Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ouch!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Rastak
    Originally posted by packrulz
    My glass always starts out full, then it's half empty, then it's empty and I have to get another one. The schedule is easier this year, especially in the first half, so if they get off to a good start I think they'll win a least 8 games. It's funny, the Vikings got rid of Culpecker, Moss, most of their RB's, & lost Koren Robinson, yet the writers think they'll be pretty good.

    They should have a solid O-line and D-line which goes a long way toward winning games. Also, Moss and Culpepper were good but flawed players. Moss plays when he feels like it...the melt down on Monday night sure looked familiar. Culpepper was very inconsistent. What running backs did they lose? Bennett? Nice guy, very limited runnign back. Moe Williams? 100 years old. They aquired a guy who played very well last year in Chester Taylor and they still have their young backs in Moore and Fason. Not wure where you are coming from on that comment....anyway, enjoy the game tonight.


    edit: Koren Robinson loss does stink a lot on kick returns.
    Ras, how's Faison looking this year? He got a chance to start? I think the guy holds some promise if he gets some PT.

    Comment


    • #17
      Rastak, I do not like the purple monochrome pants. Are those supposed to be little white horns instead of stripes on the side??

      But then again, that doesn't have much to do with anything, huh?

      Comment


      • #18
        As long as they kick everyone else's asses in the north, i'll be content, and i don't see any reason why they can't win all of them

        fvck Cristl......he only writes shit like that to get a rise out of the fanbase. Me thinks he's logged in here right now reading this thread/forum........*nodsnods*
        The Bottom Line:
        Formally Numb, same person, same views of M3

        Comment

        Working...
        X