Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Over 5400 "likes" already in just over an hour

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Over 5400 "likes" already in just over an hour

    The Bottom Line:
    Formally Numb, same person, same views of M3

  • #2
    My favorite comment on that site about the replacement refs:

    "Send 'em back to footlocker."

    I kinda feel for the refs on the field, but what the hell is going on with whoever is in the booth? Are they scabs too? Getting the call wrong after video review is inexcusable.
    "My problems with him are his vision and tendency to dance instead of pounding a hole." - Harvey Wallbangers

    Comment


    • #3
      +1 for whomever started the page
      "Everyone's born anarchist and atheist until people start lying to them" ~ wise philosopher

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by superfan View Post
        My favorite comment on that site about the replacement refs:

        "Send 'em back to footlocker."

        I kinda feel for the refs on the field, but what the hell is going on with whoever is in the booth? Are they scabs too? Getting the call wrong after video review is inexcusable.
        Initial report in Game Day thread was that on a reception call, they cannot reverse WHO was ruled to have caught it. They can rule on whether it was a clean catch (not hit the ground, controlled ball through going to the ground) but not reverse the credit of the catch.

        Not sure if that's for all catches or just for scoring play.
        Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

        Comment


        • #5
          the refs never got together to confer and decide what the call was. 2 different calls and they go to replay to review what? he assumed TD?

          Comment

          Working...
          X