Originally posted by Cheesehead Craig
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The NFl Responds
Collapse
X
-
Exactly and little by little the NFL is treating the fans like we are their bitches that happily bow and give our money.Originally posted by ThunderDan View PostIn a sense they already do that with the ESPN and NFL Network games.
I was mad when they put games on ESPN. I was furious when they put games on a newly created NFL Network to make network providers purchase their product.
Comment
-
That's been going on for a long timeOriginally posted by MadtownPacker View PostExactly and little by little the NFL is treating the fans like we are their bitches that happily bow and give our money."Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
Comment
-
Yes and we are the fucking enablers but in the last few years it has gotten crazy with ESPN MNF and these fucked up Thursday NFL Network games.Originally posted by mraynrand View PostThat's been going on for a long time
We all just need to watch the games on some streaming site try to fuck over the NFL without kicking our addiction.
Comment
-
This is what I do. Fuck cable. Fuck Dish. Fuck Direct TV. Fuck the NFL. Fuck em all and their billions.Originally posted by MadtownPacker View PostYes and we are the fucking enablers but in the last few years it has gotten crazy with ESPN MNF and these fucked up Thursday NFL Network games.
We all just need to watch the games on some streaming site try to fuck over the NFL without kicking our addiction.
Comment
-
Sad but true statement.Originally posted by MadtownPacker View PostExactly and little by little the NFL is treating the fans like we are their bitches that happily bow and give our money.But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.
-Tim Harmston
Comment
-
Goodell speaks....
http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcnorth/pos...auty-of-sports
During a conference call to discuss the league's labor agreement with its regular officials, Goodell offered measured sympathy for the mistakes that contributed to the Packers' defeat. He classified them in the broader sense of the league's history of officiating blunders -- although he offered no caveat that Monday night's officials were far less qualified than those who contributed to previous mistakes -- and suggested that subsequent outrage over the ending represented "the beauty of sports and the beauty of officiating."Thursday, Goodell said he hadn't viewed the play with the league's officiating department because he has been in negotiations all week. He said "I'll stand by" the league's statement.
Standing by a decision not to address a primary question isn't good enough for the commissioner of the NFL. Fortunately, he was asked a follow-up: How could you look at that play and not see it as an interception? Goodell's answer is one that might satisfy a board room but certainly won't resonate well in the locker room or a sports bar.
"You obviously have a very strong view about what you think the call was," he told the reporter. "… That's the beauty of sports and the beauty of officiating. There are controversial calls and people see them differently. I understand that. That's the beauty of sports."
It's only beautiful, I suppose, if you're not the Packers. Asked directly about the impact the play could have on the Packers' playoff hopes, Goodell said: "I understand the frustration."Go PACK
Comment


Comment