oh, and I'm all about cutting Hawk. He would be gone right now if it were up to me. Bishop or no Bishop. We could throw Francois in there.

            Brandon, you have to realize how much money we're going to have to spend in the next couple years. It's going to be at least an additional 30M/year just in AR, Matthews, Raji and Bulaga. It's huge money, cap space we don't have. We have 6M in space right now.

            It's not that simple. There are tough choices when you have too much talent to pay.
            Last edited by RashanGary; 09-18-2012, 09:39 PM.
            Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

            Comment


            • #81
              If Woodson goes down to 5.5 then that saves us 6M, Saturday making 4M , Hawk making 6.5, Driver 2.5M, Pickett making 5.7M, James Jones 3.1 and who knows if we will resign Finley who is making 6M. Of those guys I listed who would you rather keep over Jennings? Keep him mind hes already making 7.5M a season but if Jennings will only settle for top WR money then I guess he will be gone because some team like the Redskins will pay him.

              Comment


              • #82
                Originally posted by Brandon494 View Post
                If Woodson goes down to 5.5 then that saves us 6M, Saturday making 4M , Hawk making 6.5, Driver 2.5M, Pickett making 5.7M, James Jones 3.1 and who knows if we will resign Finley who is making 6M. Of those guys I listed who would you rather keep over Jennings? Keep him mind hes already making 7.5M a season but if Jennings will only settle for top WR money then I guess he will be gone because some team like the Redskins will pay him.
                I have a feeling a lot of the players you just listed will be gone shortly. Get rid of all of those guys and add jennings to the list, and you have about 35M. That's about what it's going to take to keep our stars around.
                Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

                Comment

                Working...
                X